|
||||||||
I complained to Ofcom tonight for the first time |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 995
|
It really is a pity that you are not my neighbour: imagine how much fun you could have complaining to Neighbourhood Watch, much more fun than bothering Ofcom, with your seriously sad one complaint.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 952
|
Lol some ppl seem to be ignoring that Katie kept coming right into his face and saying "don't insult the British public"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: TCB@B/Ferry.Left The Building
Posts: 7,641
|
Quote:
Really are you that bored , if you watched the show Katie H got in to Perez face so many times she enjoyed the chase around the garden
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hebrides
Posts: 28,135
|
No you didn't .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,503
|
Quote:
What action did they take when Hopkins followed him everywhere he went spouting horrible abuse at him?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,479
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. I am glad someone has pointed it out, unfortunately this forum is not perhaps the best place for reasoned argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,860
|
Quote:
I watch Big Brother (and have done since the very first episode of BB1) because it is a fun programme. I don't want to see constant conflict. And Perez is causing 99% of the conflict in that house. And to those saying, "switch it off", no. I will not switch off because of the actions of one individual. If Perez was never in the house, this could've been one of the best ever series of CBB but it has been ruined by his gameplaying.
So, you have contacted OFCOM because... - You want a fun programme and there is too much arguing (a vital part of BB) - It's being ruined by game-playing (errm... in a GAMESHOW). Wow, I'm afraid those two points doesn't add up to an OFCOM call. OFCOM is for serious regulations being broken, people don't understand what OFCOM is actually for. Complaining about game-playing. Whatever next? Next time I will complain when I watch Pointless, "I am disgusted that Simon played a game and ended up winning that jackpot". |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
I watch Big Brother (and have done since the very first episode of BB1) because it is a fun programme. I don't want to see constant conflict. And Perez is causing 99% of the conflict in that house. And to those saying, "switch it off", no. I will not switch off because of the actions of one individual. If Perez was never in the house, this could've been one of the best ever series of CBB but it has been ruined by his gameplaying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 4,994
|
Quote:
I know.
Where do you buy the TVs that don't have an off switch? |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: south wales
Posts: 3,404
|
Quote:
I watch Big Brother (and have done since the very first episode of BB1) because it is a fun programme. I don't want to see constant conflict. And Perez is causing 99% of the conflict in that house. And to those saying, "switch it off", no. I will not switch off because of the actions of one individual. If Perez was never in the house, this could've been one of the best ever series of CBB but it has been ruined by his gameplaying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 239
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. Because he's gay and she's straight. And also even a cursory look would show the tone was one of fun, and not menace. Take a chill pill mate. ![]() Though I like that you took some action, I wish it'd been over something a bit more important and in the real world. Eg Like why our governments are allowing the global rich to take over the UK for starters. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,503
|
Quote:
Lets get this straight then.
So, you have contacted OFCOM because... - You want a fun programme and there is too much arguing (a vital part of BB) - It's being ruined by game-playing (errm... in a GAMESHOW). Wow, I'm afraid those two points doesn't add up to an OFCOM call. OFCOM is for serious regulations being broken, people don't understand what OFCOM is actually for. Complaining about game-playing. Whatever next? Next time I will complain when I watch Pointless, "I am disgusted that Simon played a game and ended up winning that jackpot". |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,744
|
Well Stuart all I can is that you are a very brave person to admit to that on here. Either that or you're an attention-seeking WUM
*licks your face, yum yum*
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
You are of course absolutely correct.
I am glad someone has pointed it out, unfortunately this forum is not perhaps the best place for reasoned argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Guarding Anne-the Klepto-666
Posts: 57,165
|
Quote:
I watch Big Brother (and have done since the very first episode of BB1) because it is a fun programme. I don't want to see constant conflict. And Perez is causing 99% of the conflict in that house. And to those saying, "switch it off", no. I will not switch off because of the actions of one individual. If Perez was never in the house, this could've been one of the best ever series of CBB but it has been ruined by his gameplaying.
She invaded his personal space by getting right up to his face when belittling him, he had to do summat, BB gave her the chance to complain but she chose not to as she knew she was equally in the wrong. |
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Guarding Anne-the Klepto-666
Posts: 57,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 103,785
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,034
|
The Katie and Perez show in its current format is getting stale and tired the new direction in which Perez was trying to drive it is just what it needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Shall I be the cat? =^..^=
Posts: 31,759
|
Quote:
Well Stuart all I can is that you are a very brave person to admit to that on here. Either that or you're an attention-seeking WUM
*licks your face, yum yum*
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 4,994
|
Quote:
It really is a pity that you are not my neighbour: imagine how much fun you could have complaining to Neighbourhood Watch, much more fun than bothering Ofcom, with your seriously sad one complaint.
![]() If I was going to complain Offcom, I would have complained when Perez was faking orgasms in the garden. No doubt Katie could have got him out, except then she would be sinking to his level. She did exactly the right thing in my opinion. With style
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East midlands
Posts: 3,163
|
(I have posted this in another thread) to be honest I think they both had a fun moment there for a change and reminded me of the old days of bb when housemates had fun in the house without an agenda - sorry but words fail why anyone would feel they should report this - as Katie confirmed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Smiley Ho ☺♪♫
Posts: 9,693
|
Quote:
And where do you live that people have no standards and no right to complain?
It also carries heavy audio and written warnings before the show and when they come back on air after each ad break. People with 'standards' wouldn't be cretinous enough to watch a programme they know they'd find offensive and they wouldn't be petty enough to complain about something they know others enjoy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8,737
|
Quote:
The Katie and Perez show in its current format is getting stale and tired the new direction in which Perez was trying to drive it is just what it needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 168
|
Stuart I agree with you But Perez will be kept in so don't bother voting people. As for Open Heart why did you say that Stuart complained because Perez is gay? I think licking someone's face it as bad as spitting, she could catch whatever he's got and I hate to think about that.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19.





*licks your face, yum yum*


