What a fantastic move that would be! Showing the audience that if you are strong enough you can corral a house full of apparently strong characters, and even a nation, into being complicit in the bullying of an individual, albeit an irritating individual.

Now that would be awesome.

No.. Because people have been paying money to keep KH in. It might be 'awsome' if the public where in on the plot but otherwise no.

She's too thick to pull off something like that.

This.

But wouldn't that be the genius behind it? That BB isn't only a study into behaviour of people in the house but also the watching audience?

An exposé of the blanket anti-bullying message that we all apparently sign up to when we really just mean anti-bullying of people we like.

Telling the audience of this would negate the study into all of our behaviours when faced with non-linear taboos. Maybe a look at our reaction to classic bullying behaviour when the 'bullied' is so dislikable is necessary. Are we really as fair as we like to think?

It would be an interesting social experiment for certain

No.
she's a nasty b*tch outside the house so why would she be different inside ?

Well, seemingly, by her behaviour in the house she is exhibiting a low level of emotional intelligence.

Yeah, it would be a great flip and I'd love if it were true since I've been trying - and failing - to find one redeemable aspect of Hopkins' personality.

Both her and Perez are playing up to the characters they have been Cast and Paid for by BB

That would take astuteness, intelligence, good intuition and the ability to read people. None of which she has.

Wonder which poster could be Katie H ?

Well either she's a complete moron content to exist on the same intellectual plain as Perez or this is part of an elaborate rouse she is playing on the entire nation.

Or I've watched Usual Suspects one too many times.

"Mr Soze will not be very happy..."

Oh if only Hopkins had a bit of the Keiser Soze about her, she could have spun an intricate web over the house and entrapped them all. Unfortunately, intellectually I don't think there is any difference between her and Perez. But maybe Keith. It has to be the one you least expect.

If she's trolling us then she's been doing it for years.
Which isn't impossible.

Yeah, pretty much this! She ain't got it.

If she could blow smoke up my ass, I think I would detect some leakage, so - no.

It would! ...But then you'd get into the murky moral area of the fact that her experiment involved making a non-complicit character an actual victim of the bullying!

The reason why I like her is because I realised years ago that she was trolling everyone. I like Josie Cunningham for the same reason. The funniest thing about both of them though is the reaction to their trolling, some examples of which are in this very thread in fact haha.
Glad that others are catching on to the queen of wind ups. But don't tell everyone because it won't be as funny without the frothing at the mouth responses to her every utterance. It's better when they take it for realz. Anyway, do you really think Pip Schofield would socialise with her so often if she was REALLY that awful? of course he wouldn't.

It would be better if Hopkins and Parez were in it together. One to play the bully, the other the victim.

That will be her excuse to counteract the backlash. Tiresome bag of mostly water.