Can anyone explain this for me? As I don't understand what it means but I am sure it is very simple.. and I am being very thick


DS readers had voted for Katie Hopkins to win, taking 24.42% of 24,200 votes cast. Price had the lowest outcome of all the finalists, with 15.53%.

Hope the links works..

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s150/...p3CdypvJCgHSdD

Was there really only 24,200 votes cast?!

Bump..

Anyone?

On this forum yes.

its just a poll on digital spy and she wasnt VOTED least favourite, she was just the one with the least votes in their favourite poll..............BIG difference and thats why she won, katie hopkins has more people who hate her than like her so she was always going to lose to the other finalist, even if they were bland like katie price

Ah thank you. I read that paragraph completely wrong. And thought it was the overall show voting %'s which confused me.

Must have been the wine last night - feeling a bit like Kav probably does today

My bad.

That makes no sense though as people were voting to win weren't they?

Therefore you could be the most hated and it wouldn't change anything, providing you're the most liked at the same time. Otherwise there are people so consumed by hate that they are voting for all of the other finalists unless i'm missing something?

When it's down to the final 2 it becomes like a vote to evict. Anyone who didn't like Hopkins could pile votes onto whoever she was up against.

they said that kp was voted least favourite but the vote wasnt 'least favourite', if they asked that like this ds poll (http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showt...ight=least+win), the result is katie hopkins. kp was just the favourite with the least amount of people but she could have been 2nd favourite with everyone, therefore more liked overall but the person voted least favourite (ie hated the most) was katie hopkins

Ah of course, i had completely forgotten the phone lines stay open. I was thinking they close the second the final started but as you say when it gets to two you can hurt the HMs you don't like a lot easier.

Katie price was obviously winning during the whole final as I'm pretty sure they would have announced it and made a big deal about the vote changing. Don't buy all the anti-Hopkins theories. The same was said last year about how everyone would vote for whoever was up against Helen in the final 2. It didn't make a difference

you can never go by the polls as being accurate as a lot of people who vote on polls dont actually register votes through phone ect

Emma did announce it was a close vote but that might have been between Calum and Hopkins for the runner-up spot.

If Christopher had been in the final 2 last year he may have picked up some tactical votes but Helen vs Ashleigh were the main protagonists head-to-head. The "nice" option had gone.

Another poll on the Digital Spy BB forum recordrf that most people who voted in it don't vote on Big Brother.

I think KP was ahead all along. I doubt the anti Hopkins vote made any difference , if there even was such a thing.