Originally Posted by Muze:
“Not sure how this is the fault of the RSPCA tbh.
You let a frail, unwell cat out to roam unsupervised, someone cared enough to raise concerns about her welfare and the authorities took action.
It's sad that it led to her death, but you are responsible for allowing her to roam in that condition, any minor trauma may have had the same result.
I don't like the RSPCA, but it's about time cat owners man up and stop blaming everyone but themselves when there pets encounter hazards whilst free roaming.”
Cats have the legal right to free roam. I accept there are hazards for cats who free roam but I am not sure how free roaming caused this cat's death except in that someone who saw her outside reported her to the RSPCA.
To be honest, I don't really think the RSPCA did much wrong in this particular instance in that they didn't euthanase the cat, like they have done on other reported occasions. They did the responsible thing in getting the cat seen by a vet. It's hardly the fault of the RSPCA that the cat was so traumatised by the experience of being at a vet's surgery.
The RSPCA should certainly have communicated better with the owner but perhaps they felt this was a real case of neglect.
It's a bit like the plight of social workers - pilloried for
not taking action when needed
and for taking 'inappropriate action'. A lot of it is down to personal judgement of a situation, it can be very difficult to make the right call.