DS Forums

 
 

Not in front of the telly: Warning over 'listening' TV


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-02-2015, 16:39
noise747
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,810

Oh dear, another reason to keep clear of smart TV sets.
noise747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 09-02-2015, 16:50
chrisjr
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading
Posts: 27,918
Only a problem if...

Your TV uses voice control

and

It sends what you have spoken across t'interweb to be decoded into commands it recognises rather than doing the speech recognition entirely internally.

And the service doing the speech recognition records everything and stores it and includes searching for keywords other than those used to control the telly.
chrisjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 18:06
jenzie
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Posts: 20,385
and it's bullcrap
usual paranoid nonsense
jenzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 19:33
neo_wales
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Wales/Gran Canaria
Posts: 8,299
Oh dear, another reason to keep clear of smart TV sets.
What on earth are you talking about now...
neo_wales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 19:49
-GONZO-
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent
Posts: 8,954
Oh dear, another reason to keep clear of smart TV sets.
You best stay away from Robot Vacuum cleaners too as they're now known to attack you while your asleep http://news.sky.com/story/1424239/ro...ng-womans-hair
-GONZO- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 20:33
noise747
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,810
Only a problem if...

Your TV uses voice control

and

It sends what you have spoken across t'interweb to be decoded into commands it recognises rather than doing the speech recognition entirely internally.

And the service doing the speech recognition records everything and stores it and includes searching for keywords other than those used to control the telly.
Why on earth would anyone want voice recognition on a Tv for anyway?
noise747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 20:34
noise747
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,810
and it's bullcrap
usual paranoid nonsense
Well Samsung to not denie it in fact
Samsung said: "If a consumer consents and uses the voice recognition feature, voice data is provided to a third party during a requested voice command search. At that time, the voice data is sent to a server, which searches for the requested content then returns the desired content to the TV.
noise747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 20:35
noise747
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,810
What on earth are you talking about now...
well you don't know because you did not read the the article via the link, but you do that a lot
noise747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 20:37
noise747
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,810
You best stay away from Robot Vacuum cleaners too as they're now known to attack you while your asleep http://news.sky.com/story/1424239/ro...ng-womans-hair
i seen that poor woman.

I would not mind one of them, I stayed over night at a friends place last year in their living room and was woken up early hours of the morning by one of these things, scared the life out of me. I manged to turn it off and went back sleep. My mate could not be more sorry, he clean forgot about it.
noise747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 20:55
davor
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 5,203
This is nothing new and I don't understand why all the fuss about it all of a sudden? I have a Samsung smart tv, and I knew from day one that Samsung or third parties could be listening to private conversations via voice recognition technology. I used the voice feature on my telly for a few months when it was novelty, but I had disabled it soon over privacy concerns.

I'm more worried about the smart phones doing the same thing. Anyone can basically eavesdrop on you through the smartphone, listen and record anything, or hijack the phone camera. This is much worse than a tv, because we carry our phones everywhere we go. At least you can disable the mic on your tv, but you can't do it on your phone, and your phone is "listening" all the time, especially if there is Shazam or similar apps installed.
davor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 21:11
Chris Frost
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 6,462
LG TVs raised similar concerns. Their sets were reporting back on view habits too.
Chris Frost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 23:01
neo_wales
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Wales/Gran Canaria
Posts: 8,299
well you don't know because you did not read the the article via the link, but you do that a lot
Be quiet troll, go forth and haunt the halls of trolls, your nonsense now falls on deaf ears
neo_wales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 00:10
trayhop123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 865
i dont know if any of you guys are old enough to remember the tv scene from kentucky fried movie lol


but erm ,,,,,,, i suppose they do now have the technology

so no more slipping the mrs one on the sofa lol
trayhop123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 10:33
noise747
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,810
This is nothing new and I don't understand why all the fuss about it all of a sudden? I have a Samsung smart tv, and I knew from day one that Samsung or third parties could be listening to private conversations via voice recognition technology. I used the voice feature on my telly for a few months when it was novelty, but I had disabled it soon over privacy concerns.
I do not have a smart TV, I have a old Philips Plasma, well, 6 years old, it must be that by now and it works well. I can make it act like a smart TV, by sticking my PS3 on it and the now TV box. also if I wanted to I could put some sort of Android based unit on it.

when this Tv set goes belly up I will try and get a non-smart TV set, i know it will become more difficult as time goes by because they want us to have this integration. If I have to buy a smartTv set, it will never be connected to the net. Still hopefully that will be a few years away, i hope my plasma last for at least another 5 yers.

The only problem with the plasma is it uses so much power.


I'm more worried about the smart phones doing the same thing. Anyone can basically eavesdrop on you through the smartphone, listen and record anything, or hijack the phone camera. This is much worse than a tv, because we carry our phones everywhere we go. At least you can disable the mic on your tv, but you can't do it on your phone, and your phone is "listening" all the time, especially if there is Shazam or similar apps installed.
That is true, but Shazam only works when you use it, it do not listen all the time.

If someone wants to hijack a phone camera they are not going to see much most of the time, My phone is lying on the desk, so the back camera would see nothing and the front would see the ceiling, if i am out it will be in my pocket.

I do agree with you about the mic and yes it could be hijacked I suppose. But sometimes we just have to bite the bullet and go with it.

I read a while back about TV sets that have built in skype and that it is possible for it to be hijacked, but to be honest that chance of it happening is tiny.

But a TV set that do send info to third parties like the Samsung is ideal to be honest, i have notice that Samsung now deny it. they should make up their mind.
noise747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 10:34
noise747
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,810
Be quiet troll, go forth and haunt the halls of trolls, your nonsense now falls on deaf ears
You have just proved what I said.
noise747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 11:32
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
Well Samsung to not denie it in fact
Samsung said: "If a consumer consents and uses the voice recognition feature, voice data is provided to a third party during a requested voice command search. At that time, the voice data is sent to a server, which searches for the requested content then returns the desired content to the TV.
They use a 3rd party service for voice recognition, so it is not done locally. Which means when the voice commands are on, the TV sends everything it listens to and that looks like a command (possibly with German accent) to that 3rd party service for analysis. What the 3rd party does with the voice recording it received is out of Samsung's hands and that's basically what they are saying, they are washing their hands of any responsibility. It's a typical disclaimer, but yes, there's a reason to get concerned.

I think the solution would be to have a way to activate the voice recognition by a certain noise recognisable locally (clap your hands, for example, or say "Listen on"), turn on some LED and listen until the end of the voice command or saying "Listen off" or whatever. As it is, it's a bit too open. It does not have to be the 3rd party being evil, but one can find a way to intercept the data going to the 3rd party, we heard about possibilities to decrypt SSL communication because of the bugs. Everything is programmed by people who make mistakes.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 11:57
David (2)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S.West England.
Posts: 18,037
You can make a smart tv, "non smart" simply by not connecting it to the Internet.
But you won't be able to use any of the online features.
David (2) is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 16:34
TeeGee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dark Satanic Mills
Posts: 4,821
i dont know if any of you guys are old enough to remember the tv scene from kentucky fried movie lol
but erm ,,,,,,, i suppose they do now have the technology

so no more slipping the mrs one on the sofa lol
or the hearthrug.......
TeeGee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 16:36
gomezz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,597
And connecting a PS3 or other smart device to a non-smart TV only shifts the problem.
gomezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 16:40
noise747
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,810
They use a 3rd party service for voice recognition, so it is not done locally. Which means when the voice commands are on, the TV sends everything it listens to and that looks like a command (possibly with German accent) to that 3rd party service for analysis. What the 3rd party does with the voice recording it received is out of Samsung's hands and that's basically what they are saying, they are washing their hands of any responsibility. It's a typical disclaimer, but yes, there's a reason to get concerned.

I think the solution would be to have a way to activate the voice recognition by a certain noise recognisable locally (clap your hands, for example, or say "Listen on"), turn on some LED and listen until the end of the voice command or saying "Listen off" or whatever. As it is, it's a bit too open. It does not have to be the 3rd party being evil, but one can find a way to intercept the data going to the 3rd party, we heard about possibilities to decrypt SSL communication because of the bugs. Everything is programmed by people who make mistakes.
i wonder what would happen if that third party ceased trading?
I noticed they do not name the third party, I also noticed that they now deny the spying part
noise747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 16:40
stud u like
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Sunny Side Of The Street
Posts: 40,106
Why on earth would anyone want voice recognition on a Tv for anyway?
To search on the internet,to change channels or watch "Emmerdale".
stud u like is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 16:42
noise747
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,810
You can make a smart tv, "non smart" simply by not connecting it to the Internet.
But you won't be able to use any of the online features.
I have no idea why they are called smart TV anyway, because they are not. To be honest what is needed is a standard UI, too many manufactures have too many different user interfaces.

Been the same for years to be honest, even digital boxes are all different.

Oh yes as you said just do not connect them to the net, I bet there are thousands of so called smart Tv sets not connected to the net. i know at least 3-4 people myself.
noise747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 16:43
noise747
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,810
And connecting a PS3 or other smart device to a non-smart TV only shifts the problem.
How so?
noise747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 17:23
neo_wales
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Wales/Gran Canaria
Posts: 8,299
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/0...n_6647762.html

Just turn off voice recognition.
neo_wales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 17:26
Richardcoulter
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,703
Why on earth would anyone want voice recognition on a Tv for anyway?
I can see them being useful for those with dexterity problems ir the sight impaired.
Richardcoulter is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:01.