Originally Posted by planets:
“Alexander was far from blameless, why do you think he went out ? why do think we weren't shown?”
“Alexander was far from blameless, why do you think he went out ? why do think we weren't shown?”
Why did Perez set out to have a go at him? Why not leave him alone?
Perez never left ANYONE alone, that's part of his problem and part of his psychological bullying. They have to get away from him and they can't.
And when they do because they can't bear him, they are seen as bullying him, and when they don't there's a confrontation with him and Perez blames THEM.
No one NO ONE apart from Nadia who looked knackered and couldn't wait to get away from him, liked Perez in that house.
Keith was JUBILANT, happy as a bird that he was gone.
Perez is the sort of person that people DON'T want around. There are reasons for this that aren't 'he's misunderstood', as Perez chose to act normally now and again and was just about tolerable. And then he chose to act like an arsehole again.
That's his choice, and he can't expect people to like him when he has no consideration or thought for anyone else AT LEAST, and is deliberately offensive at other times.
You underestimate him. And you give him too much credibility. He's a massive manipulator and thrives on conflict. His life and career are a testament to THAT, not to him being 'misunderstood'.
He's figured out that it 'didn't wash' and he's changed his shtick, he's not stupid, he's still playing the public.




Found the clip on You tube. As others have said, an excellent interview and Perez comes across as a decent, kind and quite humble person, actually quite shell shocked from it all. His non-fans are unlikely to ever be converted, but if you're prepared to watch the interview to the end, with an open mind, I think at the very least, you'll concede just how skewed our perceptions and opinions of someone can be, when you only see the negative stuff, with the extreme editing.
Like