|
||||||||
Doctor Who - 2nd April (merged) |
| View Poll Results: What did you think to the episode? | |||
| Very poor |
|
16 | 3.26% |
| Poor |
|
23 | 4.68% |
| Fair |
|
31 | 6.31% |
| Good |
|
76 | 15.48% |
| Very Good |
|
161 | 32.79% |
| Excellent |
|
184 | 37.47% |
| Voters: 491. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#326 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: South Lincs
Posts: 1,862
|
Fantastic!
as the Doctor is fond of saying. The ideas on this thread are mind boggling - lets hope future writers are paying this forum a visit.
Now over to this week's epsiode - another cracker.. H |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#327 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 346
|
Thought I would bump this up from 2005!
Tis funny to read over some of the comments. One about incidental music!! How times have changed, but stay the same eh! Makes for an interesting read |
|
|
|
|
|
#328 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,838
|
Quote:
Thought I would bump this up from 2005!
Tis funny to read over some of the comments. One about incidental music!! How times have changed, but stay the same eh! Makes for an interesting read The complaints, comments and quibbles haved stayed the same throughout Doctor Who since 2005; only the actors names have changed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#329 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 346
|
I had to chuckle at people confused about the time travel bit.....That's sort of the point of Dr. Who!
![]() Also, there was a comment saying about how it wont last....LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
#330 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,478
|
Wow people were already disscussing what kind of Doctor David Tennant would be after only the second CE episode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#331 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Upstairs
Posts: 424
|
Funny that this thread just popped onto Page 1 as I was looking for a link to the very first episode of new Who, "Rose" but darned if I can find one. Anyone able to help?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#332 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 346
|
I reckon it has been bumped in the past and is now deep in the moutains of threads in the forum!! Good luck finding it though
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#333 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
|
Quote:
Got to say, I'm not loving this time travel malarky
|
|
|
|
|
|
#334 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Upstairs
Posts: 424
|
Quote:
I reckon it has been bumped in the past and is now deep in the moutains of threads in the forum!! Good luck finding it though
)http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...=203945&page=2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#335 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The TARDIS
Posts: 11,931
|
Really interersting to read this thread...had a quick look...and some interesting points below.... Quote:
Now that was GOOD! Absolutely classic Dr Who style story - but done with some real style - writing, acting and production.
![]() Quote:
That was unbeleivably GREAT.
SO much better than the diabolical first episode. And next week's looks ace too! My only regret is we won't see Zoe Wannamker's fabulous character again, she was the best thing in it! I wonder if this poster was pleased to see Cassandra again!!! ![]() Quote:
It was boring for the first half an hour...it only got good once the earth started to die...i cant see this having big ratings every week...next week does not look good at all with the ghost storyline...
Quote:
Not as good as the first episode and i doubt it will appeal to the majority of people...it was too much like farscape...if all the episodes continue to be like that one then the ratings will no doubt become very low...
I guess predicting the low ratings isn't a new thing either!!!! ![]()
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:07.




The complaints, comments and quibbles haved stayed the same throughout Doctor Who since 2005; only the actors names have changed
)
