Originally Posted by cuttlefishspike:
“Please God no. Like I said before, we the role should not go to a comedian.
And besides, AE can't act.”
Well that's the main thing,..whether he can act or not.
I never said I want him to be the new Doctor, I just think he's a good one to put on the list of options.
Reason being is that it seems that too many people are hearing one name "David Tennant" and instantly thinking "Yeah, let's have him as the Doctor",..when there are many, many capable actors who have also proven their talent.
Being a comedian shouldn't be an obstacle as long as they are capable of acting the part.
I see many people, myself included, who have said that (Actor X) would be good because he has a quirky quality.
I'm starting to think that this isn't necesarily good criteria for selecting the actor to play the Doctor.
Because I think the most important criteria should be acting ability above all else.
An excellent actor should be able to do "quirky" if that's required.
You could get a guy who's "quirky", but it doesn't necessarily mean he's going to be good at the role if he hasn't got the range of emotions needed to play the role.
But I would like to see a lot more options available than just going for the flavour of the month, David Tennant, and just agreeing straight away.
There's lots of good actors out there, once you start thinking about it, you can come up with many, many good choices as opposed to just David Tennant.
Someone earlier in the thread mentioned David Morrisey. I can imagine him being excellent. You can really see him being a dark, angry, aggressive, edgy, moody, emotionally intense Doctor.
Like I say it's more than just being about being quirky or charming,..you might end up with a complete lightweight playing the Doctor who can't do the darker shades,....a good range is probably more important, and quirkiness and charm being just being emotions you'd expect a good actor to be able to communicate to the viewer anyway.