Originally Posted by bbcrzy:
“He did not make a statement about HIV the disease , he made a statement about Avoidance and Ostracizing and used it as an example. A very GOOD example as well. Unless you are over the age of 50 you likely have NO real idea of what it was like back then.
The suspicious and ostracizing of 'the gays' was blatant and harsh.
Kids and young adults who are making fun of perez for using this as an example .
name ONE other time in recent history that brutal and cruel ostracizing occurred to an individual that was 'different'. I cannot, nothing in my years of work comes close, not even herpes outbreaks (also incurable) in the 70s.
the comment was not about the disease and Michelle's response was ridiculous especially in line with her being one of the worst offenders.”
Well said. Perfect example of taking words out of context. And disgusting of Michelle to deliberately take it out of context in a sickening attempt to raise her own profile.
Her biggest hatred of Perez seems to be because he's 'gay' but doesn't conform to being a 'nice, lovable gay'. It's all about how Perez is a 'disgrace' to the 'gay' community. eer, if he were heterosexual would somebody be announcing in the diary room that' he was a disgrace to the heterosexual community'? I think not! They wouldn't even
think of making such a sweeping statement. The woman's an idiot. People can be obnoxious no matter which way they lean.
Perez's behaviour shouldn't be incorporated into the context of whether he is gay or not. It's obvious he has behavioural problems which are
inherent and nothing to do with whether he's gay or not. Michelle however likes to project tolerance of ALL gays through a holier than though persona, but her treatment of Perez shows a bigotry that doesn't quite gell with what comes out of her mouth. This is because her
main hatred of Perez doesn't seem to be completely based on is behavioural problems, they stem from him having these behavioural problems
and being 'gay' .