• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
What an f'ing joke!!! Katie price was boring as hell!!
<<
<
3 of 6
>>
>
Tattybear270608
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by Fanntastik:
“nope. give me boring over vile any day.

they were all vile except pricey and keith.”

Are you not familiar with Big Brother? Clearly not.
Fanntastik
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by Tattybear270608:
“Are you not familiar with Big Brother? Clearly not.”

I've watched every series so i'm more familiar with it than you
benbeez1
06-02-2015
just relieved Calum didn't win
EvieJ
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by jacquelineanne:
“I strongly disagree. Katie Price is pure trash.”

How pleasant of you
dtorre
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by Fanntastik:
“nope. give me boring over vile any day.

they were all vile except pricey and keith.”

Pricey has been vile since before the millennium. She's vile and boring
jacquelineanne
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by EvieJ:
“How pleasant of you ”

Why thank you
atko
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by Fanntastik:
“Sour grapes in this thread, eh? Haha! ”

Nothing to do with sour grapes....if she had come in 5 minutes before the end of the final she would have won it, it was a farce! It was more like sour grapes that KH was going to win it so everybody piled on KP to ensure it didn't happen because their favs had gone! No true fan of BB can possibly think KP deserved to win that at all! It's a new low for BB....go in to the BB house & talk about your sex life for a week or so & come out as BB winner!! Total trash!
Tattybear270608
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by Mrs Checks:
“FAR nicer than Hopkins.”

My old grannys nice but she wouldnt provide any entertainment in the big brother house and therefore wouldnt deserve to win!

BIG BROTHER isnt about putting a bunch of nice people in a house and have friendly chit chat for a few weeks, singing along to the sound of music, playing with eachothers hair and taking about weddings! For godsake get a grip! Ive watched big brother from the start! Its about entertainment! Not boring people like Katie Price has shown!! Which by the way she is nothing like on her tv shows!
Tracker321
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by simey:
“She won because she's got 2m followers on twitter all voting for the woman. She was boring and did NOT deserve to win!”

Ah! but she did! Well done, Pricey.
daisydee
06-02-2015
And Emma is now feeding her all the right lines. <rolls eyes>
Mrs Checks
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by jacquelineanne:
“I strongly disagree. Katie Price is pure trash.”

I'll take someone who bitches about her exes over someone who bitches about entire groups of society and people she's never even met and should have nothing against, ANY DAY.
Mrs Checks
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by Tattybear270608:
“My old grannys nice but she wouldnt provide any entertainment in the big brother house and therefore wouldnt deserve to win!

BIG BROTHER isnt about putting a bunch of nice people in a house and have friendly chit chat for a few weeks, singing along to the sound of music, playing with eachothers hair and taking about weddings! For godsake get a grip! Ive watched big brother from the start! Its about entertainment! Not boring people like Katie Price has shown!! Which by the way she is nothing like on her tv shows!”

Some people, like myself, abhor the fact that some of the audience see being nasty as entertainment, and would rather the quieter but nicer housemates won.

I'm all for entertaining housemates, but I don't find bitching and sniping particularly entertaining. I'd honestly rather watch Price & Cheggars having a nice cup of tea.

It's all subjective, I'm afraid.
Tattybear270608
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by Mrs Checks:
“Some people, like myself, abhor the fact that some of the audience see being nasty as entertainment, and would rather the quieter but nicer housemates won.

I'm all for entertaining housemates, but I don't find bitching and sniping particularly entertaining. I'd honestly rather watch Price & Cheggars having a nice cup of tea.

It's all subjective, I'm afraid.”

I think you would find without big brother putting 'entertaining' housemates in that it would have ended years ago.
Mrs Checks
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by Tattybear270608:
“I think you would find without big brother putting 'entertaining' housemates in that it would have ended years ago.”

As I said, entertainment is subjective.
Eurostar
06-02-2015
It strikes me that people voted for "Katie Price, the showbiz personality" rather than "Katie Price, the Big Brother housemate"......it has to be that, as she did absolutely zero in the house.
coosla
06-02-2015
Well I don't know what this says about the people who voted for her, they obviously enjoy hearing stupid women talk about how their ex's liked sex, how they cheated on them and have any views on anything!!

If anything this result is very disturbing, she did nothing the whole time she was in there, which was 10 days less than the rest, the most draining days too it must be said, so really not even had as hard a time as everyone else. Let's befare she wasn't well enough to do this show but still put money and public adoration before her health, not something anyone should reward these days.

As for BB imo it's just another knock for this struggling reminant of a once great show. it will never be great again when the wallpaper hm's come through and win. Next year we can now expect more of the same, terrible for the show and nothing to be celebrated in this.

No matter what anyone says Katie Hopkins deserved to win this because she did the most, it's not about weather you like her or not, it should be about who did the most, and she certainly earned her money, and therefore should have won.
Katy Price winning is such a dampener at the end of such a good series such a shame, this series deserved a real worthy winner.
EvieJ
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by coosla:
“Well I don't know what this says about the people who voted for her, they obviously enjoy hearing stupid women talk about how their ex's liked sex, how they cheated on them and have any views on anything!!

If anything this result is very disturbing, she did nothing the whole time she was in there, which was 10 days less than the rest, the most draining days too it must be said, so really not even had as hard a time as everyone else. Let's befare she wasn't well enough to do this show but still put money and public adoration before her health, not something anyone should reward these days.

As for BB imo it's just another knock for this struggling reminant of a once great show. it will never be great again when the wallpaper hm's come through and win. Next year we can now expect more of the same, terrible for the show and nothing to be celebrated in this.

No matter what anyone says Katie Hopkins deserved to win this because she did the most, it's not about weather you like her or not, it should be about who did the most, and she certainly earned her money, and therefore should have won.
Katy Price winning is such a dampener at the end of such a good series such a shame, this series deserved a real worthy winner.”

Rubbish, its a popularity vote, not a bonus based on output.
ChoccyCarole
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by Tattybear270608:
“Was it ****!

She had zero personality in the show and provide zero entertainment. If thats what you want from reality tv then good effort!”

Well said - The final was even more of a damp squib especially when the total borefest aka Katie Price potty mouth - became the winner
what a flop all round
I couldn't see anything special about any of the last 5 housemates
If Calum trying to act like a humble gentleman had won - it would have be just as bad
Michelle was bleurk and Cheggars far too bland
Unfortunately If I had a choice I would have wanted Katie Hopkins to win out of those dismal 5
even though she was vile too many times/
Emma and Rylan are both a totally sickening cringefest too

The only two worth watching were Perez and Nadia
All my votes went to Perez and when he left I couldn't care less about any of them
Eurostar
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by coosla:
“Well I don't know what this says about the people who voted for her, they obviously enjoy hearing stupid women talk about how their ex's liked sex, how they cheated on them and have any views on anything!!

If anything this result is very disturbing, she did nothing the whole time she was in there, which was 10 days less than the rest, the most draining days too it must be said, so really not even had as hard a time as everyone else. Let's befare she wasn't well enough to do this show but still put money and public adoration before her health, not something anyone should reward these days.

As for BB imo it's just another knock for this struggling reminant of a once great show. it will never be great again when the wallpaper hm's come through and win. Next year we can now expect more of the same, terrible for the show and nothing to be celebrated in this.

No matter what anyone says Katie Hopkins deserved to win this because she did the most, it's not about weather you like her or not, it should be about who did the most, and she certainly earned her money, and therefore should have won.
Katy Price winning is such a dampener at the end of such a good series such a shame, this series deserved a real worthy winner.”

I had an idea we'd have a joke of a winner when I saw that Perez didn't make the final. Like him or loathe him, he was a huge character and dominated this series from start to finish (or almost finish) along with Katie H......it was an absolute shocker he didn't make the final.

God knows what criteria the voting public are using when they pick up the phone.
Eurostar
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by EvieJ:
“Rubbish, its a popularity vote, not a bonus based on output.”

Yes, but I think they voted for the showbiz version of Price, not the one who was actually in the house.
EnricoIV
06-02-2015
Last time I listened to the voting spiel, they didn't say anything about "vote for the most entertaining housemate." They say to vote for who you want to win. So they did.
EvieJ
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by Eurostar:
“Yes, but I think they voted for the showbiz version of Price, not the one who was actually in the house.”

I dont know the showbiz Katie, I get irritated when newspapers are full of her and avoid reading any articles. I liked her more in there than I expected to, that was in the context of the house and may not of been controversial but she wasn't nasty.

She was the better of the two and that probably won it for her.
Eurostar
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by EnricoIV:
“Last time I listened to the voting spiel, they didn't say anything about "vote for the most entertaining housemate." They say to vote for who you want to win. So they did.”

Absolutely, though it does tell us a little about the voting public themselves. The likes of Katie Price and Callum Best are rather empty and vacuous veterans of the British reality TV show circuit (in my humble opinion of course).
Eurostar
06-02-2015
Originally Posted by EvieJ:
“I dont know the showbiz Katie, I get irritated when newspapers are full of her and avoid reading any articles. I liked her more in there than I expected to, that was in the context of the house and may not of been controversial but she wasn't nasty.

She was the better of the two and that probably won it for her.”

The only problem I'd have with her stay is that she mostly talked about her cheating ex-partners....I'm not entirely sure what any of those have got to do with her fellow housemates or the viewing public (and I thought she made a show of Alex Reid by revealing all his sex secrets).
Bongo999
06-02-2015
Absolutely
<<
<
3 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map