|
||||||||
What's the point in 4G? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,167
|
I live in London and my 4G service is excellent from Three
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,875
|
But it's London. Mobiles actually work in London.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,965
|
Quote:
But it's London. Mobiles actually work in London.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
Vodafone 3G didn't for about a year lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Of course 90% Geographic 4G is going have notspots I don't think anyone has ever said it won't but it is far better than what we have now.
The point of 4G is to make sure people can get connected on the go plain and simple. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,388
|
Quote:
I think some people would like a basic service and feel disillusioned by technology 4G is probably a luxury, clearly by all complaints basic voice services are still poor and 3G too, you can quote percentages as much as you like MIP will help a bit but has been watered down. I think most people would probably never use those super fast speeds but would like something usable, I suspect it will like the broadband rollout full of notspots and problems.
Eventually once enough handsets have changed, 4G Voice (VoLTE) will mean massive improvement in calls from quality through to ability to make a reliable call. Eventually people will not need 3G or 2G except for old devices. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,918
|
Quote:
Networks are rolling out 4G but let's be honest here who even gets 3G most of the time? Even in city centres I'm lucky to even get more than H+.
Most of the time my 3G enabled smartphone is fluctuating between G, where you're lucky if it even manages a simple Google search to H and H+ and in some places I am unable to get a data signal at all. When it does move over to 3G the signal is so bad that I'm actually better off on a good H+ signal than a totally crap 3G one which mostly keeps dropping out. So why oh why are networks now pushing 4G when the majority of the time they can't even offer us 1G? We can't even manage a stable 3G coverage. How about they get that up and running before moving on to the next level? Try walking before you can run. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,875
|
H+ is 3G
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,240
|
Quote:
In Northern Ireland I would say the exact opposite is true. ,
Quote:
Oh yes EE 4G is fantastic, Three on the other hand useless.
Of course there will be rural black spots, but every country in the world has these. To the OP - you're generalising everyone as if their needs are yours. I regularly stream SkyGo and other such apps and require 4G for the highest quality picture. DCHSPA can technically handle decent stream quality but bandwidth suffers from users I find. 4G always gives me more than enough so that I can comfortably tether and still browse on my phone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,324
|
Quote:
You must live in a different Northern Ireland than me. I find 90% of the time I have 4G signal and other than that it's DCHSPA. Friends on 3 rarely have a problem either and I've considered jumping to 3.
Of course there will be rural black spots, but every country in the world has these. To the OP - you're generalising everyone as if their needs are yours. I regularly stream SkyGo and other such apps and require 4G for the highest quality picture. DCHSPA can technically handle decent stream quality but bandwidth suffers from users I find. 4G always gives me more than enough so that I can comfortably tether and still browse on my phone. |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
4G is a transition technology, at the moment its all about fast / reliable data, but 4G as a technology has much more capacity for all uses (Data, calls, texts) than 3G or 2G and as people use more and more of their mobile devices (phones, tablets, laptops with cellular built in) the capacity on 3G and 2G is getting close to the limits.
Eventually once enough handsets have changed, 4G Voice (VoLTE) will mean massive improvement in calls from quality through to ability to make a reliable call. Eventually people will not need 3G or 2G except for old devices. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,046
|
The problem isn't the networks, per se, it's the negative stigma still associated with mobile masts and base stations.
Even though the likes of WHO, HSE, etc., state that there's currently no compelling evidence linking poor health with them, it still doesn't stop people kicking off if they know a mast is going to be installed anywhere near them. Of course, because research continues on them, genuine concerns may be found at some point in the future, but until then, we have to assume that the risks are so low that the negative stigma is unjustified.....especially when you consider the engineers working on the damn things for more than 10yrs are still alive and kicking. 3G is great. H is better.....4G is better still, but probably not really needed by a lot of people. If you're getting H, then not sure what you're complaining about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
Ate you from the past?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,388
|
Quote:
3 is great in towns and cities, in rural areas crap, I live in a rural area, zero coverage from 3 yet I have O2 H+ and EE4g, In saying that H+ is supposed to be fast. 1.2MB on O2, Dire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
Having a £100,000 transmitter that can do HSPA+ is good, but not if you can't pay the £50,000 a month for a 100megabit or faster fibre connection to the mast. EE and Three upgraded connections to masts starting in 2008 when they formed the joined venture company MBNL. Vodafone and O2 have done very little until they started rolling out 4G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 22,789
|
Coverage is getting worse here and not just Vodafone by all accounts. 2G and 3G
i wonder what Three is going to do with the O2 networ, because threee around here is awful and no 2G either. I think they should keep o2 2G. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,324
|
Quote:
Coverage is getting worse here and not just Vodafone by all accounts. 2G and 3G
i wonder what Three is going to do with the O2 networ, because threee around here is awful and no 2G either. I think they should keep o2 2G. |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,396
|
Quote:
Networks are rolling out 4G but let's be honest here who even gets 3G most of the time? Even in city centres I'm lucky to even get more than H+.
Most of the time my 3G enabled smartphone is fluctuating between G, where you're lucky if it even manages a simple Google search to H and H+ and in some places I am unable to get a data signal at all. When it does move over to 3G the signal is so bad that I'm actually better off on a good H+ signal than a totally crap 3G one which mostly keeps dropping out. So why oh why are networks now pushing 4G when the majority of the time they can't even offer us 1G? We can't even manage a stable 3G coverage. How about they get that up and running before moving on to the next level? Try walking before you can run. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 842
|
O2 have just upgraded my area to 4G this month (it's not the coverage maps though, go figure), and these are the type of speeds i'm getting.
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,324
|
Quote:
O2 have just upgraded my area to 4G this month (it's not the coverage maps though, go figure), and these are the type of speeds i'm getting.
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,388
|
Quote:
Now that is impressive, More than double what EE have in this area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,534
|
I will ask the OP's question in a different way: As you can get solid video streaming from iPlayer etc on 3G (OK I actually need the H / H+ variants) why would you need 4G? What do you do that needs it to be so much faster?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,541
|
Quote:
I will ask the OP's question in a different way: As you can get solid video streaming from iPlayer etc on 3G (OK I actually need the H / H+ variants) why would you need 4G? What do you do that needs it to be so much faster?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,875
|
The best 4G speed I have got on O2 is 49Mbps down, 20Mbps up, in Winchester.
It's usually around 25Mbps down, 10Mbps up though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,388
|
Quote:
I will ask the OP's question in a different way: As you can get solid video streaming from iPlayer etc on 3G (OK I actually need the H / H+ variants) why would you need 4G? What do you do that needs it to be so much faster?
A single 3G mast sector can handle say 500 people at once "connected" - Nevermind streaming, these are people getting notifications from apps, game updates, iMessage, WhatsApp, Facebook messenger etc. A single 4G mast sector can handle 4000 people at once "connected". With the sheer number of people in the UK with smartphones and some carrying two, the networks need this increase in capacity. Or in a couple of years things will start to stop work. I would expect to see most 4G networks under loads to give around 10mbps speeds, as we get on 3G today, but for them to be more reliable and none of the 'I have signal so why isn't it working' congestion effects that we see in areas of high usage. (train stations in London etc). |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:48.




