• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
NO jeremy on CBB last night
d_ream1
07-02-2015
They could at least ask him back for the final show. Mould give chloe a chance to apologise aswell.
danyell
07-02-2015
And Ken wasn't there. It's like their erasing them from our memories. I will never forget them big brother. Never!!!
Devon
07-02-2015
Hardly surprising though considering the circumstances he left in.

I don't blame him for giving it a miss.

He has probably returned to the U.S. by now anyway. The guy obviously had issues that he needed to deal with so hanging on for the CBB final was hopefully last thing on his list.
calamity
07-02-2015
Can someone tell me the difference from Ken joking and talking about the young girls bodies when last night we were showed a film with all the women eyeing up and saying things about Calums body.... strange that ...
Inspiration1289
07-02-2015
It still disappoints me so much that Ken left- yes he was an idiot saying a word he got warned for too many times but he was awesome.

I liked Jeremy too, what he did was outrageous but he would have been an interesting housemate- plus he was kinda hot compared to that wet lettuce calum.
danyell
07-02-2015
Originally Posted by calamity:
“Can someone tell me the difference from Ken joking and talking about the young girls bodies when last night we were showed a film with all the women eyeing up and saying things about Calums body.... strange that ...”

Double standards! Poor Ken. Although that's not why he got kicked out.
striing
07-02-2015
Was Alexander there?
Devon
07-02-2015
Originally Posted by striing:
“Was Alexander there?”

Yes Alex was there and was on BBBOTS later on too!
molliepops
07-02-2015
It was bit of a shame they weren't there, they were part of the show, but perhaps they didn't want to be there, Ken has said things about the show he may not want to face them about.
Salv*
08-02-2015
I said the same, I know they were kicked out and usually ejected HMs don't appear, but they didn't mention them at all apart from the series HLs. In theory, they should have been mentioned more as their ejections were the reason the series was so successful. The ratings started climbing after Jeremy's ejection, so would have thought they would have mentioned them personally.

Is Jez in the US now? I want to hear what he is up to. That's why I follow his Twitter.
MC_Satan
08-02-2015
Was he not charged with something?
Penny Crayon
08-02-2015
When HM's are kicked out (in disgrace) they're never invited back.
phill363
08-02-2015
Hang on why should Chloe have apologized? did he not rip her dressing gown exposing her top?
borintimebrenda
08-02-2015
Originally Posted by molliepops:
“It was bit of a shame they weren't there, they were part of the show, but perhaps they didn't want to be there, Ken has said things about the show he may not want to face them about.”

What things has Ken said about the show?
adwalton
08-02-2015
Originally Posted by molliepops:
“It was bit of a shame they weren't there, they were part of the show, but perhaps they didn't want to be there, Ken has said things about the show he may not want to face them about.”

If people are removed from the house they are never brought on at the end. Besides, as they were removed tather than being voted out, presumably they have broken their contracts and would not be paid. So they are not likely to appear for nothing at the end.
Fanntastik
08-02-2015
Why should Chloe apologize? She has no reason to.
johnny_dole
08-02-2015
Originally Posted by calamity:
“Can someone tell me the difference from Ken joking and talking about the young girls bodies when last night we were showed a film with all the women eyeing up and saying things about Calums body.... strange that ...”

mate the double standards here are rife.

let me tell you , am pretty much done with this forum haha

am now gonna lurk from now on mostly and read the unintentionally funny posts/threads some people make
InMyArms
08-02-2015
Hardly surprising he wasn't asked back since Chloe was there.
d_ream1
08-02-2015
Originally Posted by Fanntastik:
“Why should Chloe apologize? She has no reason to.”


For overreacting and being disingenuous. She has since made allegations against other unknown men whilst being photographed for page 3 but refusing to name names. Imagine how anyone working in that industry now feels.

She only did that to try and justify her initial behaviour I.e. Becoming hysterical.
d_ream1
08-02-2015
Originally Posted by MC_Satan:
“Was he not charged with something?”

No, which was why he didn't need to go to court.
MC_Satan
08-02-2015
Originally Posted by d_ream1:
“No, which was why he didn't need to go to court.”

Ah, thanks. Wasn't sure.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map