As a viewer, I feel cheated that a celebrity who had not had the entire BB experience, who sat in the house either keeping out of trouble most of the time or just telling us what she had already written in her books or perhaps was dying to write but not got round to it managed to beat the other housemates to emerge as the Winner!

So please please tell me what is it about her that makes her a winner?

She not a hateful bully. This is important.

Everything is comparative - look at who else was there to choose from, so to answer your question YES she was a worthy winner

Don't think she did enough to merit winning.

Yes very much Yes considering who she was left with Yes a thousand more times.

Big brother and it's voters have shown us you can be a success by sitting back and doing fook all. So for that I for one am grateful

I don't think she's a worthy winner at all. Worst CBB win ever IMO.

KP displayed a stunning lack of personality. Vacuous and dull. There was nothing about her that merited a win. A total boring flop of an end to this year's CBB.

I can only assume her legions of fans had her number on speed dial. And of course there were the anti KH voters too. Voting for the monotonous Pwicey to make sure KH didn't win.

The Perez Show ran for 3.5 weeks, CBB for .5 weeks and the offerings left on the plate were Poisonous, Bland Gristle or Salty Slapper. So in that respect she was the obvious worthy winner.

I think she was a worthy winner, a calming influence on one of the most argumentative series. She didn't feel the need to argue for the sake of arguing, but she did stand up for herself. I'm glad someone nice won the show as if it was Katie H or Perez it would be as if the British public were saying it's ok to say the things they say and act the way they act..

I think she is. Once again she has blown public perception sky high. Everyone was expecting some Jordanesque behaviour or worse and she turned out to be normal and quite boring. A pleasant, unexpected surprise which kept people talking about her.
She has reinvented herself before our very eyes and reinstated the belief that nice, albeit dull, behaviour triumphs over offensiveness.
A worthy winner in my eyes.

There were no worthy winners in the final 5, I'd go as far as to say there were no worthy winners in the whole show. But in a house full of bitches and attention seekers a decent person is going to stand out like a beacon.

That's the thing though. I don't even think she came across as nice. There wasn't enough to her personality to make that kind of judgment call I think. She was just a non entity. She doesn't automatically become nice by default just because she was in there with people who weren't nice.

I was stunned that she won, but pleased that Katie H didn't win. Katie P didn't win, in my opinion, for any other reason than gaining the anti-Hopkins vote. She didn't win on her own merit.

Obviously, only my personal opinion.

No not worthy but she won for various reasons already mentioned. It's understandable to feel cheated. But hey ho.

I think Keith should have won, and I am disappointed that he got fewer votes to win than that vile Katie Hopkins.

But, of the two Katies, i am really, really glad that Katie Price won.

it is bad enough that the GBP were taken in by Hopkins enough to put her in the final. It would have been too much if she had won.

But why didn't Callum pick up the anti-Hopkins win. He was a favourite with the bookies, good looking and had been there since the beginning.

Same can be said about Michelle, Calum. Kav and Keith
As for Katie Hopkins I don't agree with anything she stands for It was bad enough that woman winning last summer.

Maybe that's the best to come out of this very nasty series its not what you do in the house its how you come across and who you are. conflict is always going to occur but when producers saw things dying down they flooded the house with outside information knowing the result.

Neither was Calum Best, but he was there from the word go and surely worthy of winning the title on his birthday?

This exactly.

All I ever saw of her was a bland staring face and when she did speak it was in the style of Jay from the Inbetweeners all about her sex life! Not particularly interesting and hardly appropriate behaviour from a 36 year old mother!!

Indeed Calum and Keith both ticked the box for an anti- Hopkins vote.

Im not bothered by the fact she came in late, as sometimes it can be extra difficult for them to be accepted and part of the group.

Im thoroughly disappointed she was in the final, as she did nothing, other than sharing her sexual antiques with us (crunge). She brought absolutely nothing to the show. I didnt even watch her interview.

As far as im concerned Hopkins was my winner. Yaaaaay

I think she is the worst winner of all time even worse than Charlotte Crosby! (and that's saying something)

He did not have the Katie P. fanclub backing him. Nothing wrong with Katie P. however, I do not feel she deserved to win. My only memories are the things she said about the numerous men in her past/life.

As she said herself, if people ask her about her sex life she will tell them straight up.
Perhaps if they had asked about other things we would have heard about them instead.

Calum, Katie H and Michele were my dream team for the top 3 positions.