• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Worst show of the series?
MrBing
02-02-2015
Two hours of utter ****. Awkward mixture of BOTS, frustrating lack of highlights and a weak twist which failed to replicate the impact it had last year.

Plus the scheduling was awful, I'm expecting the worst ratings of the series.
chachachavvy
02-02-2015
Boring and predictable. Worst of all there were hardly any highlights which surely would have been more interesting than listening to that studio audience and watching the housemates all sit on the sofas looking at a blank screen.
richie4eva
02-02-2015
Complete waste of 2 hours, when they could have just condensed it into 1

All that hulabaloo just to send Willis in there, that was hardly a 'bombshell'
atko
02-02-2015
Originally Posted by MrBing:
“Two hours of utter ****. Awkward mixture of BOTS, frustrating lack of highlights and a weak twist which failed to replicate the impact it had last year.

Plus the scheduling was awful, I'm expecting the worst ratings of the series.”

Just goes to show how Producers are running out of ideas now for BB.
Selena
02-02-2015
Awful idea in the first place.
sootysoo
02-02-2015
That audience were just awful weren't they? Fake, vicious queens labelled as journalists. Sounded more like a gang of queens on a night out in Brighton.
Taintedmeat
02-02-2015
I'm watching now on catch up but might just call it a night I'm so bored , bb always gets like this towards the end. Zz
Alrightmate
03-02-2015
That two hours dragged.
You could tell that much of it was just filler.
Pete_Lashmar
03-02-2015
Biggest mistake was that 10,000bc should have been at 8pm and then BB at 9 & they should have played the nominations right at the start and then open the voting, then gone to the HL with the usual post watershed style.

The twist was pretty poor I thought, they seem to big these things up and then it crashes around them.

The audience were complete plebs, the panel were bland and the discussions were drowned out completely.

Rubbish show.
boy_number_8
03-02-2015
I didnt see the point in it, it was just BOTS.

I'm more annoyed they didnt use the mirror face again like they did in the very first episode. They should at least got there moneys worth with that,
Alrightmate
03-02-2015
Originally Posted by Pete_Lashmar:
“Biggest mistake was that 10,000bc should have been at 8pm and then BB at 9 & they should have played the nominations right at the start and then open the voting, then gone to the HL with the usual post watershed style.

The twist was pretty poor I thought, they seem to big these things up and then it crashes around them.

The audience were complete plebs, the panel were bland and the discussions were drowned out completely.

Rubbish show.”

You're right. That scheduling was stupidity beyond belief.
This 10,000 BC, a show they've been hyping up, they put on after CBB so late it's hardly going to get seen.
The opening show, which they need to get a lot of viewers to watch. So when people don't tune in for future episodes because they missed the first one Channel 5 only have themselves to blame.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map