|
||||||||
EastEnders - Kathy Beale returns (Merged) |
| View Poll Results: Is Kathy Beale about to return to EE? | |||
| Yes - It looks like she is coming back |
|
173 | 45.17% |
| No - They wouldnt do it! |
|
128 | 33.42% |
| Unsure |
|
82 | 21.41% |
| Voters: 383. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,009
|
I actually wouldn't be averse to it but how would they explain why Kathy abandoned ben for years?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,947
|
So does people actually think she is returning? I hope she is... but I doubt it
don't wanna get me hopes up for nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Downtown
Posts: 5,810
|
Quote:
I thought Gillian Taylforth had agreed to do guest appearances every few months for Hollyoaks - and that she quit to spend time with her family?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,124
|
Thing is, did Kate Harwood (who was EP at the time of her reported death) intend Kathy to be actually killed off, so DTC just retconned her idea? Or was it a way to leave the door open for a return, as she never died onscreen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,553
|
Quote:
Where is this crackpot nonsense coming from ???
This is not Hollyoaks |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,951
|
Quote:
Or she quit because she realised that Hollyoaks was pile of nonsensical and being with her family was an excuse so she could make an appearance on a better soap.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
Kathy is not returning. Don't know where this is coming from.
There is no realistic reason I have ever heard. Adam Woodyatt said it wasn't realistic too. It would take away from the reveal. And moreover they wouldn't have done the recent ghosts of Walford if she was coming back with her in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,553
|
Quote:
Of course she isn't . DTC isn't that stupid.
There is no realistic reason I have ever heard. Adam Woodyatt said it wasn't realistic too. It would take away from the reveal. And moreover they wouldn't have done the recent ghosts of Walford if she was coming back with her in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,701
|
Quote:
Or she quit because she realised that Hollyoaks was pile of nonsensical and being with her family was an excuse so she could make an appearance on a better soap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,576
|
Quote:
Thing is, did Kate Harwood (who was EP at the time of her reported death) intend Kathy to be actually killed off, so DTC just retconned her idea? Or was it a way to leave the door open for a return, as she never died onscreen?
I do think there may possibly be a plausable way to bring Kathy back. However, I just don't think EastEnders would go there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Brighton
Posts: 1,973
|
Quote:
If DTC is able to undo past mistakes by bringing back original character Kathy Beale/Mitchell to our screen he will go down as one of the best producers EE has ever had.
It would also show that he has a pair unlike Santer and Birkwood who decided not to bring her back somehow. Maybe DTC has got more balls! he was there with Santer so probably came up with the storyline also. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,951
|
Quote:
Where is this crackpot nonsense coming from ???
This is not Hollyoaks ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 269
|
This returnee to the wedding... Could that not be Martin?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,947
|
I hoping Kathy is returning but i'm not gonna get that excited incase it doesn't happen. I'm gonna remain only slightly positive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,237
|
"Oh Ben dear, there you are. You know the way your life has been a complete disaster for the last 10 years, well that needn't have happened because I was alive the whole time. Isn't that funny? Now what's for the dinner?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,428
|
Quote:
This returnee to the wedding... Could that not be Martin?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,716
|
Quote:
I thought Gillian Taylforth had agreed to do guest appearances every few months for Hollyoaks - and that she quit to spend time with her family?
I'm kidding (sort of) but it would be one hell of a shocker! |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Brighton
Posts: 1,973
|
Quote:
"Oh Ben dear, there you are. You know the way your life has been a complete disaster for the last 10 years, well that needn't have happened because I was alive the whole time. Isn't that funny? Now what's for the dinner?"
Could this explain his actions on Good Friday? Lucy found something out about Ben which he didn't want her to tell Ian about. Jay pretty much confirmed this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: #EE#TheCarters
Posts: 11,310
|
I have always stated in the past Kathy Beale can not return, she is dead. However over the past week after reading the spoilers what I have read and then after what I have seen in this evenings episode have made me think OMG are they??? Would they??? Could they??? Should they???
Billy referred what ever the secret is is dead and buried Peggy asked Phil if he was sure, what would Sharon think and that it was in his past Phil had to tell Ian whatever he seemed to have discovered Sharon next week feels as though she isn't part of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 269
|
Quote:
He is already there
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,947
|
Quote:
I have always stated in the past Kathy Beale can not return, she is dead. However over the past week after reading the spoilers what I have read and then after what I have seen in this evenings episode have made me think OMG are they??? Would they??? Could they??? Should they???
Billy referred what ever the secret is is dead and buried Peggy asked Phil if he was sure, what would Sharon think and that it was in his past Phil had to tell Ian whatever he seemed to have discovered Sharon next week feels as though she isn't part of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Remember Ben told Phil the "full story" of what happened that night and we didn't see it. I don't think Ben killed Lucy but I think its a major clue. And he was getting a passport out. Its nothing to do with Zombie Kathy.
This is something to do with Ben and what happened. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,176
|
Quote:
I wonder if Ben already knows.
Could this explain his actions on Good Friday? Lucy found something out about Ben which he didn't want her to tell Ian about. Jay pretty much confirmed this. I love these theories about Kathy, but it's probably something much more mundane. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,802
|
Quote:
I find the best thing to do with all the bring back Kathy and Pat posts is to laugh at them - I can't take them seriously at all
![]() ![]() The things the way I see it: 1) Gillian Taylforth is no longer with Hollyoaks. Her last episode was 15th January. 2) Gillian has on more than one occasion expressed her strong desire to return. 3) Even Gillian herself does not believe Kathy is really dead. 4) The "death" of Kathy in 2006 was suspicious. When Ian went over to "bury" Kathy a mere few days after the accident he found that her body was already "buried" before he arrived. 5) DTC was involved with Santer's plan to revive Kathy. 6) Hints tonight by Sharon and Ian about being "orphans". 7) Phil has something to tell Ian that is likely unconnected with the murder of Lucy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 35,274
|
I thought NO until tonight.
Phil saying to Ian ''I need to talk to you'' and then we never went back to that scene again. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:48.




don't wanna get me hopes up for nothing.
