• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Which kind of assault would be considered more serious?
Dr Z
28-01-2015
Moving a womans bathrobe to expose her breast, or kissing/ licking someone who has made it clear they do not want you to?

Just wondered.
VinoCollapso
28-01-2015
Well, Katie was all up in his grille and junk, she put her face right next to him and was goading him. They're both as bad as each other.
peterstone
28-01-2015
She enjoyed that. She was laughing
yogacats
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Dr Z:
“Moving a womans bathrobe to expose her breast, or kissing/ licking someone who has made it clear they do not want you to?

Just wondered.”

Or going that close up into someone's face??? She was the aggressive one!
Hazellou
28-01-2015
Oh c'mon, scraping the barrel a bit there aren't you?
Dr Z
28-01-2015
That's no defence whatsoever! You wouldn't suggest that the other incident was chloe's fault for being within 'grabbing' distance.
bananaman_007
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by VinoCollapso:
“Well, Katie was all up in his grille and junk, she put her face right next to him and was goading him. They're both as bad as each other.”

Think you will find he was in her face. Katie was trying to avoid him and told him several times to get away.

It does not excuse being licked what is he a dog? Katie could have had him chucked out for that
fisch
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Dr Z:
“That's no defence whatsoever! You wouldn't suggest that the other incident was chloe's fault for being within 'grabbing' distance.”

Well its obvious Saint Perez can do no wrong That was disgusting IMO If he didnt want her that close just say go away not lick her
John_Daryl
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by bananaman_007:
“Think you will find he was in her face. Katie was trying to avoid him and told him several times to get away.

It does not excuse being licked what is he a dog? Katie could have had him chucked out for that”

The tedious Sawalha would have called the Police!!
paralax
28-01-2015
Suppose Ken had done that, he would have been booted out. If she had done that to him, he would have been straight into the diary room.
VinoCollapso
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by bananaman_007:
“Think you will find he was in her face. Katie was trying to avoid him and told him several times to get away.

It does not excuse being licked what is he a dog? Katie could have had him chucked out for that”

Nope, she stayed there ranting at him in his face and he licked her face. She carried on ranting in his face and he kept on kicking. Both of them are morons.
VinoCollapso
28-01-2015
Licking! Not kicking! That's tomorrow night's show...
revolver44
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Hazellou:
“Oh c'mon, scraping the barrel a bit there aren't you?”

This thread is so unbelievable it should be sponsored by Disney, tbh
Miss Con Strue
28-01-2015
I wouldn't want to be licked by Perez, so I wouldn't shove my face into his, virtually inviting him to do so. She so wanted him to do it, so she could complain to BB.
Jimmy Connors
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Miss Con Strue:
“I wouldn't want to be licked by Perez, so I wouldn't shove my face into his, virtually inviting him to do so. She so wanted him to do it, so she could complain to BB.”

Yet when they (BB) asked her she said she had no problems at all with Perez.
Mrs Teapot
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by VinoCollapso:
“Nope, she stayed there ranting at him in his face and he licked her face. She carried on ranting in his face and he kept on kicking. Both of them are morons.”

Indeed, I don't believe in invading people's personal space especially if unwanted so I apply that to both of them!
Norn2
28-01-2015
that's a silly thing to say, because hopkins did not object to it in a serious manner. and it clearly looked like she was enjoying it.
John_Daryl
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Miss Con Strue:
“I wouldn't want to be licked by Perez, so I wouldn't shove my face into his, virtually inviting him to do so. She so wanted him to do it, so she could complain to BB.”

Oh, PerLEASE!!!....he DID do it and did she complain to BB?!!.....Now just re-read what you put and see if you still think its makes sense!!!!!
shazzersere
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by bananaman_007:
“Think you will find he was in her face. Katie was trying to avoid him and told him several times to get away.

It does not excuse being licked what is he a dog? Katie could have had him chucked out for that”

Totally agree he should have had a warning
all_night
28-01-2015
Good on Katie for not milking that situation, which is exactly what Perez would have done if she'd have licked him.

Big Brother alluded to it when asking Katie, and as she said he is no problem.
Matt_Maher
28-01-2015
Either way it shows the laughable hypocrisy of some people on here.
Happy to let something so disgusting go simply because it happened to someone they don't like.
John_Daryl
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Matt_Maher:
“Either way it shows the laughable hypocrisy of some people on here.
Happy to let something so disgusting go simply because it happened to someone they don't like.”

Hear hear
ucra girl
28-01-2015
Originally Posted by Matt_Maher:
“Either way it shows the laughable hypocrisy of some people on here.
Happy to let something so disgusting go simply because it happened to someone they don't like.”

That is DS sadly
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map