|
||||||||
still think jac jossas absence had the story altered |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,342
|
still think jac jossas absence had the story altered
She has the major build off but little pay off.
not saying she was planned as the muderer but i do think her absence caused things to change especially with the week pay off in bobby |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,428
|
Bobby was always the Killer and you will understand in future episodes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: here
Posts: 4,814
|
They did say the killer was changed early on because "it didn't work".
I think it was originally supposed to be Cindy but it didn't work because there is simply no way that Jane would cover up the death of the girl she pretty much raised for a girl she barely knew. The only person she would ever do that for is Bobby. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: KellieBright♥
Posts: 5,519
|
In the early stages DTC toyed with the idea of Cindy but someone else suggested bobby and he went with that. It was always going to be Jane involved.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Has it been stated that it was initially Cindy then?
I absolutely believe that nothing has been changed since the initial planning stages. They came up with one killer, couldn't make it work then cam up with Bobby and Jane covering. Al this was decided in Autumn 2013 before filming started and way before jac Jossa fell pregnant so would be unavailable for live filming. She might perhaps have been more involved, some of the scenes done live in the Square rather than pre recorded but she was never going to be the killer. I don't think that it being Bobby is a 'weak' resolution at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,862
|
Queen Jossa
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,859
|
When was tonight's later episode filmed when Hetti left or in sync with the rest?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kent
Posts: 1,722
|
Quote:
When was tonight's later episode filmed when Hetti left or in sync with the rest?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Posts: 15,938
|
Quote:
When was tonight's later episode filmed when Hetti left or in sync with the rest?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridge Street
Posts: 3,085
|
I think if Jac Jossa hadn't been pregnant, there would have been no abortion/baby storyline (that was just to get her out of the Square for the live elements around Abi/Tanya)
And I think that there would have been no card. Lauren would have been in that scene with Jane telling her she knows what happened. Then be interrupted by Tanya. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Quote:
When was tonight's later episode filmed when Hetti left or in sync with the rest?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 18,069
|
I think Jac's pregnancy will have brought the Peter marriage and baby into fruition, but no qay has it had a major outcome on the killer storyline.
It's now been confirmed as Bobby from the start (they were only considering Cindy as they were breaking the story. I guess she was always their backup plan too in case they chickened out on Bobby or his rl parents stopped it or something) |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:42.


