The secret to Katie Hopkins success is that she mops up a lot of people in her vaguely anti-P.C agenda. She picks up:
People who hate political correctness.
People who believe that benefits claimants are undeserved.
People who yearn for the old days when life was simpler.
People who are full of hate and want to hurt others.
People who are annoyed they can't tell racist jokes anymore.
People who are right wing and believe that there is a liberal media conspiracy.
People who equate being horrible with being 'real' or 'honest'.
This adds up to a sizeable group of people. They believe Katie's victory would be 'one in the eye' for political correctness and would annoy the 'liberal elite'.
Jim Davidson won partly on an anti-PC ticket. The difference I believe, is that Jim was genuinely charismatic and amusing.
Helen Wood won on a 'be horrible and intimidating' ticket. Somehow that meant to many that she was more down to earth and honest than others.
Personally, I don't like Katie. Not so much because of her opinions, more because she's not half as clever as she thinks she is and not at all funny. She has made me cringe with her silly made-up persona and sigh at her lame attempts to be controversial.
However, by hitching herself to this UKIP-style, anti-PC, good old days, anti-liberal, pull-your-socks-up, bandwagon she has found a great way to win not only column inches and TV appearances, but also reality TV votes.
People who hate political correctness.
People who believe that benefits claimants are undeserved.
People who yearn for the old days when life was simpler.
People who are full of hate and want to hurt others.
People who are annoyed they can't tell racist jokes anymore.
People who are right wing and believe that there is a liberal media conspiracy.
People who equate being horrible with being 'real' or 'honest'.
This adds up to a sizeable group of people. They believe Katie's victory would be 'one in the eye' for political correctness and would annoy the 'liberal elite'.
Jim Davidson won partly on an anti-PC ticket. The difference I believe, is that Jim was genuinely charismatic and amusing.
Helen Wood won on a 'be horrible and intimidating' ticket. Somehow that meant to many that she was more down to earth and honest than others.
Personally, I don't like Katie. Not so much because of her opinions, more because she's not half as clever as she thinks she is and not at all funny. She has made me cringe with her silly made-up persona and sigh at her lame attempts to be controversial.
However, by hitching herself to this UKIP-style, anti-PC, good old days, anti-liberal, pull-your-socks-up, bandwagon she has found a great way to win not only column inches and TV appearances, but also reality TV votes.


What do you think she would feel looking at your twitter account....that we can all acess on DS