The SPC4's work well: Independent control of two Sky boxes via the same Sky Eye/RF distribution system is a neat trick. I've used them in a few installs. I haven't come across a cheaper way of doing that.
I don't know what loft box you were considering, but you certainly you don't need to spend on one with any satellite inputs. Just make sure it passes the 12V to make the Sky eyes work. Whether or not you want or need FM and DAB inputs is another question to ask yourself before spending.
With aerials, height and unimpeded line of sight are the two primary considerations. If you can get those then you're laughing. There are mounts designed to go on the tiled roof of houses without chimneys.
LINK. Alternatively the more common solution is a pair of wall brackets that clear the house eaves (T & K brackets) and then will take a tall pole. 10ft, 12ft and 16ft alloy masts are pretty widely available. They don't rust. If you need taller then 20ft steel is an option, but you might want to consider getting that painted before installation.
Log Periodics are brilliant. They're the only aerial with a flat enough response curve that you get very little signal strength variation from the bottom of the frequency range right through to the top. That's important because there's still more changes planned for the channel allocations as the Government sells off chunks of the TV and Radio spectrum for mobile communications. The plan is to push TV transmissions down to the lower part of the frequency spectrum. This is where all those "wideband, high gain" aerials suck. The Achilles Heel of Logs is their gain. They don't "magnify" the signal's power as much as a good Yagi does. But Yagis and those wideband high gain aerials are tuned to work best only in a narrow frequency band. The right Yagi might work brilliantly today, but if/when the channel allocation changes again in 2018 then the Yagi could end up being useless compared to the Log.
Pretty much all of my installs now are done now with Logs. Sometimes the signal is strong enough that the aerial is all I need. Other times I need to add a Masthead Amp to give enough gain because the signal area is weak. With a Log I know that for as long as we use the the DVB-T/T2 (Freeview) frequency spectrum then the aerial will give great results.
Those DIY meters...
It's difficult to write the next bit without it turning in to a training course. Trying to summarise several days CAI Aerial Installer course knowledge combined with 7 years field experience in a paragraph or two is impossible. So I'll just give you the headlines and then leave you to do a bit of research yourself.
I've seen far too many DIYers struggle with the cheap SLX/Labgear LED meters and the newer DVB-T Signal Finder needle meters. The two main problems are the meter range is too high and the graduations far too coarse for the meters to be much use. For most people their aerials don't generate enough signal to light more than the bottom of the meter's range, so they're hopeless as a direction finder. Beyond that, the meters only take an average reading of the signal strength. There's no indication of signal quality which is actually far more important. You'd be far better carting up a portable Freeview TV and using the signal quality guide off that than wasting your money on the DIY meters.
If you're in a really strong signal area then you'll probably get by more by good luck than good planning. Any losses from the roof (dry/wet/snow) won't be that significant. Buy a Log P, some WF100 cable (that's the good stuff. Don't cheap out with RG6 or -
shudders - 'low loss coax') and some plugs which will be F type for most of your boxes and the eyes, and only an 'aerial' plug for the TV socket. Use a portable, go in the loft and see how you get on. Signal Quality should be 90-100% (or at least that's your aim). Signal strength will be fine at anything from 50-80%. If both are maxed out then buy a 0~20dB variable attenuator. You might find that you need to knock the signal strength down in order to get better signal quality.