|
||||||||
Vote to Evict or Vote to Save? |
| View Poll Results: Vote to Evict or Vote to Save. What do you prefer | |||
| Vote to Evict |
|
38 | 63.33% |
| Vote to Save |
|
22 | 36.67% |
| Voters: 60. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 667
|
Vote to Evict or Vote to Save?
Poll up soon
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
|
Vote to save
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,479
|
To evict, obviously. As in the old days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 623
|
Vote to save as all the big characters (love them or hate them) go out on vote to evict
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,978
|
Save..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: london-essex
Posts: 8,811
|
evict...
to save is a mind trick for the soft |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,894
|
It should always be vote to evict imo. Voting to save means the more lesser known or less popular housemates are always at risk of leaving.
I suppose thats why they do it though, to get rid of the deadwood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,296
|
Evict get rid of the nasties that I don't finf entertaining in the slightest
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lincs
Posts: 16,173
|
It is vote to save that leaves us with the very real prospect of poisonous Hopkins winning tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,364
|
Vote to Save.
Look at it like this, we vote for the Winner in the final week, so we should be voting the same, positive, fashion every week. If this series were vote to evict we'd have lost Perez and Katie Hopkins (no matter what you think of them, they've pulled in ratings) early on, and be left with Kavana. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 14,007
|
Since I don't vote, it matters little to me.
Sorry OP...........and I didn't vote in your poll either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,530
|
VTE. It punishes nastiness, where VTS rewards it.
As for the "VTS keeps the entertaining characters" argument, that doesn't always happen. Plus, having the louder ones go gives us a chance to see more from the others who could very well be entertaining given the chance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 17,638
|
Regardless of pros and cons for us, it has to stay vote to save as that option is much harder for betting scam rings to manipulate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,057
|
Vote to save always.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,568
|
Quote:
Regardless of pros and cons for us, it has to stay vote to save as that option is much harder for betting scam rings to manipulate.
CBB would not have lasted this long on channel 5 if it had been VTE. people forget the show actually needs to sustain viewers to survive !! whats the point in all the controversy being sucked out of the house within a couple of weeks which means less headlines, dull shows, less viewers. no show. thank god C5 had the common sense to change it when they took over from 4. however i just wish they would use save for the civilian show aswell. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,712
|
VTS is the best thing to happen to the show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ...Age...Sex.
Posts: 3,454
|
Vote to evict, the way it was intended.
You should be able to get rid of people who are unpopular instead of them being rewarded with winning. A lot of people who have won over the last few years, wouldn't have lasted 5 Mins in a house with the original format. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 🖥⌨🖱
Posts: 29,243
|
Both as bad as each other.
Voters should be given the option to either save (+vote) or evict (-vote) with the HM receiving the lowest net total going. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 482
|
I wonder how many people who loved Perez are voting for vote to evict. He would have gone straight away if that was the case.
What to save works best. It gets rid of the housemates that are not doing anything worth watching, who wouldnt leave if it was a vote to evict as no one has opinions of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,568
|
Quote:
Vote to evict, the way it was intended.
You should be able to get rid of people who are unpopular instead of them being rewarded with winning. A lot of people who have won over the last few years, wouldn't have lasted 5 Mins in a house with the original format. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ...Age...Sex.
Posts: 3,454
|
Quote:
BBUK is one of the tiny amount of versions which use VTE. its vote to save pretty much everywhere else.
Big Brother UK started out with vote to evict. The Housemates choose who they want to evict. We should be able to choose who to evict. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Posts: 4,680
|
Overall I would say vote to save. As much as I dislike him we would have lost perez too early on. Kudos to the poster from day 1 who predicted he would be evicted just before the final though! Can't remember who it was
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21.


