They don't have any proof Jackson did those things.
Gary Glitter is number 9 on amazon rock
2 of 2
Originally Posted by dearmrman:
“What is spot on is that MJ slept with kids...fact! and that is just not right regardless if anything sexual took place or not, and there is no justification for it whatsoever.”
“What is spot on is that MJ slept with kids...fact! and that is just not right regardless if anything sexual took place or not, and there is no justification for it whatsoever.”
Yes I should probably have chosen my words a bit better. I agree it's not normal, though none of MJ's life was...HIStory (see what I did there...
) was one of the most tragic of all showbiz stories. As a previous poster said though that doesn't mean anything sexual happened. Innocent until proven guilty and all that...I couldn't support anyone found guilty of such a crime...Which leads us back to Paul Gadd...***shakes head***. I still can't believe people are buying his music despite being found guilty years ago somewhere else. This verdict today should vindicate the general public not buying his music.
Originally Posted by elnombre:
“Assuming you're referring to Michael Jackson, bit of a difference, given with the first allegations Jordy Chandler supposedly later admitted he was lying and was legally emancipated from his parents, his dad who supposedly coached him on what to say later killing himself. With the second round of allegations he was found innocent on all counts.
Worth a read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Chandler
Glitter was not.”
“Assuming you're referring to Michael Jackson, bit of a difference, given with the first allegations Jordy Chandler supposedly later admitted he was lying and was legally emancipated from his parents, his dad who supposedly coached him on what to say later killing himself. With the second round of allegations he was found innocent on all counts.
Worth a read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Chandler
Glitter was not.”
That is exactly what i thinking. Looking back at Michael Jackson's life and the way he isolated himself from society it seems unlikely he engaged in any sexual offending of minors. You look at Gary Glitter and his pal Jimmy Savill, they prowled on the backstage on shows, children's homes, hospitals etc to prey on their victims at any given opportunity.
Originally Posted by walterwhite:
“No he didn't, unless you have any proof.
While we're on the subject, Glitter hasn't ever been convicted of f*cking a kid either.”
“No he didn't, unless you have any proof.
While we're on the subject, Glitter hasn't ever been convicted of f*cking a kid either.”
He has now.
Originally Posted by eugenespeed:
“He has now.”
“He has now.”
Well no he still hasn't actually. But he's still an abhorrent human being and I hope he rots in jail.
Originally Posted by walterwhite:
“Well no he still hasn't actually. But he's still an abhorrent human being and I hope he rots in jail.”
“Well no he still hasn't actually. But he's still an abhorrent human being and I hope he rots in jail.”
Quote:
“The 70-year-old former singer - real name Paul Gadd - was convicted of attempted rape, four counts of indecent assault and one of having sex with a girl under the age of 13.”
“The 70-year-old former singer - real name Paul Gadd - was convicted of attempted rape, four counts of indecent assault and one of having sex with a girl under the age of 13.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31153633
Originally Posted by walterwhite:
“I stand corrected. I thought he was not guilty of all the sex charges, clearly not.”
“I stand corrected. I thought he was not guilty of all the sex charges, clearly not.”
You were right with one thing you said, hope he does rot.
Originally Posted by hazydayz:
“They don't have any proof Jackson did those things.”
“They don't have any proof Jackson did those things.”
Maybe not,but its still obvious that he was a child rapist.
Originally Posted by james_mason1:
“Maybe not,but its still obvious that he was a child rapist.”
“Maybe not,but its still obvious that he was a child rapist.”
Oh give over, it's not obvious at all. Where is the evidence? And don't say 'he slept in the same bed as kids', that's pathetic and is not evidence.
Originally Posted by walterwhite:
“Oh give over, it's not obvious at all. Where is the evidence? And don't say 'he slept in the same bed as kids', that's pathetic and is not evidence.”
“Oh give over, it's not obvious at all. Where is the evidence? And don't say 'he slept in the same bed as kids', that's pathetic and is not evidence.”
It was in 1999 that Glitter stupidly took his computer to be fixed leaving his collection of child porn on it. Yesterday 16 years later he was finally sentenced - as and you found out you could claim he didn't rape children in the laws eyes, now finally 2 says after your post you can't.
It's taken a massive overhaul of the laws, and a new task force setup in the wake of the Jimmy Savale scandal, for this to happen.
Jacko was much more powerful than Glitter and with the greatest respect the US law system is way more ******* than the UK. Remenber this is a country where the law 'decided' OJ wasn't guilty.
Originally Posted by rfonzo:
“Looking back at Michael Jackson's life and the way he isolated himself from society it seems unlikely he engaged in any sexual offending of minors.”
“Looking back at Michael Jackson's life and the way he isolated himself from society it seems unlikely he engaged in any sexual offending of minors.”
I think it's quite possible that MJ, being so weird, could actually have had kids "sleep over" while actually doing nothing sexual to them.
Originally Posted by EyeballEyeball:
“People still buy Wackos music and he f*cked kids as well.”
“People still buy Wackos music and he f*cked kids as well.”
Considering he was acquitted of all charges, your claim of "he f*cked kids" is completely wrong.
Originally Posted by Soupietwist:
“It was in 1999 that Glitter stupidly took his computer to be fixed leaving his collection of child porn on it. Yesterday 16 years later he was finally sentenced - as and you found out you could claim he didn't rape children in the laws eyes, now finally 2 says after your post you can't.
It's taken a massive overhaul of the laws, and a new task force setup in the wake of the Jimmy Savale scandal, for this to happen.
Jacko was much more powerful than Glitter and with the greatest respect the US law system is way more ******* than the UK. Remenber this is a country where the law 'decided' OJ wasn't guilty.”
“It was in 1999 that Glitter stupidly took his computer to be fixed leaving his collection of child porn on it. Yesterday 16 years later he was finally sentenced - as and you found out you could claim he didn't rape children in the laws eyes, now finally 2 says after your post you can't.
It's taken a massive overhaul of the laws, and a new task force setup in the wake of the Jimmy Savale scandal, for this to happen.
Jacko was much more powerful than Glitter and with the greatest respect the US law system is way more ******* than the UK. Remenber this is a country where the law 'decided' OJ wasn't guilty.”
So your basis for Jackson f*cking kids is that the law in the U.S. is a bit slow? Fantastic.
As for O.J. there are miscarriages of justice in every country, I could give you a big list of miscarriages in the U.K.
Originally Posted by walterwhite:
“So your basis for Jackson f*cking kids is that the law in the U.S. is a bit slow? Fantastic.
”
“So your basis for Jackson f*cking kids is that the law in the U.S. is a bit slow? Fantastic.
”
Two days ago you posted 'Glitter hasn't ever been convicted of f*cking a kid either.'
I'm not saying Jackson had sex with children, but I certainly wouldn't be surprised if he did.
Originally Posted by Soupietwist:
“Two days ago you posted 'Glitter hasn't ever been convicted of f*cking a kid either.'
I'm not saying Jackson had sex with children, but I certainly wouldn't be surprised if he did.”
“Two days ago you posted 'Glitter hasn't ever been convicted of f*cking a kid either.'
I'm not saying Jackson had sex with children, but I certainly wouldn't be surprised if he did.”
How is that relevant exactly?
Originally Posted by David_Crowley:
“Considering he was acquitted of all charges, your claim of "he f*cked kids" is completely wrong.”
“Considering he was acquitted of all charges, your claim of "he f*cked kids" is completely wrong.”
Paying of your rape victims doesn't make you innocent.
Originally Posted by EyeballEyeball:
“Paying of your rape victims doesn't make you innocent.”
“Paying of your rape victims doesn't make you innocent.”
I think the word you are looking for is 'alleged'. And yes, he was found not guilty, whatever you say.
2 of 2
