|
||||||||
I complained to Ofcom tonight for the first time |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,239
|
I complained to Ofcom tonight for the first time
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,503
|
Ugh, here we go again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Guarding Anne-the Klepto-666
Posts: 57,165
|
And when BB asked Hopkins if she was bothered, guess what?
She said NO. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,805
|
Call the Police
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: south wales
Posts: 3,403
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Smiley Ho ☺♪♫
Posts: 9,693
|
Quote:
Ugh, here we go again...
Where do you buy the TVs that don't have an off switch? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 994
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Budapest
Posts: 2,710
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,845
|
For goodness sake, switch off and don't ruin the show.
Have you not wondered by OFCOM has only ever got involved in one incident... the race row. Since then, OFCOM has received complaints in over 200 different occasions, and the reason why they haven't done anything is because the programme has NOT broken the regulations. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 19,616
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. I agree, it was totally unacceptable - and he should get a warning for that . Jeremy was kicked out , and this is another invasion of personal space and Perez got physical and didn't agree to him doing that, but it is for Katie H to do the complaining, if she doesn't , she's prepared to let it go isn't she. (that you Nadia ?? ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,503
|
And just when they start to get along and have a bit of fun, SOMEONE always has to ruin it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Budapest
Posts: 2,710
|
Quote:
Call the Police
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WHATM - RIP BB
Posts: 31,478
|
Stuart does have a point though ... if it had been any other HM than Perez .. action would have been taken by BB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,129
|
My advice to you is to open your window and yell 'IT'S NOT FAIR' at all your neighbours and stamp your feet as loud as you can.
If that doesn't sort Perez out, I don't know what will. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 522
|
She was laughing!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
If you don't like it then switch off. Ofcom aren't taking your complaint seriously, if anything they are laughing at it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: goo goo ka choo
Posts: 25,475
|
congratulations you must be so proud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lincs
Posts: 16,172
|
And then people wonder why Ch5 are too scared to have live streaming. Ofcom would be on permanent redial for some.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
Stuart does have a point though ... if it had been any other HM than Perez .. action would have been taken by BB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
Stuart does have a point though ... if it had been any other HM than Perez .. action would have been taken by BB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Shall I be the cat? =^..^=
Posts: 31,759
|
Quote:
Stuart does have a point though ... if it had been any other HM than Perez .. action would have been taken by BB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
And then people wonder why Ch5 are too scared to have live streaming. Ofcom would be on permanent redial for some.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,239
|
I watch Big Brother (and have done since the very first episode of BB1) because it is a fun programme. I don't want to see constant conflict. And Perez is causing 99% of the conflict in that house. And to those saying, "switch it off", no. I will not switch off because of the actions of one individual. If Perez was never in the house, this could've been one of the best ever series of CBB but it has been ruined by his gameplaying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,129
|
Quote:
Stuart does have a point though ... if it had been any other HM than Perez .. action would have been taken by BB
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:17.



