Jeremy Kyle's Graham on BBOTS

2 of 2

juliadesigns

04-02-2015

Originally Posted by KT_Dog:
“It's kind of a moot point the psychologist saying if people vote Perez to win they're validating his behaviour. People voting Perez to win presumably quite like his behaviour. Y”

I expect he means that it is fine to keep him in as 'entertainment' but voting him as winner isn't what we normally do with BB - although there have been several recent exceptions to the nice guy/girl wins out in the end scenario

open heart

04-02-2015

Originally Posted by KazzyD:
“He's rubbish, he loves Michelle !!!”

Yes!!!
I was gobsmacked at how he described Michelle.
He clearly couldn't have watched much of the show, either that or he's not a vey good psychologist!

Wow how wrong can you be about someone.

Michelle is a manipulative selfish game player.

And Calum has anger management issues.

Come on BB get some more insightful guests on PLEEEEASE!!!

HoHoHoHo

04-02-2015

Graham is a mug, he was giving his personal opinion and not professional opinion, p off back to your chavs.

SegaGamer

04-02-2015

Originally Posted by open heart:
“Yes!!!
I was gobsmacked at how he described Michelle.
He clearly couldn't have watched much of the show, either that or he's not a vey good psychologist!

Wow how wrong can you be about someone.

Michelle is a manipulative selfish game player.

And Calum has anger management issues.

Come on BB get some more insightful guests on PLEEEEASE!!!”

Psych-anythings are all frauds in my opinion. Throughout the history of this show i have always thought that.

Amelia_Sutherla

04-02-2015

Originally Posted by jobielad:
“Saying Perez plays the victim. He needs constant adrenaline shot - he gets it from KH. KH and Perez are not polar opposites, they thrive on the same thing, they both carry gossip. If on JK stage he would say never darken each others doors again. He says Callum has great coping skills, he is a good honest bloke. He walks away because he really does like to contain his emotions. Says Callum won't crack. Callum walks away to avoid the conflict but Perez wants to cause conflict. Of Katie Price he says she made real disclosures about herself and she is now wondering if she is being judged and she now thinks its better to be quiet. His advice would be to tell her to be herself. Of Keith he says he gets good support from the other housemates and he isn't struggling. He says no way can anyone be happy every day. He loves Michelle because she is the voice of reason. She is such a strong lady and he says she is balance in herself and only Perez will take her on. Kav needs to assert himself more - he doesn't cope well with the volume in the house but on one to one he is supportive. Graham wants Michelle to win as he says she has such good values and principles. Graham says if Perez wins he will be more off the scale and if the public vote him to win they are saying they validate his behaviour and we can't be saying that. He says Perez need for constant attention is worrying. He says both Perez and KH are manipulative.

Hope you find that interesting”

He lost me when he said Michelle was a strong clever woman,is this the same woman who became Hopkins bitch.

MargMck

04-02-2015

He's from one bottom of the tank telly show talking about paid Zelebs in a semi-scripted 'reality' series. Neither he nor us is seeing the whole truth, it's just edited highlights of created scenarios.

open heart

04-02-2015

Originally Posted by jobielad:
“He didn't say that. He said they are very similar and they are both manipulative. He wasn't asked what would happen if KH won ”

Interesting that he WASN'T asked this as well - just for balance.

BBBOTS is such a rubbish show.

Can't wait for Friday - after which I will no longer watch any future BBs.

HoHoHoHo

04-02-2015

Bots is soooo bias, Perez is annoying but Hopkins and her crew have been down right nasty, hopkins is the biggest trouble maker & game player of all and that re*ard Michelle is not nice person at all, genuine my ass.

MargMck

04-02-2015

All their 'experts' can only give opinions based on some TV clips, probably an hour or two of research the afternoon before the show. It's not like they get to meet the person, form a profile and then make a diagnosis. It remains picking up a pay cheque for mere opinion.
I've always thought being an 'expert' is a great job. Even professional experts can state their credentials and then give widely differing opinions. You get it in criminal trials, for instance like Oscar Pistorius, where one gets up and says ABC, and the next one XYZ.

jobielad

04-02-2015

Originally Posted by MargMck:
“All their 'experts' can only give opinions based on some TV clips, probably an hour or two of research the afternoon before the show. It's not like they get to meet the person, form a profile and then make a diagnosis. It remains picking up a pay cheque for mere opinion.
I've always thought being an 'expert' is a great job. Even professional experts can state their credentials and then give widely differing opinions. You get it in criminal trials, for instance like Oscar Pistorius, where one gets up and says ABC, and the next one XYZ.”

That's true. In the early days and I think a couple of the more recent qualified psychologists actually met and assessed the housemates so could form profiles. Mind you I think a good example was Prof Geoff Beatty who was a really interesting psychologist. He left about series 10 of BB however. He actually said one particular housemate was a Sociopath and I nearly fell out of my seat that night !

2 of 2