LOL It wouldn't surprise me!
So are the Jordan supporters the same people who want page 3 banned?
That wouldn't make any sense.
I want Katie Price to win and I never cared whether page 3 existed or not.
I was completely indifferent to it and I'm a feminist.
I want Katie Price to win and I never cared whether page 3 existed or not.
I was completely indifferent to it and I'm a feminist.
I couldn't give a flying fook about page 3.
If women want bare their breasts, that's their prerogative.
Besides, I don't read The Sh*te, so.......
Anyhoo, I want Pricey to win, 'cause she's the best of a bad bunch tbh.
It's like when I wanted anyone but Gina or Dexter to win.
Doesn't matter who wins, just as long as it's not.............................
If women want bare their breasts, that's their prerogative.
Besides, I don't read The Sh*te, so.......
Anyhoo, I want Pricey to win, 'cause she's the best of a bad bunch tbh.
It's like when I wanted anyone but Gina or Dexter to win.
Doesn't matter who wins, just as long as it's not.............................
I support Katie P, and am a feminist, and am not a fan of Page 3.
Here's the thing - as far as I am aware, no-one who wants rid of Page 3 hates or condemns the models who pose for it. What they (and I) hate is the idea that having topless women in a national newspaper is an entirely normal thing, because of the way that might make certain members of the public percieve women (thst they're just a pair of breasts; a sexual figure there for lusting after and nothing more). Not to mention the way it might make young women percieve themselves and their worth.
I would NEVER condemn a woman for taking her clothes off. It's her choice. The problem occurs when other members of society believe that BECAUSE a woman takes her clothes off for a living, she deserves to be treated as a second class citizen, and deserves to be called a 'slag' etc. In fact I'm getting flashbacks to the Jeremy incident now!
I think you may have misunderstood it a bit, OP. There's a place for titilation, glamour photography and pornography, and a national newspaper isn't it.
Here's the thing - as far as I am aware, no-one who wants rid of Page 3 hates or condemns the models who pose for it. What they (and I) hate is the idea that having topless women in a national newspaper is an entirely normal thing, because of the way that might make certain members of the public percieve women (thst they're just a pair of breasts; a sexual figure there for lusting after and nothing more). Not to mention the way it might make young women percieve themselves and their worth.
I would NEVER condemn a woman for taking her clothes off. It's her choice. The problem occurs when other members of society believe that BECAUSE a woman takes her clothes off for a living, she deserves to be treated as a second class citizen, and deserves to be called a 'slag' etc. In fact I'm getting flashbacks to the Jeremy incident now!
I think you may have misunderstood it a bit, OP. There's a place for titilation, glamour photography and pornography, and a national newspaper isn't it.
