Did they ask him the same question when she flatly refused to leave him alone and followed him everywhere he went hurling vile abuse at him?

If so, why didn't we see it? And if not, why not? You don't suppose they are engineering it so the Hopkins creature wins?

Staggering hypocrisy from BB they may as well have just put in big letters across the screen WE HAVE AN AGENDA!

Don't forget The bite on ken

Perez was touching her, she was just using words and arguing which is normal for the show but he was grabbing her and licking her face so it could have been something that she found inappropriate.

Yeah, I imagine they just wanted to check as he was physical with her (even though it was playful, I imagine they don't want to leave any margin for error these days!).

I'm a bit lost with a couple of the replies here. I don't see how playful banter (even physical) is in any way on the same level as constant, relentless disgusting verbal abuse.

This.

He should have got a warning.

The abuse from him to her or from her to him?

I guess you sometimes have to allow adults to shout it out, do we really want them stopping all interaction and talking about the weather?

good point (as he does have his legal team on standby) but to be honest I think they both had a fun moment there for a change and reminded me of the old days of bb when housemates had fun in the house without an agenda

i dont care about perez to be honest hes vile and i wont forget what he done to ken and oh yea i cant forget who he is i will never like him.

Of course not but BB went completely in the opposite direction. They have lost control of the show in fact they have been spectacularly woeful from day one.

They saw what was happening in a multitude of situations and just rolled with it every single time till they got past the point of no return.

If BB reffed a football match between two teams who hate each other they would have let them do their own thing till finally everyone was sent off by half time.