DS Forums

 
 

"Dippy" Diplodocus Being Removed from London Natural History Museum Central Hall


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29-01-2015, 13:06
Abomination
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,732

I couldn't see a thread on this, nor does the search function seem to be working properly, but I wondered what people's thoughts were on this...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-31025229

It's very rare for me to disagree with investment in new ideas for museums, and I know the Central Hall has a history of a turnaround when it comes to its main attraction, but this is such an iconic staple of the museum's history!

Whilst the Blue Whale is a very impressive animal, and it's a good thing to raise awareness of the giants alive today, the fact is that dinosaurs evoke something in the imagination that a mammal never will - especially for a child.

It'll be such a shame to see the Diplodocus go. As a Natural History Museum, there are certain aspects that I feel don't need to be updated or modernised. It seems such a big fuss over a load of (replicated) bones but this is an icon that I'll miss for sure.
Abomination is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 29-01-2015, 13:11
TheTruth1983
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Crapville
Posts: 13,162
To be honest, I'd rather see a real blue whale skeleton than a plaster cast one of a dinosaur. If Diplodocus was a real skeleton then I would say keep it where it is.
TheTruth1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 13:11
BelfastGuy125
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,693
Rest in pieces Dippy
BelfastGuy125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 13:21
StressMonkey
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,774
I'm torn on this one.

Dippy is iconic and it seems a shame that children would no longer get that 'wow' when entering the Museum for the first time.

On the other hand the Whale skeleton they are replacing it with is pretty impressive in its own right and deserves better than being in amongst the clutter in the mammal hall.

I don't like the whole 'eco' thought behind the decision. But the end effect could be just as good as Dippy regardless of why.
StressMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 13:31
TrollHunter
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,682
How do you pronounce diplodocus?

Dip-la-doe-cus
Dip-plod-ih-cus
TrollHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 13:33
Abomination
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,732
I'm torn on this one.
I agree with you to some extent.

In regards to the mammal hall though, I've always wondered about the long term prospects of the big Blue Whale replica they have in there. It's looking a little worse for wear these days, at least compared to the other major sublime exhibits of the museum. I feel that perhaps that room could do with a bit more of an overhaul, as it is very cluttered - and the only part of the museum I feel is awkward to get around. The Blue Whale skeleton could have easily take pride of place in there at some point in the future.

I appreciate the conservation message that comes with putting a whale in that room, but then a Natural History Museum is about more than just conservation - particularly that one. It was in those halls that the term 'dinosaur' was coined, back in the 1820's. And replica or not, the image of a dinosaur as you walk in both inspires and evokes the imagination - something I just don't feel the whale will do in the same way.
Abomination is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 13:33
wonkeydonkey
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 65,903
To be honest, I'd rather see a real blue whale skeleton than a plaster cast one of a dinosaur. If Diplodocus was a real skeleton then I would say keep it where it is.
Yes, I think that is reasonable. The NHM is not a theme park, and it seems appropriate that they give priority to real skeletons and not speculative models.
wonkeydonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 13:37
Abomination
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,732
Yes, I think that is reasonable. The NHM is not a theme park, and it seems appropriate that they give priority to real skeletons and not speculative models.
It's not a speculative model, it's a replica of an actual fossil.

Originally Posted by TrollHunter
How do you pronounce diplodocus?

Dip-la-doe-cus
Dip-plod-ih-cus
I tend to opt for the second one, after hearing it pronoucned as such by Kenneth Branagh on Walking with Dinosaurs many years ago.

What's also interesting is how much the meaning of the name has been abbreviated over time. I've heard it's translation as 'double beam', though more commonly 'double folded beam' and then the extended title of 'Double Folded Bearing Beam'. That's such an awesome name for a dinosaur!
Abomination is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 14:03
ThatGuy11200
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 798
It isn't being disposed of. It's likely that it will be moved outside, to be displayed in the grounds of the museum.
ThatGuy11200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 14:09
dee123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,422
Ho hum. Whale skeletons at the entrance are nothing new. I know there's one in Australia and i remember seeing one somewhere else. I think it was either in Canada or the U.S., i can't remember.
dee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 14:09
Kapellmeister
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Taedet animam meam vitae
Posts: 40,368
The blue whale is one of the greatest creatures ever to evolve on our planet so I'm fairly happy with this change, especially if it's given a dynamic presentation. The diplodocus cast will still be on display elsewhere so it's not like it's disappearing.
Kapellmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 14:13
PeteA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 625
One of our dinosaurs is missing
PeteA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 14:24
Fairyprincess0
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 9,696
diplodicus. isnt that a fantastic word to say....
Fairyprincess0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 14:33
njp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21,640
It isn't being disposed of. It's likely that it will be moved outside, to be displayed in the grounds of the museum.
According to a spokesman on the Today programme, the existing Dippy is expected to go on tour, and a more durable replica is likely to be made to display outside.
njp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 14:42
Speak-Softly
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 23,695
Judging by the CGI of what it will look like, not so impressed.

Also as there's the huge model as well, it's going a bit overboard on the whole whale thing.

You do wonder sometimes if the people who run museums are not that impressed with what makes their museum so popular.
People/children enjoy the dinosaurs, you get the feeling that there's some snobbishness about that.

And the NHM might not be a theme park but they sure enjoy the money and prestige of it being so popular.
Speak-Softly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 14:49
donovan5
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 981
I'm for it,a little change round now and then.Besides I think I Dippy has only been the front man since the 70's so it's not really an untouchable piece of Museum culture.

"Meet me under the whale. In the Natural History Museum"
one for the oldies there
donovan5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 14:56
Kapellmeister
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Taedet animam meam vitae
Posts: 40,368
Judging by the CGI of what it will look like, not so impressed.

Also as there's the huge model as well, it's going a bit overboard on the whole whale thing.

You do wonder sometimes if the people who run museums are not that impressed with what makes their museum so popular.
People/children enjoy the dinosaurs, you get the feeling that there's some snobbishness about that.

And the NHM might not be a theme park but they sure enjoy the money and prestige of it being so popular.
I don't think it looks too bad:

http://i.guim.co.uk/static/w-940/h--...2060x1331.jpeg

Although presumably the main hall won't be otherwise totally empty of exhibits, as it appears to be in the CGI mock-ups.
Kapellmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 15:03
Speak-Softly
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 23,695
I don't think it looks too bad:

http://i.guim.co.uk/static/w-940/h--...2060x1331.jpeg

Although presumably the main hall won't be otherwise totally empty of exhibits, as it appears to be in the CGI mock-ups.
Want to bet?

All that lovely space and the NHM has a large amount of private commercial events after hours.

If it's hanging from the ceiling, why isn't there room for both?
Speak-Softly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 15:16
TardisSteve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: blazes of hell and damnation
Posts: 7,158
I couldn't see a thread on this, nor does the search function seem to be working properly, but I wondered what people's thoughts were on this...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-31025229

It's very rare for me to disagree with investment in new ideas for museums, and I know the Central Hall has a history of a turnaround when it comes to its main attraction, but this is such an iconic staple of the museum's history!

Whilst the Blue Whale is a very impressive animal, and it's a good thing to raise awareness of the giants alive today, the fact is that dinosaurs evoke something in the imagination that a mammal never will - especially for a child.

It'll be such a shame to see the Diplodocus go. As a Natural History Museum, there are certain aspects that I feel don't need to be updated or modernised. It seems such a big fuss over a load of (replicated) bones but this is an icon that I'll miss for sure.
i love Dippy, will be sad to to see him go , does say when he will be taken down
TardisSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 15:24
coughthecat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Back after a much-needed break
Posts: 6,406
Ooooh ... lots of people turning up to take a final look at Dippy in the entrance hall before he's moved out! How could that possibly benefit the NHM?
coughthecat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 15:26
Sniffle774
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Planet Mongo.
Posts: 19,548
I'm of the age when I seem to recall him (her?) being described as a Brontosaurus I'm sure. I do think it is a shame that it is being moved but as long as he still gets a prime position to "wow" visitors then I guess that will still be ok.
Sniffle774 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 15:26
Sniffle774
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Planet Mongo.
Posts: 19,548
Ooooh ... lots of people turning up to take a final look at Dippy in the entrance hall before he's moved out! How could that possibly benefit the NHM?
Oh you cynic you...
Sniffle774 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 15:34
coughthecat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Back after a much-needed break
Posts: 6,406
Oh you cynic you...
It didn't actually mean to be cynical!

I'm sure the NHM has considered things very carefully, and I imagine a lot of people will turn up for a final look at Dippy before he's moved (or goes on tour). The announcement has already generated a fair bit of publicity ... and I'm all in favour of places such as the NHM getting as much publicity as they can, so even if it was a marketing-driven decision, I don't have a problem with that.
coughthecat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 16:55
UKMikey
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Drayton, Greater London
Posts: 27,611
Real skeleton > fake skeleton as far as I'm concerned. Stick-in-the-mud reactionaries be damned.
UKMikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2015, 17:28
TelevisionUser
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,916
Dippy should stay! (of course)

In terms of engaging children in natural history, I have to say I think that a dino skeleton (albeit a replica one) outweighs a whale skeleton (and I used to work in a museum).
TelevisionUser is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:17.