• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Results:What did you think to the episode?
Very poor
16 (3.26%)
Poor
23 (4.68%)
Fair
31 (6.31%)
Good
76 (15.48%)
Very Good
161 (32.79%)
Excellent
184 (37.47%)
Voters: 491. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
Doctor Who - 2nd April (merged)
<<
<
14 of 14
>>
>
bayards
09-04-2005
as the Doctor is fond of saying. The ideas on this thread are mind boggling - lets hope future writers are paying this forum a visit.

Now over to this week's epsiode - another cracker..

H
paul.fisher
25-05-2010
Thought I would bump this up from 2005!

Tis funny to read over some of the comments. One about incidental music!! How times have changed, but stay the same eh!

Makes for an interesting read
jimbo_bob
25-05-2010
Originally Posted by paul.fisher:
“Thought I would bump this up from 2005!

Tis funny to read over some of the comments. One about incidental music!! How times have changed, but stay the same eh!

Makes for an interesting read”

That WAS interesting The complaints, comments and quibbles haved stayed the same throughout Doctor Who since 2005; only the actors names have changed
paul.fisher
25-05-2010
I had to chuckle at people confused about the time travel bit.....That's sort of the point of Dr. Who!

Also, there was a comment saying about how it wont last....LOL
KrisHayward
25-05-2010
Wow people were already disscussing what kind of Doctor David Tennant would be after only the second CE episode.
Zeppelyn56
25-05-2010
Funny that this thread just popped onto Page 1 as I was looking for a link to the very first episode of new Who, "Rose" but darned if I can find one. Anyone able to help?
paul.fisher
25-05-2010
I reckon it has been bumped in the past and is now deep in the moutains of threads in the forum!! Good luck finding it though )
CD93
25-05-2010
Originally Posted by thepuffin:
“Got to say, I'm not loving this time travel malarky”

Nice read. Post of the thread from 2005.
Zeppelyn56
26-05-2010
Originally Posted by paul.fisher:
“I reckon it has been bumped in the past and is now deep in the moutains of threads in the forum!! Good luck finding it though )”

Thanks Paul, I found it quite by accident earlier while browsing through some older threads.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...=203945&page=2
crazzyaz7
27-05-2010
Really interersting to read this thread...had a quick look...and some interesting points below....


Originally Posted by jimscrivener:
“Now that was GOOD! Absolutely classic Dr Who style story - but done with some real style - writing, acting and production.”

I guess New Who being like classic who style is not a new opinion after all


Originally Posted by Drifter:
“That was unbeleivably GREAT.

SO much better than the diabolical first episode. And next week's looks ace too!

My only regret is we won't see Zoe Wannamker's fabulous character again, she was the best thing in it!”


I wonder if this poster was pleased to see Cassandra again!!!

Originally Posted by Mr Blonde:
“It was boring for the first half an hour...it only got good once the earth started to die...i cant see this having big ratings every week...next week does not look good at all with the ghost storyline...”

Originally Posted by Mr Blonde:
“Not as good as the first episode and i doubt it will appeal to the majority of people...it was too much like farscape...if all the episodes continue to be like that one then the ratings will no doubt become very low...”


I guess predicting the low ratings isn't a new thing either!!!!
<<
<
14 of 14
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map