• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Music
Gary Glitter is number 9 on amazon rock
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
jimmy_reed
01-02-2015
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/bestselle...music_1_3_last
the comeback of all comebacks? or may open a debate on the fact that music is still allowed to be popular/bought even if the performer is an evil c&^%
EyeballEyeball
01-02-2015
People still buy Wackos music and he f*cked kids as well.
jimmy_reed
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by EyeballEyeball:
“People still buy Wackos music and he f*cked kids as well.”

good point, but if Glitter got back in the charts The Sun newspaper would be p!ssed off
Will_Bee
01-02-2015
Below are couple of quotes from reviews from the Amazon page

1 Feb. 2015 By Mrs Jean Dornan
Great song from a great man the one and only GG


1 Feb. 2015 Gillian Thumwood
Fab song by a wonderful entertainer! We're all behind you Gary!


Are these people right in the head?
Doghouse Riley
01-02-2015
Garry's music is still popular in the States, he earns hundreds of thousands in royalties each year. Sports events still use it, particularly Ice hockey games. Most Americans haven't a clue who he is, they just like the tunes.
jackol
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by Doghouse Riley:
“Garry's music is still popular in the States, he earns hundreds of thousands in royalties each year. Sports events still use it, particularly Ice hockey games. Most Americans haven't a clue who he is, they just like the tunes.”

He sold all his royalty rights a while ago
jimmy_reed
01-02-2015
if it keeps selling well he could be celebrating a number one in prison
Doghouse Riley
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by jackol:
“He sold all his royalty rights a while ago”

Really?

http://www.theguardian.com/music/201...lties-oasis-1m
BRITLAND
01-02-2015
I can see it now, when Xmas comes the anti-X Factor campaigners using Glitter songs to prevent Simon getting the no1, the thought of Glitter getting it and being played on R1 :O
jimmy_reed
01-02-2015
how weird does this look ? http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/movers-an..._bs_tab_t_bsms
Doghouse Riley
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by jimmy_reed:
“how weird does this look ? http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/movers-an..._bs_tab_t_bsms ”

Well.. When there's money in it for Amazon.

If I wanted it I'd have downloaded this an an mp3.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpAYBsWcLuM
elnombre
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by EyeballEyeball:
“People still buy Wackos music and he f*cked kids as well.”

Assuming you're referring to Michael Jackson, bit of a difference, given with the first allegations Jordy Chandler supposedly later admitted he was lying and was legally emancipated from his parents, his dad who supposedly coached him on what to say later killing himself. With the second round of allegations he was found innocent on all counts.

Worth a read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Chandler

Glitter was not.
Doghouse Riley
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by elnombre:
“Assuming you're referring to Michael Jackson, bit of a difference, given with the first allegations Jordy Chandler supposedly later admitted he was lying and was legally emancipated from his parents, his dad who supposedly coached him on what to say later killing himself. With the second round of allegations he was found innocent on all counts.

//////.”

This may be true, but he was still "Wacko."
dearmrman
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by elnombre:
“Assuming you're referring to Michael Jackson, bit of a difference, given with the first allegations Jordy Chandler supposedly later admitted he was lying and was legally emancipated from his parents, his dad who supposedly coached him on what to say later killing himself. With the second round of allegations he was found innocent on all counts.

Glitter was not.”

No he wasn't...he was found not guilty...not the same as innocent. Though he did love to sleep with strangers children.

http://www.thistangledweb.co.uk/usef...-a-peadophile/

Remind you of anyone?
elnombre
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by Doghouse Riley:
“This may be true, but he was still "Wacko."”

And being weird means you deserve to go down in history as a nonce?
Doghouse Riley
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by elnombre:
“And being weird means you deserve to go down in history as a nonce?”

He's dead. It hardly matters what he goes down as, it can't hurt him. People will think what they like about him, neither you nor I can make any difference..
jimmy_reed
01-02-2015
Originally Posted by Doghouse Riley:
“Well.. When there's money in it for Amazon.

If I wanted it I'd have downloaded this an an mp3.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpAYBsWcLuM”

that is the song
Glawster2002
03-02-2015
Originally Posted by jimmy_reed:
“http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/bestselle...music_1_3_last
the comeback of all comebacks? or may open a debate on the fact that music is still allowed to be popular/bought even if the performer is an evil c&^%”

Why shouldn't his music still be popular or purchased?

I'm not condoning what he did, far from it, but that shouldn't mean he is air-brushed from history and that goes for anyone else who does similar.

After all you can still buy all of the Lost Prophets albums on Amazon as well.
walterwhite
03-02-2015
Originally Posted by EyeballEyeball:
“People still buy Wackos music and he f*cked kids as well.”

No he didn't, unless you have any proof.

While we're on the subject, Glitter hasn't ever been convicted of f*cking a kid either.
JurassicMark
03-02-2015
Originally Posted by jimmy_reed:
“good point, but if Glitter got back in the charts The Sun newspaper would be p!ssed off”

That's a good enough reason for me to buy it.
Los_Tributos
03-02-2015
Originally Posted by walterwhite:
“No he didn't, unless you have any proof.

While we're on the subject, Glitter hasn't ever been convicted of f*cking a kid either.”

No just wanking off to pictures of other people doing it.
walterwhite
04-02-2015
Originally Posted by Los_Tributos:
“No just wanking off to pictures of other people doing it.”

A bit more than that over in Vietnam as well.
Rijowhite
04-02-2015
Originally Posted by elnombre:
“Assuming you're referring to Michael Jackson, bit of a difference, given with the first allegations Jordy Chandler supposedly later admitted he was lying and was legally emancipated from his parents, his dad who supposedly coached him on what to say later killing himself. With the second round of allegations he was found innocent on all counts.

Worth a read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Chandler

Glitter was not.”

Exactly spot on. I wish people would look into this a bit deeper... As for Glitter, I can't believe his sales have gone up radically even with his Court Case. Shocked! Used to love his 'Rock n Roll Christmas'...he's killed a bit of the holiday season for me. That's a crime too!
dearmrman
04-02-2015
Originally Posted by Rijowhite:
“Exactly spot on. I wish people would look into this a bit deeper... As for Glitter, I can't believe his sales have gone up radically even with his Court Case. Shocked! Used to love his 'Rock n Roll Christmas'...he's killed a bit of the holiday season for me. That's a crime too!”

What is spot on is that MJ slept with kids...fact! and that is just not right regardless if anything sexual took place or not, and there is no justification for it whatsoever.
walterwhite
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by dearmrman:
“What is spot on is that MJ slept with kids...fact! and that is just not right regardless if anything sexual took place or not, and there is no justification for it whatsoever.”

I agree, it's not right. But it's a massive step removed from saying he f*cked kids.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map