• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Perez Hilton could be quizzed by police over ‘sexual harassment’ - finally.
<<
<
2 of 5
>>
>
Bonniekilty
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by SG-1:
“Your thread title is COMPLETELY misleading.

Note the words It has been claimed and could be.
Why does your thread title say to be quizzed?

Its a load of rubbish.”

Exactly.
auntysplat
30-01-2015
I am sure but at the start of show he was right in everyones face and was told about it,
LH1
30-01-2015
The Police are probably sick to death of Big Brother......
reader123
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by ennui:
“It is as contemptuous and hateful as spitting in someones face and a typical spiteful, concealed, passive-aggressive assault.”

Jeez, god help anyone who happens to sneeze in your direction, you will probably get them hung drawn and quartered.
SG-1
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by reader123:
“Jeez, god help anyone who happens to sneeze in your direction, you will probably get them hung drawn and quartered.”

LOL that is how silly its becoming.
amyawake
30-01-2015
How can it be sexual harassment if, when asked by BB if Hopkins minded, she replied no? Has she changed this, i.e. seen a way of disgracing Perez? If you recall, it was done on the night he wanted a truce and 'one night of fun'. He was playful with her, running around the garden....she did not appear to be traumatised in the least did she?
YesNoMan
30-01-2015
This thread is like that story about not being allowed to call blackboards blackboards any more. Utter balls invented to get people's dander up about "PC gone mad".
this_THAT
30-01-2015
this is why perez wont win big brother because of bs headlines like this
Tissy
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by ennui:
“It is as contemptuous and hateful as spitting in someones face and a typical spiteful, concealed, passive-aggressive assault.”

Are you being serious ??
Rough Diamond
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by reader123:
“You can't someone will call the police.”

HaHaha lol
SG-1
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by amyawake:
“How can it be sexual harassment if, when asked by BB if Hopkins minded, she replied no? Has she changed this, i.e. seen a way of disgracing Perez? If you recall, it was done on the night he wanted a truce and 'one night of fun'. He was playful with her, running around the garden....she did not appear to be traumatised in the least did she?”

Even Calum who does not like Perez said he has been pretty good apart from the gossip ( telling hms what was said behind their backs ).
If anything bad had happened that we had not been shown would Calum have said he currently has no problems with perez.
Its pure daily star fiction.
xXxAnneAxXx
30-01-2015
If this was a fact I would say 'the lunatics have truly taken over the asylum'
Since it clearly isn't i say .. The op should perhaps re watch the clip? to see what actually happened! Gobkins was unable to bear the fact that Perez was once again the star of the show and the centre of attention, she repeatedly shoved her beak into his face in a childlike attempt to grab some of that attention. The kiss chase round the house and garden was a dead give away, she loved it and encouraged it.
Sexual harassment ! .... Lol Pmsl
Philip_Clarke
30-01-2015
The thing is it's stupendously big deals made out of nonsence like this that make the very real cases of sexual harrasment get laughed out of court.

If Hopkins fels harrassesed she'd have said so when asked about it. It's not like she is the type to shy away from serious issues.

She didn't.

End of story.
Dangermoose
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by LH1:
“The Police are probably sick to death of Big Brother......”

Why should Ofcom be the only ones to suffer
yowie29
30-01-2015
i was more concerned when he was seen straddling Kav last night haha
Artemis1
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by Skepticism:
“If it happened to anyone else, he'd have been kicked out.”

Agreed and of course Jeremy is gone.

If Katie h had complained to bb when asked I think he would have gone.

If , as rumoured ,Perez has a secret pass to the final would police involvement make that contract invalid?

We will know tonight.
Dangermoose
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by yowie29:
“i was more concerned when he was seen straddling Kav last night haha”

Even he seemed to enjoy it. It's must have been a while
Toggler
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by beekmanhill:
“Someone is involving the police in this nonsense? Don't the police have real crimes to solve?”

Nadia phoned them of course, surely you knew that?
storminmike
30-01-2015
Key 103 were reporting that there was more...unseen that didn't make any edits, This may not be just about that particular confrontation
Dangermoose
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by storminmike:
“Key 103 were reporting that there was more...unseen that didn't make any edits, This may not be just about that particular confrontation”

Maybe there was but if this is the case, where are the complaints and outrage from the housemates?
If anything, they all seemed in relatively good spirits last night - even with Perez. Not really the behaviour of people in the wake of someone embarking on a sexual assault/harassment rampage
Conehead
30-01-2015
Hopkins loved flirting with Perez. He would be a challenge, and she needs a man who can control her.
storminmike
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by Dangermoose:
“Maybe there was but if this is the case, where are the complaints and outrage from the housemates?
If anything, they all seemed in relatively good spirits last night - even with Perez. Not really the behaviour of people in the wake of someone embarking on a sexual assault/harassment rampage”

TBF...if they edited out some behaviour they could edit out some reaction. They edited out the tanning...and all we saw was what looked like a dirty protest.
SG-1
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by storminmike:
“TBF...if they edited out some behaviour they could edit out some reaction. They edited out the tanning...and all we saw was what looked like a dirty protest.”

Could they also force Calum to say perez has been good since he got back,would nadia talk to perez if he had actually sexually assaulted a HM?
Would other HMs like Kav and Michelle allow him to straddle them ?

Besides if its not been shown anywhere how do key 103 know anything more than we know?
storminmike
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by SG-1:
“Could they also force Calum to say perez has been good since he got back,would nadia talk to perez if he had actually sexually assaulted a HM?
Would other HMs like Kav and Michelle allow him to straddle them ?

Besides if its not been shown anywhere how do key 103 know anything more than we know?”

Playing devils advocate

.... force Calum to say perez has been good since he got back...which implies perhaps past events..who knows!

how do key 103 know anything more than we know

I don't know but I heard it with my own ears...why would they make it up?
zx50
30-01-2015
Originally Posted by kingofthejungle:
“Wow if you get up that close to someones face you are harassing them - Perez is just saying you get that close to me I will lick you. This whole freakin show is steamrolling the men and the feminazis are all over it.”

Yeah, Hopkins should have removed herself from his personal space after Perez first attempted to lick her face when she got too close. I'm not going to defend Perez chasing her round the garden because I suppose he should have left her alone if she didn't want to be physically touched by him. She shouldn't have gotten as close to him a second time if she knew that he'd try and lick her though.
<<
<
2 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map