Now I know you're baiting.

"Got to say i'm with her 100% on this one. I'm only usually with her 90%."

So you're 100% behind your 'leader' when she says it would be better for Perez' beloved son for his father to kill himself.

Not the point at all and you're taking my post completely out of context.

Plus Perez brought her children into things because he thought that may get a rise out of her.

I doubt anyone would say it was a good taste comment but by then he had been bullied for days and was snapping back in frustration I think. I find it easier to forgive him because of how he was being treated.

Perez got her children involved in the original comment and I think that response is perfectly acceptable.

I don't know why you keep saying 'your leader' seeing as i've never said on here that anyone leads me. Very odd comment to make, let alone make twice.

When did he do that ?

No he didn't at all.

She said .if you were my child ...............................

He responded with - if I were your child.

It was all hypothesis.

Hopkins then went on to tell us about how perfect her children's lives were compared in that they had a mum and a dad and siblings - unlike Perez's son.

His original comment about if he was her child he'd kill himself, that's bringing her family into what was a petty argument.
Perez did that a few times, he tried to say things which he thought would genuinely hurt the other person, and all as a part of a petty silly argument. What a nice man!

But once he had escalated things like that then for me it would have been free territory to do the same to him. Focus on what you know would hurt him (his weight issues) and start to work on that.

Hopkins' comment about his back fat was genius, because it dug deep and really hurt him.

No he did not. She brought in children by saying if he were her child bla bla. Don't twist this just for the sake of it.
He never once said anything about her children or her killing herself FGS.
This is not a perfectly acceptable or reasonable response in any sense of the word.
There is no excuse for saying such a vicious thing about anyone.

Jesus, I don't get your posts at all.

There is no comparison at all between the two comments.
The context. She brought up if he was her child, he responded with his thoughts about if he was her child. Nothing at all to do with her children.
I don't know why I'm surprised. It's what she does and she will stop at nothing to keep her bitter vacuous self in the public arena.

Did KH first say "If you were my child, I would lock you in a cupboard"? or WTTE.

In your opinion.

And in many other people's including mine.

No that is what was said, so opinion doesn't enter into it.

That wasn't an opinion. That was what happened - that was how it was said.

Opinions are one thing - black and white - hard - evidence is another.

Single parent families are inferior. She should know, she's made enough of them. Once more pandering to the stupid in society. What a badge of honour 'really stupid people love me'.

His comment was a RESPONSE!

Twisting and taking one comment out of a conversation to suit a particular agenda of supporting cruel and hurtful comments seems to be the aim here.

If you believe it is okay to focus on how you can hurt someone and try to get others to agree with you, that is up to you but you won't succeed in achieving that.

All i'm saying is that if you are in a heated argument with someone then you will say something which you know will hurt them if you have it in your arsenal.
People on here can pat themselves on the back and claim 'oh i'd never do such a thing' and that's all well and good.
But it's like when two really close people, such as a couple, have a furious row. Things can be said which are very cutting and hurtful because they know each other so well and know what the weak points are.
It doesn't make you a bad person, it's just a natural thing. You're not going to be in a slanging match with someone and think "ooh i better not say that, it might upset them a bit".

You're the gift that keeps giving Matt.




q=digging+mole+tumblr+gif&biw=1088&bih=514&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=rofoVMCkB4bX7QbO14HQAg&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ#tbm=isch&q=grave+digger+job&revid=1395408996&imgdii=_&imgrc=A2-yHhT8lEEwzM%253A%3BLghOgPmNFsyOyM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fupload.wikimedia.org%252Fwikipedia%252Fcommons%252Fb%252Fbd%252FVasnetsov_Grave_digger.JPG%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fen.wikipedia.org%252Fwiki%252FGravedigger%3B880%3B1265[/url]
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ave_digger.JPG

So who was KH arguing with in the magazine interview in your original post?

OOOOH ER = Sorry ^^

Penny, your links

Quick quick

Stretching the thread.

It's truly fascinating to watch Hopkins fans drape themselves in evermore-nonsensical regalia. She's like the pied piper for the obtuse or something.

I think it's the first one.

Delete quick.