Calum isn't going to say I fear for my safety though and that isn't because he is decent necessarily but because he'd be embarrassed to say it so he uses his own best method to try to get rid. Different words, same hoped for desire.

My point is, if Katie hadn't had another go at Keith, then Callum and Perez wouldn't have had the argument they had and Perez wouldn't have said what he did. Perez was wrong for saying it and was quite rightly punished and should apologise, but what I'm saying is, it was caused by Katie yet again being unable to resist making a dig about someone. It's not Katie's fault that Perez made the comment, but it was STARTED by her.

Probably not shown everything ,and since when have BB shown H/Ms the actual footage of the incident rather than just read them a Transcript like the Article states Perez watching the footage and still claiming he needs pointing out which part was wrong and he can't see it

Not really ,Callum saying i hope to see him go and he doesn't deserve to be here would've been talking about the impending Eviction that night in all likelyhood ,in that he hoped Perez is the one going that night

Maybe the same desire but it wont be the same results

I doubt that Callum has studied the rule book as much as Perez and hasnt got a raft of lawyers on standby

It all comes down to wording and how that wording lines up with the rule book and Perez knows exactly what wording to use to get what he wants

I thought the article was trying to link the 2 arguments but doing so badly. However I went to read the actual article and it actually looks different to the OP's http://tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv/big...-language.html

There is no linking of the 2 incidents (ETA other than mentioning that Nadia said Katie started it) and it is not described as a final warning.

Yes, I'm one of them!

...the "lack of demand" once peddled as a reason for no live feed IMO was a smokescreen for storyline manipulation. Plenty has gone on which I doubt we'll ever find out unless someone spills the beans. Even that can't be assured of as Nadia is far from a reliable witness. I do wonder how "tellymix" get their transcripts or are they just extracts from show reels prior to transmission.

Regardless of which I smell another fix on Monday to save Perez a little longer before he's removed

I don't think Nadia was lying, Katie started something that spilled over and then Perez finished it. Not hard to understand is it?

I don't agree with the premise of your argument. I believe Jeremy was thrown out because he exposed a woman's breast against her will and Ken because of the language he used and the complaints from many HMs. As for Alexander, he left of his own volition.

FFS go and read it again, she started the row with Keith, he went back into the kitchen to discuss it with the others then Callum had his say and started an argument with Perez.

They were two completely arguments imo.

Tenuous at best

Chinese develop rockets......Nasa land a man on the moon

Nadia and Keith argue about Kav's level of intoxication>>>>Kieth goes to Kitchen and regales that Katie Hopkins is starting an argument based on a half heard private conversation>Calum tries to defuse the situation but Perez goes off on one about an unrelated where Calum switched off the bedroom lights>frustrated Calum suggests Perez is being a dick>Perez turns it dick placement argument

Katie and Keith had a row in the bedroom. Keith left the room and went into the kitchen just before Calum and Perez kicked off. Katie was still in the bedroom. It was two completely unrelated rows that are being linked because if the timing. Not at all hard to understand really

Go back further. Katie wouldn't have had a go at Keith if Keith and Nadia hadn't been talking about Kav and his drinking. dun dun dun. It's really Nadia's fault!

It's an unrelated argument with Perez and Calum's argument being unrelated to Keith and Katie's. Imagine you're in a bar and two people start fighting. Over in the corner, one random person decides to hit another. Are you going to fault the initial two people for the second fight? No.

Agreed....the only common denominator is actually KEITH

It's Kav's fault for drinking, or
It's BBs fault for giving Kav some alcopop

So it's all bloody Cheggers fault

Throw him out BB, he's trouble

Mmmmmmmm .....

Maybe that is why OP didn't post a link

You have the wrong article from tellymix.


The OP didn't do anything but copy the article. This is the link, it's taken directly from tellymix
http://tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv/big...est-fight.html

Now that is weird look at this link http://tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv/big...-language.html

They are different in several respects.

As a Perez fan, I cannot disagree with your summation.

Nothing weird. Yours is a quick initial article (posted at 2:34), OP selected the follow up article with more details (posted at 15:13). It says "blow by blow account."

Yes but they talk about the same incident but with quite different features and headline One says 'Final formal warning' and the other says 'Warned (again)'