|
||||||||
"Dippy" Diplodocus Being Removed from London Natural History Museum Central Hall |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,732
|
"Dippy" Diplodocus Being Removed from London Natural History Museum Central Hall
I couldn't see a thread on this, nor does the search function seem to be working properly, but I wondered what people's thoughts were on this...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-31025229 It's very rare for me to disagree with investment in new ideas for museums, and I know the Central Hall has a history of a turnaround when it comes to its main attraction, but this is such an iconic staple of the museum's history! Whilst the Blue Whale is a very impressive animal, and it's a good thing to raise awareness of the giants alive today, the fact is that dinosaurs evoke something in the imagination that a mammal never will - especially for a child. It'll be such a shame to see the Diplodocus go. As a Natural History Museum, there are certain aspects that I feel don't need to be updated or modernised. It seems such a big fuss over a load of (replicated) bones but this is an icon that I'll miss for sure. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Crapville
Posts: 13,162
|
To be honest, I'd rather see a real blue whale skeleton than a plaster cast one of a dinosaur. If Diplodocus was a real skeleton then I would say keep it where it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,693
|
Rest in pieces Dippy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,774
|
I'm torn on this one.
Dippy is iconic and it seems a shame that children would no longer get that 'wow' when entering the Museum for the first time. On the other hand the Whale skeleton they are replacing it with is pretty impressive in its own right and deserves better than being in amongst the clutter in the mammal hall. I don't like the whole 'eco' thought behind the decision. But the end effect could be just as good as Dippy regardless of why. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,682
|
How do you pronounce diplodocus?
Dip-la-doe-cus Dip-plod-ih-cus |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,732
|
Quote:
I'm torn on this one.
In regards to the mammal hall though, I've always wondered about the long term prospects of the big Blue Whale replica they have in there. It's looking a little worse for wear these days, at least compared to the other major sublime exhibits of the museum. I feel that perhaps that room could do with a bit more of an overhaul, as it is very cluttered - and the only part of the museum I feel is awkward to get around. The Blue Whale skeleton could have easily take pride of place in there at some point in the future. I appreciate the conservation message that comes with putting a whale in that room, but then a Natural History Museum is about more than just conservation - particularly that one. It was in those halls that the term 'dinosaur' was coined, back in the 1820's. And replica or not, the image of a dinosaur as you walk in both inspires and evokes the imagination - something I just don't feel the whale will do in the same way. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 65,903
|
Quote:
To be honest, I'd rather see a real blue whale skeleton than a plaster cast one of a dinosaur. If Diplodocus was a real skeleton then I would say keep it where it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,732
|
Quote:
Yes, I think that is reasonable. The NHM is not a theme park, and it seems appropriate that they give priority to real skeletons and not speculative models.
![]() Quote:
Originally Posted by TrollHunter
How do you pronounce diplodocus?
Dip-la-doe-cus Dip-plod-ih-cus What's also interesting is how much the meaning of the name has been abbreviated over time. I've heard it's translation as 'double beam', though more commonly 'double folded beam' and then the extended title of 'Double Folded Bearing Beam'. That's such an awesome name for a dinosaur!
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 798
|
It isn't being disposed of. It's likely that it will be moved outside, to be displayed in the grounds of the museum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,422
|
Ho hum. Whale skeletons at the entrance are nothing new. I know there's one in Australia and i remember seeing one somewhere else. I think it was either in Canada or the U.S., i can't remember.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Taedet animam meam vitae
Posts: 40,368
|
The blue whale is one of the greatest creatures ever to evolve on our planet so I'm fairly happy with this change, especially if it's given a dynamic presentation. The diplodocus cast will still be on display elsewhere so it's not like it's disappearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 625
|
One of our dinosaurs is missing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 9,696
|
diplodicus. isnt that a fantastic word to say....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21,640
|
Quote:
It isn't being disposed of. It's likely that it will be moved outside, to be displayed in the grounds of the museum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 23,695
|
Judging by the CGI of what it will look like, not so impressed.
Also as there's the huge model as well, it's going a bit overboard on the whole whale thing. You do wonder sometimes if the people who run museums are not that impressed with what makes their museum so popular. People/children enjoy the dinosaurs, you get the feeling that there's some snobbishness about that. And the NHM might not be a theme park but they sure enjoy the money and prestige of it being so popular. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 981
|
I'm for it,a little change round now and then.Besides I think I Dippy has only been the front man since the 70's so it's not really an untouchable piece of Museum culture.
"Meet me under the whale. In the Natural History Museum" one for the oldies there |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Taedet animam meam vitae
Posts: 40,368
|
Quote:
Judging by the CGI of what it will look like, not so impressed.
Also as there's the huge model as well, it's going a bit overboard on the whole whale thing. You do wonder sometimes if the people who run museums are not that impressed with what makes their museum so popular. People/children enjoy the dinosaurs, you get the feeling that there's some snobbishness about that. And the NHM might not be a theme park but they sure enjoy the money and prestige of it being so popular. http://i.guim.co.uk/static/w-940/h--...2060x1331.jpeg Although presumably the main hall won't be otherwise totally empty of exhibits, as it appears to be in the CGI mock-ups. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 23,695
|
Quote:
I don't think it looks too bad:
http://i.guim.co.uk/static/w-940/h--...2060x1331.jpeg Although presumably the main hall won't be otherwise totally empty of exhibits, as it appears to be in the CGI mock-ups. All that lovely space and the NHM has a large amount of private commercial events after hours. If it's hanging from the ceiling, why isn't there room for both? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: blazes of hell and damnation
Posts: 7,158
|
Quote:
I couldn't see a thread on this, nor does the search function seem to be working properly, but I wondered what people's thoughts were on this...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-31025229 It's very rare for me to disagree with investment in new ideas for museums, and I know the Central Hall has a history of a turnaround when it comes to its main attraction, but this is such an iconic staple of the museum's history! Whilst the Blue Whale is a very impressive animal, and it's a good thing to raise awareness of the giants alive today, the fact is that dinosaurs evoke something in the imagination that a mammal never will - especially for a child. It'll be such a shame to see the Diplodocus go. As a Natural History Museum, there are certain aspects that I feel don't need to be updated or modernised. It seems such a big fuss over a load of (replicated) bones but this is an icon that I'll miss for sure. , does say when he will be taken down
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Back after a much-needed break
Posts: 6,406
|
Ooooh ... lots of people turning up to take a final look at Dippy in the entrance hall before he's moved out! How could that possibly benefit the NHM?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Planet Mongo.
Posts: 19,548
|
I'm of the age when I seem to recall him (her?) being described as a Brontosaurus I'm sure. I do think it is a shame that it is being moved but as long as he still gets a prime position to "wow" visitors then I guess that will still be ok.
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Planet Mongo.
Posts: 19,548
|
Quote:
Ooooh ... lots of people turning up to take a final look at Dippy in the entrance hall before he's moved out! How could that possibly benefit the NHM?
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Back after a much-needed break
Posts: 6,406
|
Quote:
Oh you cynic you...
![]() ![]() I'm sure the NHM has considered things very carefully, and I imagine a lot of people will turn up for a final look at Dippy before he's moved (or goes on tour). The announcement has already generated a fair bit of publicity ... and I'm all in favour of places such as the NHM getting as much publicity as they can, so even if it was a marketing-driven decision, I don't have a problem with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Drayton, Greater London
Posts: 27,611
|
Real skeleton > fake skeleton as far as I'm concerned. Stick-in-the-mud reactionaries be damned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,916
|
Dippy should stay! (of course)
In terms of engaging children in natural history, I have to say I think that a dino skeleton (albeit a replica one) outweighs a whale skeleton (and I used to work in a museum). |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:17.





, does say when he will be taken down
