• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Hopkins now a HUGE favourite to win the show
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
Rufus Knights
28-01-2015
Katie now a big 6/4 favourite to win the show. She's even as low as 5/4 with some bookmakers. Her nearest rival is Cheggers on 5/1. This is by far the biggest gap we've seen between the top two favs since the show began.

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/big-br...brother/winner

Hopkins - 6/4
Cheggers - 5/1
Nadia - 11/2
Perez - 7/1
Katie P - 8/1
reader123
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Rufus Knights:
“Katie now a big 6/4 favourite to win the show. She's even as low as 5/4 with some bookmakers. Her nearest rival is Cheggers on 5/1. This is by far the biggest gap we've seen between the top two favs since the show began.

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/big-br...brother/winner

Hopkins - 6/4
Cheggers - 5/1
Nadia - 11/2
Perez - 7/1
Katie P - 8/1”

It is Perez I am shocked at, did not expect him to be that high.
missfrizzy
28-01-2015
I think I would rather anyone in there win before Hopkins. Even Cami li or Kavana, and that's saying something.
bbfivenever
28-01-2015
As long as betting is a factor in BB or CBB there will never be a real winner decided by the viewing public.


Katie Hopkins (Like Helen Wood before her) were massive outsiders to win, and the money flew on them at high odds, then to make their bets winners they can phone a huge amount of times.

There's too much money on Hopkins now for her not to win.
Sharona68
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by reader123:
“It is Perez I am shocked at, did not expect him to be that high.”

Really? Yet you're not surprised at Katie Hopkins being favourite??
Luner13
28-01-2015
She won't win.

She'll no doubt make the final but she will never ever win.
Rufus Knights
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by bbfivenever:
“As long as betting is a factor in BB or CBB there will never be a real winner decided by the viewing public.


Katie Hopkins (Like Helen Wood before her) were massive outsiders to win, and the money flew on them at high odds, then to make their bets winners they can phone a huge amount of times.

There's too much money on Hopkins now for her not to win.”

You are being naive if you think it's that easy to make money!

If it really was that easy we would all lump on Kav at 100/1 and then start voting for him. Helen won because at the final stage of voting she was the most popular housemate. Popularity can change throughout the process.

Katie was an outsider before she entered the house but her odds were slashed pretty much after night one as she impressed the public.
DiamondDoll
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by bbfivenever:
“As long as betting is a factor in BB or CBB there will never be a real winner decided by the viewing public.


Katie Hopkins (Like Helen Wood before her) were massive outsiders to win, and the money flew on them at high odds, then to make their bets winners they can phone a huge amount of times.

There's too much money on Hopkins now for her not to win.”

At 50p a go, I doubt that very much.
bbfivenever
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Rufus Knights:
“You are being naive if you think it's that easy to make money!

If it really was that easy we would all lump on Kav at 100/1 and then start voting for him.”

It is very easy especially with the exchanges also on it.

I could have been paid out thousands already on Hopkins if i'd backed her from the start at the bookies and then laid her at Betfair at just over 2.0
Rufus Knights
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by reader123:
“It is Perez I am shocked at, did not expect him to be that high.”

I am not surprised one bit. Regardless of what you think of Perez you cannot deny he's been a big character in the house. I'm not surprised he has more support than the likes of Kav, Cami, Michelle and Calum.
Matt_Maher
28-01-2015
I thought there was an earthquake here then, but I think I can feel the shaking rage of some people at the thought of Katie H winning!
Cranberryapple
28-01-2015
Cheggars is worth a little bet. I''m liking his odds at the moment. Maybe a 20£ flutter methinks

Still got 10 days to go, but I think he's 'sealed' his pretty nice, genuine guy deal with the Public

I just can't see Katie H winning.

Too much has gone before her.

Only my opinion, of course.
mmpfb
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Cranberryapple:
“Cheggars is worth a little bet. I''m liking his odds at the moment. Maybe a 20£ flutter methinks

Still got 10 days to go, but I think he's 'sealed' his pretty nice, genuine guy deal with the Public

I just can't see Katie H winning.

Too much has gone before her.

Only my opinion, of course.”

Several ex-wives, for a start.
this_THAT
28-01-2015
really don't know whey they vote for her? because they don't like perez? only reason i can come up with, she hasn't really done much else.
Cranberryapple
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Rufus Knights:
“You are being naive if you think it's that easy to make money!

If it really was that easy we would all lump on Kav at 100/1 and then start voting for him. Helen won because at the final stage of voting she was the most popular housemate. Popularity can change throughout the process.

Katie was an outsider before she entered the house but her odds were slashed pretty much after night one as she impressed the public.”

It was the Anti Ashleigh vote at that stage.

Forums were awash with it. Even on here there were numerous posters saying that's exactly what they were doing.

Nadia / Perez / Keith could well get the Anti Katie vote too
paralax
28-01-2015
Well she doesn't have much competition does she, Perez and his sidekick Nadia have no hope, Cheggers, Pricey, Kav bring very little, Callum and Cami are ok, but not hugely popular which really leaves Katie and Michelle, and Michelle seems to be dropping down the pecking order.

Katie love her or hate her has certainly put herself in the centre of things and not played it safe, I think it would have been the Perez show totally had she not been there.
Matt_Maher
28-01-2015
I bet the death threats are being typed already in case she wins.
Rufus Knights
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Cranberryapple:
“It was the Anti Ashleigh vote at that stage.

Forums were awash with it. Even on here there were numerous posters saying that's exactly what they were doing.

Nadia / Perez / Keith could well get the Anti Katie vote too”

Yes, and i'm quite sure some people voted for Ashleigh purely because they didn't like Helen. It works both ways!

We don't have the option of asking every single voter why they voted for someone so the only statistic that truly matters is -- who receives the most votes.
vald
28-01-2015
Katie could well win. It all depends if the fans of others, particularly Perez and Nadia, decide to join together for an 'anybody but Katie' vote.

Personally I don't care. None of them enthuse me enough to spend money on them, and they'll all be forgotten about in a couple of weeks.
mitacond
28-01-2015
Well that is interesting OP I however am not keen that Katie H should win but then who am I?
wotnot
28-01-2015
I don't really mind if Hopkins wins, the show was ruined for me by putting her in the house in the first place because she quite frankly doesn't deserve a public platform of any form.
DiamondDoll
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by vald:
“Katie could well win. It all depends if the fans of others, particularly Perez and Nadia, decide to join together for an 'anybody but Katie' vote.

Personally I don't care. None of them enthuse me enough to spend money on them, and they'll all be forgotten about in a couple of weeks.”

I can hardly remember Ken and Chloe plus the American guy whose name I can't even remember.
ruffle
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by missfrizzy:
“I think I would rather anyone in there win before Hopkins. Even Cami li or Kavana, and that's saying something.”

I felt that way about both gary and Helen last year it did not change anything thy both took the crown sad really this year for me is anyone but parez
Pro_Sniper
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by bbfivenever:
“As long as betting is a factor in BB or CBB there will never be a real winner decided by the viewing public.


Katie Hopkins (Like Helen Wood before her) were massive outsiders to win, and the money flew on them at high odds, then to make their bets winners they can phone a huge amount of times.

There's too much money on Hopkins now for her not to win.”

The amount these so-called "betting coup groups" could get on(at worthwhile odds) to the amount they'd have spend in order to all but guarantee their selection wins..means it's of no great appeal. The bookies are too tight to take any serious money on such an exploitable, mickey mouse market. And the exchanges don't offer the proper liquidity.

The bottom line is this: if you believe Hopkins is nailed on for the win then the "odds-against" still on offer represent incredible value. You can more than double your money on an outcome that is a mere formality! On betfair there's currently over 1k around the even money mark waiting to be matched for Hopkins winning. Even though I despise the woman, I'd shovel everything I had on her winning If I was absolutely certain it was fixed, or that she had enough moronic support behind her to get enough votes to win. But since I'm not, I was happy enough to lay off all the bets I made at the beginning so that I break even regardless of who is called the winner. I've learned my lesson on betting on these joke reality shows and will refrain from doing so ever again.
juliadesigns
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by vald:
“Katie could well win. It all depends if the fans of others, particularly Perez and Nadia, decide to join together for an 'anybody but Katie' vote.

Personally I don't care. None of them enthuse me enough to spend money on them, and they'll all be forgotten about in a couple of weeks.”

My sentiments exactly
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map