• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Big Brother to release statement...
<<
<
7 of 8
>>
>
fredster
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by earwicker:
“Exactly! I can't believe that viewers here have been taken in by Perez's allegation that C5 wouldn't let him leave, and told him it was the Perez show. If any of you have followed the show you'll have noticed that he told lie after lie, changed his story by the minute, acted out so many roles that (he hoped) the HMs and viewers would never know when he was telling the truth or not. His post-eviction claim is not at all borne out by anything we've seen in the house at any time. Possibly he's delusional and doesn't even know what really happened. At best he is an unreliable witness.”

I have to agree with you he lied a lot. Especially when he came out of that room and said what he had heard,which was not always the truth.
primer
05-02-2015
if what perez says were true, BB would have at least 5 other HMs suing them for permitting him to stay, amounting to cruel and unusual punishment of the rest of them...
MargMck
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by john176bramley:
“At no point did Perez allege the producers wouldn't let him leave, which is interesting because it's the only thing they've denied. Everything that Perez claimed remains unchallenged for very good reason, because it is obviously the truth.”

Absolutely, John.
In fact that 'statement' is a classic example of their 'smoke and mirrors' approach.
1. Announce a statement will be issued. ✓
2. Issue a statement that doesn't deal with the issue. ✓
3. Know that enough viewers, because of inability to spot, or HM bias, will decide "Well that's that answered then. ✓
greenyone
05-02-2015
I can't beleive there's so many gullible on here of course it's all set up
yogacats
05-02-2015
WHAT'S HAPPENED- Have I missed sommat????
postit
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by nattoyaki:
“Perez not only makes the series The Perez Show but destroys the hapless producers at the same time.

Priceless!!!”

The producers couldn't organise a prayer meeting in a monastary.
Reality Sucks
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by Rufus Knights:
“Let's not compare Perez to someone who has actually won the show as chosen by the public.

This is a man who threatened Ken, he described Ken as a cancer, he harassed Alexander to the point he wouldn't even let him sleep, he stripped down to his pants and pretended to have sex with various objects in the garden, he threatened to shove his d*** up Calum's arse, he asked Hopkins to perform a sex act on him, he described being ostracized in the house to AIDS sufferers in African in the 90's.”

Ken was making all the women feel uncomfortable, so the description was apt. Regarding the coughing in the bedroom, he did that because he couldn't sleep and had gone into the bathroom and asked BB if he could come to the diary room. They can't leave the bedroom during the night like they used to. They just ignored him. he told them he would start coughing in the bedroom if they wouldn't let him come to the diary room. They ignored him. It wasn't directed at Alexander.This is the problem with no live feed.

Him saying he was going to shove his dick up Callum's arse is no diferent to Katie Hopkins telling him she was going to shove the rule book up his arse. Neither "threats" were serious.



The reason people don't like him (IMO) is because he's loud and has a more intense, manic energy than a "normal" person. This makes people feel on edge. So I can understand the people in the house being exhausted merely by being in his presence, the viewers, not so much.

he didn't do anything really bad in the house unless you think someone simulating sex with a window is in the really bad category.
What a shambles
05-02-2015
All part of the script. No different to CNN.
xynaria
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by Reality Sucks:
“
he didn't do anything really bad in the house unless you think someone simulating sex with a window is in the really bad category.”

But did the window consent ??... no one has had the good grace to query this........................... and he came 3 times..that's rather frightening...............
nitpikkin2
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“Rylan (like all presenters) wears an earpiece. If the production team had wanted him to stop they would have made that perfectly clear. So either he wilfully ignored the instructions he was getting from the gallery or they were quite happy for him to continue with his controversial line of question.”

Yes, I did get the feeling that he was being fed questions right up until the moment when he said "why don't you leave now?" or words to that effect. At that point it seemed the studio and Rylan weren't sure how to proceed. But as you say, they would've been able to ask him to change direction at any time. I look forward to the statement in the meantime.
john176bramley
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by nitpikkin2:
“Yes, I did get the feeling that he was being fed questions right up until the moment when he said "why don't you leave now?" or words to that effect. At that point it seemed the studio and Rylan weren't sure how to proceed. But as you say, they would've been able to ask him to change direction at any time. I look forward to the statement in the meantime.”

The statement has already been released it's further back in this thread.
Reeta_Taker
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by Lucypher:
“How on earth would Nadia know what's intelligent? She's a nobody. Can't even act.

Also, I've noticed when her hair's wet, she's got a bald patch and it's totally white/grey - those roots are shocking! ”

Yeah them grey roots are bound to affect her intelligence
CakeLike
05-02-2015
what can they say
EnricoIV
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by pie-eyed:
“There was nothing wrong with his treatment on bots. He behaved appallingly in the house and should be held accountable.”

Accountable? To whom?

The public voted him out. That's the only accounting that need be made.

Sad to see that even after he's gone, they have to keep on with their fabricated story line of Perez evil/Katie Hopkins good.
JVB69
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by sutie:
“Their mistake was in not standing up to the pathetic way he treated the DR staff. If he has it thrown in his face when he comes out of the house, it's only what he deserves.

You can't expect to treat people the way he does without repercussions.”

I agree !!!! He has treated the staff badly, the housemates badly so why is everyone upset that he got a fraction of what he dished out
greenyone
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by Lucypher:
“How on earth would Nadia know what's intelligent? She's a nobody. Can't even act.

Also, I've noticed when her hair's wet, she's got a bald patch and it's totally white/grey - those roots are shocking! ”

Ooh bitchy katie Hopkins
Artie
05-02-2015
Don't know why BB bothered to issue that statement. It says absolutely nothing of any interest or value. Perhaps they just think we're daft enough to believe it means they didn't persuade Perez to stay. In any case, what if they did? Does anyone actually care?
TeganRhan
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by Artie:
“Don't know why BB bothered to issue that statement. It says absolutely nothing of any interest or value. Perhaps they just think we're daft enough to believe it means they didn't persuade Perez to stay. In any case, what if they did? Does anyone actually care?”

I think the reason people care is because of how he's been treated on BOTS and that. The shows hosts saying "well why didn't you just leave" . They know why, and now we do too.
o0Autumn0o
05-02-2015
It was in blind gossips over the last 2 weeks about how fake the show is, and that people would out it.
Artie
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by TeganRhan:
“I think the reason people care is because of how he's been treated on BOTS and that. The shows hosts saying "well why didn't you just leave" . They know why, and now we do too.”

Perez went through three weeks of CBB and as he said, he'd gone through too much to walk away from the money whether he needed it or not. Even if the producers talked to him about staying it was always his choice in the end. The statement from BB adds nothing to the situation. In fact it creates more questions.

Both the eviction interview and BBBOTs with Perez were disastrous. Neither Emma nor Rylan could handle it and the panel were in the main, terrible.
pattiflat
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by pie-eyed:
“There was nothing wrong with his treatment on bots. He behaved appallingly in the house and should be held accountable.”

Agreed. Same goes for katie hopkins.
carnoch04
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by TeganRhan:
“I think the reason people care is because of how he's been treated on BOTS and that. The shows hosts saying "well why didn't you just leave" . They know why, and now we do too.”

They didn't handcuff him to the bed! He stayed because they stoked his ego, that's all.
muggins14
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“I'm sorry if this has been covered elsewhere but what exactly did Perez allege? I didn't manage to see BOTS last night.

Thanks.”

Just that somebody from production, which - of course - all the staff at BB are , persuaded him to stay when he threatened to leave. He seems to think that makes him special when, really, it makes him just another housemate who asked to leave and was persuaded not to!

Originally Posted by bambii:
“That not saying anything really.. Perez said he decided to stay after They told him it was the perez show. C5 said it was his decision to stay... they are not denying the producer conversation though... Interesting...”

Why should they deny it - it's not the first time a housemate's been persuaded to stay!

Originally Posted by hazy-days:
“Indeed! They knew they couldn't lie about it so they've just avoided addressing it completely. How disappointing.”

What is there to address, they persuaded him to stay. As has been pointed out many times on this thread (with regard to Alex leaving), housemates are free to leave - or not - it's their choice. Had he really, truly wanted to leave, Perez would have left.

Originally Posted by missfox:
“Perez will not give a shit if he dose not get his money for spilling the beans, he is already minted,he will get more money outing the BB producers, (or should I say BB fixers)”

There are no beans to spill. What beans? Again, he's not the first to be persuaded to stay, it's not a unique situation - he's not revealing anything we didn't already know before!

Originally Posted by carnoch04:
“I am not really getting the fuss about this. We have seen HM's going into the DR and begging to leave countless times over the years. Big Brother has then persuaded them to stay. What's different here?”

Exactly. Not really understanding the uproar.
TeganRhan
05-02-2015
Artie I agree with you but they didn't have to act like "oh we're gonna get you with this..." When the production team were as we have said, in on talking him into staying.
They knew this, so they didn't have a leg to stand in with that point. IF the production. Team had said "go in then...**** off" and Perez had suddenly had a change of heart, I'd say ok.

Originally Posted by carnoch04:
“They didn't handcuff him to the bed! He stayed because they stoked his ego, that's all.”

Chill the hell out. I'm not yelling at you don't yell at me. I'm not a campaigner on this forum. I'm not team anyone. I think most should have noticed this by now due to my lack of posting here.
jobielad
05-02-2015
Originally Posted by Yera:
“Perez tweeted

@sinittaofficial @pelcid @RealDeniseWelch @KTHopkins The show should have let me go then, when I tried to leave. The truth will come out.”

Oh no can't believe he's a friend of Denise Welch???
<<
<
7 of 8
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map