• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Sadistic motherfudgers
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
An Thropologist
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“In psychological rather than evolutionary/anthropological terms, tribalism is more about the 'self' as well as the social self. We're social animals and our self-concept is defined mostly in relation to others, e.g. there can be no 'fat' without a thin, no 'friendly' without an 'unfriendly'.”

Makes sense. And with a social group inevitably comes a social order.
Scarlet O'Hara
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“Oh God me too. And alarmingly I often see a lot of myself in the characters this audience (DS BB) despise. This time I see much of Nadia in myself. ”

And me. I think if most people are honest, there's some kind of identification going on with most of the HMs we like, even if it's just a couple of traits, or they remind us of someone else we love/d, or they're being treated in a way that reminds us of a situation we've been in.

Baggage, in other words.
amyawake
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“Oh God me too. And alarmingly I often see a lot of myself in the characters this audience (DS BB) despise. This time I see much of Nadia in myself. ”

Nadia has many redeeming qualities and many here could see that. Check out her popularity on the Nadia appreciation thread (top of main page).

However, she was somewhat preoccupied in trying to dispel arguments for which she earned a reputation as being someone who interferes. Unfortunate. I wish she had a chance to shine (she did for a day or so when Perez was away and the HMs warmed to her). Anyway she said she wasn't there for PR...she is secure in who she is and how popular she is. (She's been famous for a long time and has been an actress, e.g. in Eastenders, a presenter and even won Masterchef). I feel she is a wonderful, genuine woman.
Toggler
31-01-2015
Oh yes she is such a lovely, popular person - in her own mind. Carry on Nadia, you're as deluded as Denise Welch and those other harpies.
amyawake
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by Toggler:
“Oh yes she is such a lovely, popular person - in her own mind. Carry on Nadia, you're as deluded as Denise Welch and those other harpies.”

Who is Denise Welch? Ha...not on the same level, methinks.
Nice try but no dice.
Ms Ann Thrope
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by Toggler:
“Oh yes she is such a lovely, popular person - in her own mind. Carry on Nadia, you're as deluded as Denise Welch and those other harpies.”

You're brave to bring those sentiments into this thoughtful and intelligent thread.
An Thropologist
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by amyawake:
“Who is Denise Welch? Ha...not on the same level, methinks.
Nice try but no dice. ”

And not relevant to the thread topic either. Nevertheless instructive I think.

I wonder if it isn't so much a case of whether or not we enjoy sadism as such as how much time we are prepared to invest in thinking about what we are watching.

We seem to be in a 'like' button culture where the tendency is to skim over the surfuce passing our judgements on things; like this, hate that, lurve him, hate her etc. An opinion is pronounced without any real attempt to back it up or even explain the reasons behind that opinion. My gut feel is such opinions are formulated in the same knee jerk manner in which they are expressed. Hit the like button (or not) and the job is done.

Enjoying the sadism in this context may be more of a rather knee jerk and ill thought through way of simply hitting the dislike button.
eva_prior
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by calamity:
“No the BB mob are for giving them booze to party up until it ran out too early, then left them to argue with boredom...”

Irrespective of booze, the main basis of the show is about 'rejection' as a result of the process of nomination and eviction. The eviction days being eagerly anticipated, as a highlight.

With the presenter then probing the evictee (ultimately rejected person) as to how much pain and what type they are feeling for our entertainment.
eva_prior
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by planets:
“well some people quite obviously get off on being aggressive and mean.....other people can't stand to see people being victimised and attacked whether they are HMs or Fms and some people like to observe it all with a metaphoric lab coat and clip board.”

Originally Posted by eva_prior:
“But as that is a constant nowadays, why do we continue to watch ?

If the show was all HMs completely being nice to each other throughout. Would we still find it 'entertaining'?”

Originally Posted by planets:
“I mentioned a few distinct groups earlier, if you are not in the "gets off on aggression and being mean" group did either of the others ring a bell?
or
if it isn't filling our need to visit a modern day coliseum is it the modern day paying to watch the inmates at bedlam?”

Bib 1) No, please see my earlier response above. Furthermore, wrt metaphoric lab coat observer. I've realised a while ago that that isn't credible because:

- I usually start siding with one or more HMs, so am therefore no longer an independent/neutral observer. As I've become emotionally entwined with what I was observing, the stance of independent observer is no longer credible.

- There is no 'control' group to make an observation mode conclude any facts which are reliable or have validity.

Bib 2) So the same question arises, was watching the inmates satisfying our an innate sadistic need to see others in a distressful situation displaying pain?

Therefore, if C/BB viweing is it's modern day equivalent, was Perez right?
eva_prior
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by Ms Ann Thrope:
“It's a good point, and I think that may be the case for some viewers. I don't think I watch it in order to see people being abused, though.

It has become uncomfortable to watch and I think that's purely because of the kind of people they choose to put in there. It's ironic that the person who has accused the viewers of being sadistic is Perez Even though Michelle is not actually Gay, I'm referencing her as such due to her repeated statements that she is there on behalf of LGBT people.. Takes one to know one, by all accounts. Is he self aware enough to know of the hurt he himself has inflicted on his victims in the past? He claims to have turned over a new leaf, but that seems to be very difficult for him.

I don't want the show to be boring but on the other hand don't enjoy watching people tearing chunks off each other. Perez might be an irritant, but I can't help thinking that if Hopkins hadn't been in there pointing the finger, getting the others onside against him and winding him up like a toy, it would have been a very different show and his behaviour would have been seen in a different light. As nothing more than fooling around, rather than deranged and damaging.

They are a toxic combination.”

Putting the specifics of the current housemates aside - as very crudely speaking, previous series' show bullying in all its full spectrum, rejection (formal and informal) and the resultant inevitable pain as a result.

When we know that that is basically always going to be the plot to varying degrees with different 'players' why do we continue to watch the toxic combination?
eva_prior
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by viva.espana:
“Why do you think it has to be fulfilling some deep-seated need?

I watch it for entertainment. It doesn't always provide that but it usually provides enough to keep me watching to the end. Also, it's clear from the clips on the CBB website (that never get a showing on the HLs) that there's as much normal, nice, happy interaction as there is conflict so I don't agree at all that bullying, confrontation, rejection, pain etc is the order of the average CBB day.”



I think it has to be deep seated, as I know that consciously in my daily life, I do not enjoy seeing people engaging in or displaying your second BiBs.

Whilst I agree with your point that your second BiBs is not the order of the average day, it is however the bulk of the highlights show that we watch. Not to mention the raison d'être of the show being about norms and eviction, hence rejection and pain.
Vicky8675309
31-01-2015
Perez was right!

However we (humans) can also be masochistic (I was going to say "altruistic", which we can be, but masochistic fits better).
MargMck
31-01-2015
Originally Posted by eva_prior:
“Staying focused on your choice to watch CBB as an antidote to your highly focused work. Why does CBB fulfill this need as opposed to other shows that are on the TV at that moment in time?

What aspects of your highly focused work state are being neutralised by what aspects of CBB ?

Btw. Re football - I've always linked that with the primal need to be in the strongest hunting tribe. Yep, the football being the metaphorical dinosaur !”

Work is serious and I must avoid mistakes. To me CBB is a release from that, like adult panto crossed with American Wrestling, where we can boo, laugh etc and there are no important consequences because most of what we see is not real. It has a run like a panto and then it's gone.
I don't watch the soaps any more because they are depressing and need year round commitment. Films - well we know it's 100% drama (the actors simply reflect the required lines and emotion), I like action ones, but CBB has that lurid advantage of seeing people we might have watched / read about in the past but now in an alien setting and making arses of themselves, with some grudges or relationships forming, even though I think some of it partially scripted and definitely engineered.
The football - yes the tribal thing is there - I've been supporting the same team since I climbed out the pushchair.

ETA: In CBB I tend to "support" Marmite characters.
eva_prior
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by Ms Ann Thrope:
“One of the main problems for me now is the extent to which the producers will deliberately create tasks that are designed to set them at each others throats, over and over again.

In the old days, they would have their conflicts, work out their differences and then things would settle down. Nowadays it all seems so contrived and no sooner to things calm down a bit than they will get them doing face to face nominations, or guess who's the favourites, or playing them clips from the diary room, anything to stick the knife in and twist it.

It's the producers that are sadistic, although to an extent they are doing it because that's what gets the viewers in.

Perez may be right, but he can't claim any moral high ground.”

So they are feeding our sadistic need.

Does our sadistic appetite keep increasing because the producers keep ramping up the sadistic output, or are they meeting an ever increasing demand from us?
eva_prior
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by zx50:
“I don't enjoy seeing people feeling isolated, but Perez isn't bothered if the other housemates speak to him or not. I enjoy watching arguments in the highlights show. I don't think Perez has been bullied if that's what you're saying. For someone to be bullied, it has to bother that person. The negative treatment has to be affecting the person. Perez hasn't shown any negative impact at all.”

No - my OP is actually not specific to this series or any HMs, but just a geneic bit of self analysis triggered by Perez' comment.
Dave_62
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by eva_prior:
“Bullying, confrontation, rejection, pain, etc. seem to be the main ingredients of C/BB.

So as viewers, why do we continue to watch?

What deep-seated need is viewing it fulfilling in us?

Was Perez right?”

It's television, it's not reality.
eva_prior
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“I'm a hopeful masochist. I keep hoping they'll have more of the 'people just being people' element and less of the bear-baiting/roman coliseum stuff and yet I know rationally this isn't going to happen.

The show does challenge me though. It challenges me to observe my thoughts and question my judgement. I've learned a lot about myself watching Big Brother over the years.

I actually find the forum more depressing than the show itself tbh, especially if it's an indicator of what many humans are like deep down, under the cover of anonymity. That said, there are many many posters who don't behave like rabid hatemongers and whose thoughts or personalities I enjoy, even if I don't agree with them.”

Bib 1) Would it be interesting if HMs just did regular things like us. Would we tune in and be bothered to post on a chat forum then? I'm personally inclined to say that such a show wouldn't attract my attention.

Bib 2) SNAP !

I find the forum easier to manage (psychologically), as I am in control as to which threads I open, whom I choose to interact with etc.
eva_prior
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by Dave_62:
“It's television, it's not reality.”

I think Im gonna have to award you 'sweetest post' on this thread for that Dave_62.
eva_prior
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by **JennaJ**:
“There's always someone that has to bring the tone of the forum down Eva....... ”

Too right.

Originally Posted by planets:
“*dances round thread in hot pants and feather boa eating fudge*”

We knew you were coming - see JJ's post above.

Originally Posted by **JennaJ**:
“Told ya!...... ”

You can now rest your (Samsonite) case.
An Thropologist
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by MargMck:
“Work is serious and I must avoid mistakes. To me CBB is a release from that, like adult panto crossed with American Wrestling, where we can boo, laugh etc and there are no important consequences because most of what we see is not real. It has a run like a panto and then it's gone.
I don't watch the soaps any more because they are depressing and need year round commitment. Films - well we know it's 100% drama (the actors simply reflect the required lines and emotion), I like action ones, but CBB has that lurid advantage of seeing people we might have watched / read about in the past but now in an alien setting and making arses of themselves, with some grudges or relationships forming, even though I think some of it partially scripted and definitely engineered.
The football - yes the tribal thing is there - I've been supporting the same team since I climbed out the pushchair.

ETA: In CBB I tend to "support" Marmite characters.”

That would seem to fall into the catharsis bucket. Its a bit like High Court Judges visiting dominatrices who put them in chains or nappies etc; only cheaper and less icky.

Seriously though more like Tom and Jerry which was extraordinarily violent. Yet one could escape into a world that was safe because nobody including the characters themselves ever got hurt, or if they did they popped back into shape again.

Now I come to think of it I suppose the same can be said off BB survivors. I am sure some do go through real pain during the time in the house but they all seem to come out unscathed in the end. I am trying to think of anyone whose character or well being has been irrevocably damaged by BB.
eva_prior
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“I'd go one further and say the producers now deliberately toy with viewers too. I don't know if they hold viewers in contempt (although they might), but they do seem to be choosing more and more decisions that they KNOW will cause uproar.

We've known for years they stay on top of twitter and forum feedback, because a lot of the footage or tasks will play to whatever the prevailing opinion is on HM X. So by the same token, they will surely know what pisses their audiences off....things like HMs arbitrarily chosen for secret rooms, passes to the final, eviction immunity for the most controversial HM, too much external feedback given to HMs, rescinded immunity for another favourite HM, etc.

Everything they do is contrived for maximum controversy. And I don't think they'll pull back until something goes horribly wrong and they're found liable. Since race-gate, they over-react to the slightest whisper of a 'race issue'. So they're quite prepared to be tough when there's a risk to THEM. But it'll take something like an actual fight with proper violence and not just some shouting, spitting or throwing tables around before they stop trying to wind the HMs up. And I'm sure it will happen eventually.”

I think 'maximum controversy' is merely a means to an end. The end obviously being 'maximum income'. I don't think they care about pissing us off per se. As they are basically just thinking of ways to increase votes hence profits.

Agree about their over-management of race incidents. This is what actually gives the Equality Movement the 'looney leftie' tag. It actually damages the cause. I think I'm channelling my inner Michelle now!
Ms Ann Thrope
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by eva_prior:
“So they are feeding our sadistic need.

Does our sadistic appetite keep increasing because the producers keep ramping up the sadistic output, or are they meeting an ever increasing demand from us?”

I think the law of diminishing returns is a factor here. They have to keep upping the ante and over sensationalise the sadistic output in order to achieve the same level of shock value.

The editorial direction is not the same as it was, they are targetting a different demographic and those of us who enjoyed the old style are surplus to requirements. The new demographic may well prefer the sadism and certainly seem to enjoy elevating the crass boorish housemates to winners.

There were many times in the past that i didnt much like the winner, but you could usually count on the really nasty characters being shown the door before they got anywhere near the final. That at least brought a sense of satisfaction to the proceedings. You could put up with your favourite not winning as long as the truly objectionable one went home early, but theres no guarantee of that now.

What do we get out of it now? I dont know. I have simply grown tired of some of the previous shows. Didnt watch the one with Jim Davidson, didnt watch the one with Gina Rio. I often cant find a single HM to like any more.

It may be time for me to finally close the door on BB. Watching people suffer for no good reason isnt my idea of entertainment.
planets
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by eva_prior:
“I think 'maximum controversy' is merely a means to an end. The end obviously being 'maximum income'. I don't think they care about pissing us off per se. As they are basically just thinking of ways to increase votes hence profits.

Agree about their over-management of race incidents. This is what actually gives the Equality movement the 'looney leftie' tag. It actuallydamages the cause. I think I'm channelling my inner Michelle now!”

*passes t-shirt and a mirror so you can put your make up on*
eva_prior
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by planets:
“*passes t-shirt and a mirror so you can put your make up on*”

*completes image with a haughty sneer*
planets
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by eva_prior:
“*completes image with a haughty sneer*”

Your Community awaits....*curtsies*
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map