Are we now to assume that in order to win BB you have to be the leader of one particular "team"? Given that the last two lots of 'final two's" have been Helen/Ashleigh, Gary/James, and now chances are, Perez/Katie.

I find it a bit depressing that to win now you have to be brash and moany (maybe with the acceptance of Gary.) Do you think we will have a stand alone winner again that seems nice and doesn't appear to have a sort of mental disorder?

Don't forget Jim Davidson and Dappy.

I think I've given up hope.

Oh God yeah. And somehow it managed to get worse.

Oh dear.

Gary and James weren't final 2! It was Gary and Audley! James was 3rd! :P

But, I'm so happy the "nice" winners no longer seem to be a thing. It was ridiculous! We had people like Gina and Dexter providing brilliant, entertaining storylines and we got Sam as a winner. I mean....what?

i'd suggest that it is more to do with the editing by channel five than the actual characters. the best storylines are either "love stories" (which are often edited very clumsily and neither parties come off particularly well) or battle storylines, which is why the final two housemates seem to be the leaders of both parties as it rounds off the storyline with a definite end.

Ohhh bugger. I knew I got it wrong! Thanks haha. I found that whole series beyond depressing so I think by the time the final came about I was just pleased it was over.

Agree completely!!

I like it when the 'underdog' wins. I liked it last year when Jim Davidson won because i know it annoyed sooooo many people in the ''ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY'' and those of the high and mighty PC Brigade.

It also make for interesting fallout after the show i.e News, Papers and TV Shows.

So here's hoping Katie Hopkin's Wins!

I actually wanted Jim Davidson to win but that was mainly because for the most part I found him really funny, and he wasn't cruel or mean spirited. Just grumpy. But with Helen winning and now all the love for Perez and Katie H, it seems like being a bit miserable isn't good enough anymore and you have to actually be deliberately argumentative as to 'earn your fee'.

who were the nice winners?