DS Forums

 
 

The 'duty' of soap's.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-03-2015, 17:19
SoapGirl95
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: In bed with David Wicks ;-)
Posts: 575

With the current Alicia storyline in Emmerdale, and other storylines, there has been debate over whether or not soaps have a 'duty' to the public or not.

The argument has been whether it is right that ED are showing that a victim of sexual assault has had her case dropped by police due to lack of evidence. Some people think that this being shown in a soap will deter victims from reporting such crimes. Some people think soap's should reflect real life and that this storyline does that. Some people are stuck between the two and don't know either way.

So, in soap's in general, not just ED and not just this storyline, the question's for this thread are

What do people think?
Do soaps have a duty to portray thing's in the way they are likely to happen in real life?
Do they have a duty to encourage people to report crimes rather than deterring them?
Do soaps have a duty to the viewers at all? What is it and where does it stop?
SoapGirl95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 04-03-2015, 18:12
samcains90
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: East Kilbride, Scotland
Posts: 4,341
Soaps are there for entertainment purposes. Mostly light entertainment at that.

I think people who would report it to the police immediately will always do so and those who wouldn't never would. I know that if it happened to me I would report it immediately, and watching Emmerdale certainly wouldn't change my mind. I know what is right and what is wrong, I don't need a soap to tell me.
samcains90 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 18:26
ofthenight
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 343
Soaps are purely for entertainment purposes. They can educate people on serious issues. Although they do occasionally help people but I think they do overestimate the impact they make.
ofthenight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 18:45
joe gillott
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,526
Soaps are there for entertainment purposes. Mostly light entertainment at that.

I think people who would report it to the police immediately will always do so and those who wouldn't never would. I know that if it happened to me I would report it immediately, and watching Emmerdale certainly wouldn't change my mind. I know what is right and what is wrong, I don't need a soap to tell me.
You never know for certain, you might be unable to talk about it like Linda Carter. :/
joe gillott is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 18:51
Mark_Washingto1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 8,047
This is an interesting topic. I know that Agnes Nixon, creator of All My Children and One Life to Live said that is was the soaps job to educate first and entertain second. Given that I think Emmerdale is handling the story well and true to life. There is no way Lachlan would be found guilty given the fact that Alicia was drunk at the time, that alone gives room for reasonable doubt. If they were to show Lachlan being charged and sentenced it would give off a false sense of reality.
Mark_Washingto1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 18:59
Justabloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: up the stairs!
Posts: 11,649
Treating a soap as anything other than a light entertainment programme is an exercise in futility.
They are not there to preach,inform,elucidate or educate.
Justabloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 19:05
rollockingbat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 627
I think it's pretty daft to treat soaps as educational material to be honest. For me, they're nothing more than entertainment. If they help you along the way then that's all great but they should never influence your life. Especially nowadays as they're under more pressure to attract people with sensational storylines. I prefer it when they make things as a realistic as possible which inevitably is always going to feature elements that annoy/offend people.
rollockingbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 19:09
Andybear
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,951
I also think soaps are for entertainment. Some of the storylines are harrowing (this ED one being one of them) but I don't think they have a duty to the viewers. They are after all fictional TV programmes and not documentaries.
Andybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 21:53
CollieWobbles
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,641
No they don't. Soaps are there to entertain, like any other made up tv show and nothing more. If someone is going to do/ not do something/ report/ not report something/ commit a crime, their going to have thought about it/ done it regardless of a storyline on the box in the corner of the living room. Why do people think what they see in a soap is going to infuence viewers? Does watching Superman influence viewers to try leaping off tall buildings in an attempt to fly? No. Does Midsomer Murders influence people into bludgeoning their neighbours to death? No. Because viewers know it's not real, it's just a story and it isn't true to life. So why then should Alicia's case being dropped by the police have people claiming that it'll influence people not to report real incidents? That too is just a story. Why should sane rational viewers who aren't influenced by one tv show suddenly be influenced by another? If you've got the brains to know one isn't real, you know none of them are and just take them for what they are - a source of entertainment.
CollieWobbles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 22:15
melloncollie06
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,184
The same people who complain about the Alicia storyline and say it's a "disgrace" that the charges have been dropped are quite possibly (from the people I know who have said it) the same people who want realism.
well...real life isn't always how we want it to be. simple as that.
melloncollie06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2015, 01:04
Get Den Watts
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,237
If DTC, Birkwood and other soap producers are going to piously blather on about how they are "raising awareness", "telling an important story" and "tackling an issue" and are going to give us the helpline ("if you have been affected by the issues in this episode..."), then YES they have a duty to do it in a responsible, realistic, informative manner and not fill it with ludicrous twists and crass sensationalism.

God knows what the charities and lobby groups that HO worked with on the domestic abuse and male rape storylines made of how the Patrick/Maxine and Finn/JP stories played out on screen.
Get Den Watts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2015, 01:40
Pink_Smurf
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London
Posts: 6,362
Hollyoaks treats serious issues in a ridiculous fashion for example incest between Dodger and Sienna. Unfortunately with rape and sexual assault there often isn't evidence to prove or disprove what happened. I think Emmerdale treated the sexual assault realistically. What I didn't like was the emphasis on Alicia's clothes somehow "being to blame". Only the person raping or sexually assaulting should be held responsible. I think the soaps do try to be responsible on the whole apart from Hollyoaks.
Pink_Smurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2015, 01:44
ryanr554
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,981
Wouldn't it be just as bad if they always (and incorrectly) portrayed it as the person who committed the sexual assault go to jail? That isn't really realistic and misleads people.

I don't think Soaps are going to influence anyones actions any time soon anyway.
ryanr554 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2015, 02:10
dee123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,461
The duty of a soap is to entertain.

THAT IS ALL.
dee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2015, 04:12
dd68
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 16,810
The soaps are entertainment, anything complex shown offers a helpline, the shows are all responsible
dd68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2015, 07:32
norbitonite
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,709
The duty of soap's to clean things, the duty of soaps is to be a serial drama and, within broadcast guidelines, provide entertainment.
norbitonite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2015, 10:04
jsmith99
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,936
..................I don't think Soaps are going to influence anyones actions any time soon anyway.
That's what the TV companies always say - but they still keep selling advertising time.

However, I agree with those saying that a soap has a single duty : to entertain.
jsmith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2015, 11:54
Keeki
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,695
Wouldn't it be just as bad if they always (and incorrectly) portrayed it as the person who committed the sexual assault go to jail? That isn't really realistic and misleads people.

I don't think Soaps are going to influence anyones actions any time soon anyway.
Eastenders' Whitney Dean/Tony King sexual abuse storyline is an example of how soaps can influence the actions of viewers.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s2...p63RyDRAFkpnnW

If EPs choose to work with charities dedicated to whatever social issue they're addressing and the actors talk to victims and survivors they do have a duty to portray the issue realistically. If not they have used a charity to legitimate and publicise their storyline and exploited people who were kind enough to talk about their ordeals and experiences.
Keeki is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15.