• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Nadia. How she was perceived by some.
<<
<
2 of 7
>>
>
Bunions
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“I really don't see what's so intriguing - honestly I don't. She is/was a nice lady in the house and she had a friendship with Perez. Yes she was supportive of him that's what friends do ............can't be doing with all this 'enabling' rubbish though - far too silly - people making up psychobabblish nonsense,

Far more intriguing is people bending over backwards to defend Hopkins behaviour both inside and outside the house - I think there's a lot on here that seriously need to have a word with themselves.”



Originally Posted by blahblahblah57:
“ Now leave Bunions alone. Have another drink Bunions and just ignore Twinkle. ”

Oh, don't worry about me

I took no notice................I didn't know WTF 'Pahhhh haaah' meant anyway

I don't drink but reading this board some days makes me think it might be a good idea
Twinkle toes no
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by blahblahblah57:
“ Now leave Bunions alone. Have another drink Bunions and just ignore Twinkle. ”

Why ignore little Twinkles?
Flora_McDonald
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Jubadi:
“I think she did herself proud. She was warm, genuine, loyal, funny and most importantly, independent-minded.”

My feelings entirely. She lit up the house when she smiled, and struck me as the most sincere person in there.

I loved her.
Twinkle toes no
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Flora_McDonald:
“My feelings entirely. She lit up the house when she smiled, and struck me as the most sincere person in there.

I loved her.”

I loved her too. Lovely woman x
blahblahblah57
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Bunions:
“

Oh, don't worry about me

I took no notice................I didn't know WTF 'Pahhhh haaah' meant anyway

I don't drink but reading this board some days makes me think it might be a good idea ”

It's essential when on this board. Not too much mind or you'll say something you regret.

Originally Posted by Twinkle toes no:
“Why ignore little Twinkles? ”

Awww Twinkle don't be sad. Here, have a wee glass of Prosecco.
Twinkle toes no
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by blahblahblah57:
“It's essential when on this board. Not too much mind or you'll say something you regret.
X


Awww Twinkle don't be sad. Here, have a wee glass of Prosecco. ”

Can I have a big glass? Why can't I like Nads blah?
Matt_Maher
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Twinkle toes no:
“I think my post said it all”


Not at all.
I responded perfectly well to the thread, stating my opinions on the thread topic.
You decided to just call my opinion ridiculous without explaining why. It's almost like it angered you (no idea why it did) so much that any reasoned response went out the window.
viva.espana
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“I really don't see what's so intriguing - honestly I don't. She is/was a nice lady in the house and she had a friendship with Perez. Yes she was supportive of him that's what friends do ............can't be doing with all this 'enabling' rubbish though - far too silly - people making up psychobabblish nonsense,

Far more intriguing is people bending over backwards to defend Hopkins behaviour both inside and outside the house - I think there's a lot on here that seriously need to have a word with themselves.”

You think she was a 'nice lady'. I plainly don't.

What's all the ^ Hopkins noise about? And why are you using my post to go on about those who support Hopkins?
Penny Crayon
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by viva.espana:
“ You think she was a 'nice lady'. I plainly don't.

What's all the ^ Hopkins noise about? And why are you using my post to go on about those who support Hopkins?”

Simply because you found it intriguing - I said my bit and then said what I found intriguing - it's called a two way discussion I thought.
Twinkle toes no
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Matt_Maher:
“Not at all.
I responded perfectly well to the thread, stating my opinions on the thread topic.
You decided to just call my opinion ridiculous without explaining why. It's almost like it angered you (no idea why it did) so much that any reasoned response went out the window.”

I'm not angry. Blahs just given me a nice big glass of wine so I am now mellow ......
Bunions
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Twinkle toes no:
“Can I have a big glass? Why can't I like Nads blah?”

You can

I don't hate her, I really don't

If anything, I feel disappointed with her because I thought she'd be way more fun and chilled and interesting.

If she'd have been less interfering and hadn't done her 'mother hen' thing, she'd have been in with a bloody good chance IMO

I mean, KP won by default as an anti-Katie Gobshite protest really.
Twinkle toes no
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Bunions:
“You can

I don't hate her, I really don't

If anything, I feel disappointed with her because I thought she'd be way more fun and chilled and interesting.

If she'd have been less interfering and hadn't done her 'mother hen' thing, she'd have been in with a bloody good chance IMO

I mean, KP won by default as an anti-Katie Gobshite protest really.”

I guess you are are one of those who have 'alerted' me? No worry I've been banned before . Silly really cos I've never 'alerted' anyone for giving an opinion. Xxx
blahblahblah57
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Twinkle toes no:
“Can I have a big glass? Why can't I like Nads blah?”

Indeed you can. Of course you can like Nadia. I was being facetious. You were comparing yourself to Nadia by, jokingly, telling Bunions to go to bed - which I found funny - and I, jokingly, told Bunions to ignore you as he/she found that side of Nadia annoying.

But it all backfired on me. I, obviously, did not make myself too clear - too much prosecco (I should take my own advice).

I like Nads, you like Nads and IMO everyone should like Nads.

Och, I'm away for another prosecco - come join me.
Bunions
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Twinkle toes no:
“I guess you are are one of those who have 'alerted' me? No worry I've been banned before . Silly really cos I've never 'alerted' anyone for giving an opinion. Xxx”

WTF?? I've no idea what you're on about

I'm about the LAST person on here who'd report anyone because I'm no angel.

I'm posting with you ffs - why would you even think that?

This place does my head in sometimes and you need to look elsewhere mate.
Captain Kipper
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by xXxAnneAxXx:
“Nadia is a normal level headed woman. ”

Yeah, so level headed that she actually wanted to call the police on a 70 year old bloke who made a few crude remarks in the house.
kravchic
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by blahblahblah57:
“Indeed you can. Of course you can like Nadia. I was being facetious. You were comparing yourself to Nadia by, jokingly, telling Bunions to go to bed - which I found funny - and I, jokingly, told Bunions to ignore you as he/she found that side of Nadia annoying.

But it all backfired on me. I, obviously, did not make myself too clear - too much prosecco (I should take my own advice).

I like Nads, you like Nads and IMO everyone should like Nads.

Och, I'm away for another prosecco - come join me.”

I love her. I can't see what's not to like. I do get what people have said about her being OTT, bossy and interfering, but I only saw that in some of her interactions with Ken, Jeremy had already been booted by the time I started watching so never saw how she dealt with the Chloe boob grabbing issue., ok she may have arguably put a foot wrong when dealing with Ken, but imo she redeemed herself when she courageously went against the crowd in support of her genuine ( in my eyes), friendship with Perez. She demonstrated strength of character, loyalty, that makes her my kind of person. Anyone would be lucky to have her as a friend.
viva.espana
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“Simply because you found it intriguing - I said my bit and then said what I found intriguing - it's called a two way discussion I thought.”

But yet you need to bring Hopkins into a discussion that has nothing to do with her, solely to try and make Nadia look better?

Can you not defend Nadia on her own merits?
Matt_Maher
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Yeah, so level headed that she actually wanted to call the police on a 70 year old bloke who made a few crude remarks in the house. ”


I think bitterness had something to do with that.
Helenbemerry
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by Matt_Maher:
“Before she was in CBB I didn't have any opinion of her, if anything it was vaguely positive. She used to be in Eastenders, that's all I knew about her.

My dislike of her didn't really have much to do with her befriending Perez.
She just showed herself to be the type of person I really don't like. Someone who goes around with a holier than thou attitude, thinks they have the right to tell people what's offensive and what they should be thinking, someone who displays faux-offence thinking it will make them come across like a better person etc.
I think she's a very false person.

The fact that her entire gameplan centred on slaying the dragon that is Katie Hopkins and it spectacularly failed was funny tho.”

Not a ridiculous post at all and you have made some good observations. I really liked Nadia before she went in but was very disappointed by her in the house.
blahblahblah57
20-02-2015
Originally Posted by kravchic:
“I love her. I can't see what's not to like. I do get what people have said about her being OTT, bossy and interfering, but I only saw that in some of her interactions with Ken, Jeremy had already been booted by the time I started watching so never saw how she dealt with the Chloe boob grabbing issue., ok she may have arguably put a foot wrong when dealing with Ken, but imo she redeemed herself when she courageously went against the crowd in support of her genuine ( in my eyes), friendship with Perez. She demonstrated strength of character, loyalty, that makes her my kind of person. Anyone would be lucky to have her as a friend.”

I agree.

When the Jeremy incident occurred Nadia was fabulous. Chloe was upset but quiet and Cami wanted to kick off big time announcing what happened to everyone hysterically. Nadia managed to quieten her down at the same time as consoling Chloe. She did really well.

As I've said already I think she did go over the top re Ken - not in her reaction to his behaviour more in the chasing him into the garden when he was cycling.

On the whole, she was a kind, generous, supportive and intelligent hm and a good friend.

I loved watching her.
ABCZYX
21-02-2015
Originally Posted by xXxAnneAxXx:
“Nadia is a normal level headed woman. I admired her loyalty to the friendship she chose and her refusal to hunt with the hounds against Perez. Id like to think that I would behave in the same way should a group of people try to instruct me on who I should and shouldn't interract with.

The behaviour in there was verging on pack mentality and this behaviour was what changed my mind and opinion about Perez.

To me the friendship between Nadia and Perez was the most genuine one in there.”

I agree. Nadia liked Perez and she wasn't going to let anyone change her mind about him. I like it when HMs aren't afraid to stick with their opinion about someone or something when they think it's morally, the right thing to do, even when they know that it'll make them unpopular with the majority of the house. And that was Nadia.
Gnomsie
21-02-2015
I swung back and forth with Nadia.
I liked her before the house, but I wasn't a fan of her 'mothering'. She reminds me of my auntie, thinks she knows best and will forever treat me like a child. Drives me potty!
But I don't see it as malicious.
She won me round again though with her support of Perez. I wasn't a giant fan of the lad, especially not at first, but the treatment of him pushed me more 'pro-Perez' than I would have been had he not become the victim.
Takes a tough person to go against the crowd and support someone with few fans, especially when it has such an effect on your experience too.
loopyluna
21-02-2015
I was so shocked at how she was perceived.
i thought she was amazing and true to herself.
droogiefret
21-02-2015
Her appreciation thread was and is pretty popular - more so than most housemates this season.

I come to the conclusion that most people liked her, but the minority who didn't were pretty vocal about it. I don't think you can count the crowd reaction at the live shows as they are just orchestrated by low end newspapers.
loopyluna
21-02-2015
Originally Posted by droogiefret:
“Her appreciation thread was and is pretty popular - more so than most housemates this season.

I come to the conclusion that most people liked her, but the minority who didn't were pretty vocal about it. I don't think you can count the crowd reaction at the live shows as they are just orchestrated by low end newspapers.”


As Patsy called the crowd "idiots in anoraks"
<<
<
2 of 7
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map