Whose husband did Katie H screw in the garden?

3 of 3

diesels hummin

29-01-2015

Originally Posted by Melax:
“The man was never someone's property so therefore could never be "stolen". against his will. Tiny fact I know, but nonetheless true.

Which part of "she ended up marrying him" wasn't understood?

"She ended up marrying him" suggests to me that the stolen man was somewhat unhappy with his previous owner.

Is stealing a human male against his will any worse than embarking on an affair with an East Enders co-star while your husband is in the midst of a depression and who then eventually commits suicide and mentions your affair with East enders co-star in the actual suicide note?

Maybe I should ask Nadia that one.”

They have both got a lot to answer for.

Jennyuk

29-01-2015

Originally Posted by hisdogspot:
“'She ended up' marrying two of them, didn't she ? ... two of the married men she was carrying on with, that is

Two kids by the first married man she 'ended up' with ... and then another one with the other married man she 'ended up' with

oh, and in between there was another married man who she didn't 'end up' with, but whose family was broken nevertheless

Why is this behaviour being defended ? ”

BIB I'm not defending her action's, but what i am defending is these men knew they had wive's and children, so they should have respected that they had a choice to say no, she shouldnt get all the blame. Plus one poster even called her a prostitue because of her job.

hisdogspot

29-01-2015

Originally Posted by Jennyuk:
“BIB I'm not defending her action's

.”

Well that's good Jenny

I give Hopkins stick on this forum but I've said time and again that she should be in the final .... she deserves to be there, along with Perez, because they are the two who have brought most ( and given most ) to the show

But that doesn't mean she should be defended at every turn

This sh*te she pulled in her private life ... causing immeasurable pain and destruction to the innocent lives she had no thought for is, quite simply, indefensible

Think she's been a great housemate, sure ... even I think she's been a great housemate ... but let the idea that her affairs with married men were 'OK' go

They weren't ... they really weren't

Jennyuk

29-01-2015

Originally Posted by hisdogspot:
“Well that's good Jenny

I give Hopkins stick on this forum but I've said time and again that she should be in the final .... she deserves to be there, along with Perez, because they are the two who have brought most ( and given most ) to the show

But that doesn't mean she should be defended at every turn

This sh*te she pulled in her private life ... causing immeasurable pain and destruction to the innocent lives she had no thought for is, quite simply, indefensible

Think she's been a great housemate, sure ... even I think she's been a great housemate ... but let the idea that her affairs with married men were 'OK' go

They weren't ... they really weren't”

I wish you had quoted my full post but never mind, in all honesty i despise her and Perez, but i find it silly that the woman always get's the blame for affair's when the man is no better, and should be held responsable for his behaviour.

hisdogspot

29-01-2015

Originally Posted by Jennyuk:
“I wish you had quoted my full post but never mind, in all honesty i despise her and Perez, but i find it silly that the woman always get's the blame for affair's when the man is no better, and should be held responsable for his behaviour.”

I'd agree with you normally, I really would

But when it's three affairs ... three families broken ... and one woman is the common denominator ?

Well, you have to have a re-think

* edited to add* I apologise for snipping your post ... I didn't mean to imply that what you had to say didn't interest me, I just wanted to address that particular point

3 of 3