I have to admit, I think Calum would have taken it without KP still in, ppl that voted her that wouldn't vote KH would have probably gone for Calum.

She did nothing. Callum or cheggers or Michelle were more worthy

Why does a person have to be a Hopkins fan just because they didn't like Pricey winning ?
I'm a fan of neither and I think the result was a total farce. KP did sod all in the house except tell us about Alex Reids' liking to have things shoved up his backside. Something I personally could have done without knowing.

She did nothing. At best she was bland, at worst a complete non entity. The most crashingly dull winner of CBB ever in my opinion.

I thought it couldnt get any worse than when Ulrika Johnson won the CBB after doing nothing bar moan she wanted to go home. Now this plastic bore who went in late and did absolutely nothing but be crass about her sex life and talk about herself WINS! I wonder if its fixed

I think so, too !

KP said, this week, that Keith would get the, ' Old Lady' vote. There, obviously, wasn't enough of them around, last night

KP is very much in the public eye, with a multitude of young devotees. I always thought that she might win he. Also, she would have picked up Calum's votes & those who were anti KH.

Also Rachel Rice springs to mind!

Rachel was in fact nice. Nice and decent and sadly too bland. Cannot ever be compared to Price. More on the same scale as Cheggers .

Rightly or wrongly won it entirely on her own merit in the house. KP has a huge chav following. Probably much more than anyone else in there. It was a foregone conclusion she would win with the fan base she has. She didn't have to do anything but sit there and talk trash. And that's what she did.

I was going to say pretty much the same thing, but you got there before me
Yes, Rachel was bland. But she was a nice person and she did win on her own merits.

There seems to be a bit of a misconception with some on here, that by default KP is nice because others in there weren't. Personally I don't think she had enough of a personality to make a distinction. She was dull, it's that simple.

LMAO it's the same every series. Threads galore telling us the wrong person won lol. Some people take this show far too seriously. Jesus just move on!

Yeah she was boring but the fact she beat that old hag was brilliant, Hopkins rant on BOTS was worth it alone. Bitter troll!

I don't often post on the BB section. So I'm not one of those types who complains every series. I contribute to a thread when I feel like voicing my opinion, far from taking it too seriously.

Not many people liked Katie H when she went in and she showed us exactly why she isn't liked!

Big mouthed bully who says stuff for a reaction!!

Sanity prevailed and the GBP stopped Hopkins from winning.
I'd rather any one of them won rather than Hopkins but I'm very pleased it wasn't one of her sheep either.
Result!!

Having just watched BBOTS this morning, it was interesting to see that Emma had put down Katie P as her winner on the opening night of the series and Katie P saying she was sat at home watching the programme thinking she was glad she wasn't in it this year and then three days later the phone rang asking her to go in!

This^^^

Yes

Pricey appeared to be nice as well. Both, Proceh and Rice shared the possessive the boring gene

She didn't deserve to win over any of the other final four.

If you were to compile the best bits of the house or think back in a years time about this particular show, how much KP would you really remember?

The bottomless pit that is her vagina. that is the only memory of her I will take from this

Correct



Are who was voting to keep KH in for as long as possible

I hated perez with a passion but he deserved to win more than KP.

The winning bit.

I agree with all of this. I liked keith and wouldn't have minded if he'd won, but I have to admit that he wasn't very entertaining. KH & Perez were not v ery likeable HMs but by golly they were entertaining! Their antics kept me interested in CBB like it never had before. I still didn't want either of them to win though as it would have seemed like their behaviour was acceptable.

I am now convinced that it is.

For those who pay to vote for their favourite HM and then discover it had been fixed for someone to win right from the start, they have every right to take a suspect win seriously, because their money has been taken fraudulently. Their favourite never had a chance of winning, and without what I think was a fix, KH would have won, coming 2nd meant that she had the public behind her, she simply did not have KP's enormous publicity machine & C5 behind her.

I didn't particularly want Hopkins to win, but she put a hell of a lot more into the show than KP did.

Says it all, doesn't it?

Yep that's what did it for me

Has to be cos I have no clue how CC won

Stopped watching BB when it went to C5 and became a meeting place for TOWIE type wannabes. And no idea who Charlotte Crosby is or Helen Wood, who's name I've seen mentioned on DS, So doubt I'll be watching the next one - the original format has gone forever.