|
||||||||
I complained to Ofcom tonight for the first time |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,486
|
Quote:
Lets get this straight then.
So, you have contacted OFCOM because... - You want a fun programme and there is too much arguing (a vital part of BB) - It's being ruined by game-playing (errm... in a GAMESHOW). Wow, I'm afraid those two points doesn't add up to an OFCOM call. OFCOM is for serious regulations being broken, people don't understand what OFCOM is actually for. Complaining about game-playing. Whatever next? Next time I will complain when I watch Pointless, "I am disgusted that Simon played a game and ended up winning that jackpot". |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: austins gona clinch this
Posts: 3,374
|
Quote:
I know.
Where do you buy the TVs that don't have an off switch? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOOOOOOLOLOOL tena lady alert |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,860
|
Quote:
What a horrible, insensitive post. The OP was sharing their opinion, that they think the sexually provocative actions Perez uses when goading Katie were beyond what's acceptable. They shared with us that they'd reported it to Of com. Now that's their prerogative, and they should be respected for that, not humiliated and derided. I was thinking of reporting his overt, sexual goading myself. Sadly, Katie didn't want to kick up a fuss about it. I thought she was very fair, but I would have complained. She missed a trick there.
![]() All I did is that I broke down the post to find that the things he spoke about in theory isn't an OFCOM issue. This poster has a right to complain, but to CHANNEL 5, not OFCOM. If the poster wants the complaint to be taken seriously, Ch5 has a better chance on responding, not OFCOM. OFCOM isn't just some place where you can go and complain when you don't agree with something. It's for TV regulations. OFCOM ignores everything BB related unless there's an actual issue. Also, why target just my post when clearly others disagree with the OP. I respect opinions and all and the whole goading thing is fair (even though KH has repeatedly done this to Perez too), but I had to draw the line with "the gameplaying is ruining it", implying that the "gameplaying" aspect is one of the reasons for the complaint. Somehow I think gameplaying in a game show is not an OFCOM issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
It's not insensitive at all.
![]() All I did is that I broke down the post to find that the things he spoke about in theory isn't an OFCOM issue. This poster has a right to complain, but to CHANNEL 5, not OFCOM. If the poster wants the complaint to be taken seriously, Ch5 has a better chance on responding, not OFCOM. OFCOM isn't just some place where you can go and complain when you don't agree with something. It's for TV regulations. OFCOM ignores everything BB related unless there's an actual issue. Also, why target just my post when clearly others disagree with the OP. I respect opinions and all and the whole goading thing is fair (even though KH has repeatedly done this to Perez too), but I had to draw the line with "the gameplaying is ruining it", implying that the "gameplaying" aspect is one of the reasons for the complaint. Somehow I think gameplaying in a game show is not an OFCOM issue. Let's be honest here, the reason for complaining to OFCOM is ridiculous. The OP said that they have been watching since series 1 and this is the first time they have complained. Out of all of the things that has happened in Big Brother how on Earth was what we saw on tonight's HL's show worth complaining about ? We are all warned before the show every single night. People should be expecting anything to happen. To me it just sounds like the OP is annoyed because their most disliked HM is still in there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,540
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. Katie for the win |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,808
|
and people wonder why we don't have live streaming. This is exactly why. who can blame channel 5 for not having the LF when there will be viewers complaining at the drop of a hat?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 26
|
How does his behaviour effect your life? Does it? A choice of feeling you chose led you to complaining and writing your long arse message.. Happyness is a choice!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,295
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,405
|
Although I completely disagree with you reporting it to anyone, I'm glad you did because many on here would do exactly the same if it involved anyone they disliked doing what Perez did.
The people who are saying that Katie H got in his face and 'deserved it' as a result, remind me of those people who say girls wearing short skirts 'ask for it' when they are sexually assaulted. People have to have balance. It's sad to see people making excuses for someone trying to force themselves on a woman just because they don't happen to like Katie Hopkins. |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
Although I completely disagree with you reporting it to anyone, I'm glad you did because many on here would do exactly the same if it involved anyone they disliked doing what Perez did.
The people who are saying that Katie H got in his face and 'deserved it' as a result, remind me of those people who say girls wearing short skirts 'ask for it' when they are sexually assaulted. People have to have balance. It's sad to see people making excuses for someone trying to force themselves on a woman just because they don't happen to like Katie Hopkins. About the first bit in bold. The majority on here are sick of people running to OFCOM over the most ridiculous things. So no, you're wrong, nobody on here would run to OFCOM if the person they disliked did what Perez did. Now about the second bit in bold. What a ridiculous comparison to make, one of the many ridiculous comparisons i have seen on here of late. Katie said she was fine with it so what you are saying is just nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,405
|
Quote:
What a load of rubbish.
About the first bit in bold. The majority on here are sick of people running to OFCOM over the most ridiculous things. So no, you're wrong, nobody on here would run to OFCOM if the person they disliked did what Perez did. Now about the second bit in bold. What a ridiculous comparison to make, one of the many ridiculous comparisons i have seen on here of late. Katie said she was fine with it so what you are saying is just nonsense. It makes absolutely no difference if Katie was fine with it or not. If what Perez did has offended anyone, then Big Brother should act on it. Alexander didn't complain about Ken using the word negro, he still got kicked out for it. Stop trying to excuse the inexcusable actions of Perez simply because you dislike Katie Hopkins. It's not normal to base your judgements on hate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,405
|
There's apparently even more that was edited out:
In scenes not shown, Perez spent the evening “frantically thrusting his hips” at Katie before telling her to “lick it good, suck this d***, just like you should”, |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
It makes absolutely no difference if Katie was fine with it or not.
If what Perez did has offended anyone, then Big Brother should act on it. Alexander didn't complain about Ken using the word negro, he still got kicked out for it. Stop trying to excuse the inexcusable actions of Perez simply because you dislike Katie Hopkins. It's not normal to base your judgements on hate. And it does make a difference if Katie is fine with what Perez did, it made a huge difference. Her not complaining was the difference between telling if it was just harmless fun or Perez deliberately trying to make her uncomfortable. And i'm not making excuses for Perez because i dislike Katie. You are overreacting to what was clearly just a bit of fun between them. With the lack of fun between the two of them i would think you would have welcomed this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,023
|
Quote:
There's apparently even more that was edited out:
In scenes not shown, Perez spent the evening “frantically thrusting his hips” at Katie before telling her to “lick it good, suck this d***, just like you should”, |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,405
|
Quote:
Alexander told Ken not to say it again and was clearly annoyed at Ken for saying it so you got that wrong.
And it does make a difference if Katie is fine with what Perez did, it made a huge difference. Her not complaining was the difference between telling if it was just harmless fun or Perez deliberately trying to make her uncomfortable. And i'm not making excuses for Perez because i dislike Katie. You are overreacting to what was clearly just a bit of fun between them. With the lack of fun between the two of them i would think you would have welcomed this. In scenes not shown, Perez spent the evening “frantically thrusting his hips” at Katie before telling her to “lick it good, suck this d***, just like you should”, Yep, sounds like great fun
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
There's apparently even more that was edited out:
In scenes not shown, Perez spent the evening “frantically thrusting his hips” at Katie before telling her to “lick it good, suck this d***, just like you should”, |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,372
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. Do not lick me every again, is the closest she gets and shes laughing so hard and squealing chasing about the house. |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,405
|
Quote:
omg making up stuff doesnt make it true LOL Episode 22 at 20mins. Anyone can see that Katie is loving it and leans into his face squealing and giggling. SHE NEVER SAYS NO!!
Do not lick me every again, is the closest she gets and shes laughing so hard and squealing chasing about the house. That doesn't mean it's ok tho does it. People do nothing but moan day after day about people being offended by what Katie H has said. Yet although many people will be offended by Perez forcing himself onto a woman, apparently that's fine. There is something very very creepy about Perez. |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,098
|
DS trolled again by an OFCOM post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,746
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. We told on Monday how the show attracted a further 1,100 complaints in its second week to TV watchdog Ofcom. Every single episode attracted at least 10 complaints while a number saw over 100, with one episode seeing more than 800 people write in. They’re in addition to the 500 complaints in the opening week which saw the ejection of two housemates. Last night saw Perez Hilton return to the house and immediately wind up Katie Hopkins. While we did seen him chase, kiss and even LICK Katie, more of Perez’s antics were cut from the episode. In scenes not shown, Perez spent the evening “frantically thrusting his hips” at Katie before telling her to “lick it good, suck this d***, just like you should”, The Sun newspaper reports. The tabloid claims that bosses axed the segment due to “fearing a major backlash” from viewers. Read more: http://tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv/big...#ixzz3QB5rtef5 |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Andover
Posts: 16,805
|
Quote:
Perez's behaviour is out of control yet we haven't seen him receive a formal warning for it. Through giving him so much airtime, Channel 5 are justifying his behaviour and, as such, condoning it.
Tonight's episode was the last straw. When he tried to lick Katie Hopkins, she said no. When he chased her around the garden trying to kiss her, she said no. When she was talking to him, he tried to lick her again, she said no and moved away. Now, let's put 2 different housemates in the situation. Let's say Calum tried to repeatedly lick Cami against her consent. Or Ken chased Chloe around the garden in pursuit of a kiss. Both of those housemates would either be warned for their behaviour or removed from the house. Why has that not happened with Perez? By giving Perez a disproportionate amount of airtime, Channel 5 have effectively condoned his behaviour. His behaviour is upsetting the majority of fellow housemates and many viewers. Channel 5 need to be seen to be acting on this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,205
|
Quote:
I watch Big Brother (and have done since the very first episode of BB1) because it is a fun programme. I don't want to see constant conflict. And Perez is causing 99% of the conflict in that house. And to those saying, "switch it off", no. I will not switch off because of the actions of one individual. If Perez was never in the house, this could've been one of the best ever series of CBB but it has been ruined by his gameplaying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
Quoting the Sun......wow, now that is really reaching. You know somebody is desperate when they start taking gossip as truth.
( whispers) left winger |
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,625
|
Quote:
And when BB asked Hopkins if she was bothered, guess what?
She said NO. Put your hand on your heart, swear on your childs life in a Perez style before you answer this question - If it had been the other way around, Would Parez have done the same? Course he wouldn't! He would have been in the Diary room with the Rule book demanding to see the producers and KH would be removed, and Nadia would be defending him for doing so. Cue Perez/Nadia fans denying this, but you all know damn well its EXACTLY what would have happened. |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: looking for tinned loganberrie
Posts: 17,504
|
He asked her for 'one night of fun' - heaven help us if she ever agreed - I haven't seen either of them do anything yet I would regard as fun.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19.




