Originally Posted by Zac Quinn:
“What are the BAFTAs based on, then? The National Television Awards award populism and the BAFTAs award technical bravado, isn't that the way of it? Oh I'm so lost.
If only any of this had anything at all to do with how enjoyable it is as a piece of television, eh
Ps I love how the rhetoric has changed over time - first "The Voice has never had a song make the top 10", until Leah McFall ruined that; then "The Voice has never had a number one", until Becky Hill ruined that; now it's how quickly the winner's single takes to slide down the iTunes chart rapidly after getting to number one. Perhaps time to let it go
”
“What are the BAFTAs based on, then? The National Television Awards award populism and the BAFTAs award technical bravado, isn't that the way of it? Oh I'm so lost.
If only any of this had anything at all to do with how enjoyable it is as a piece of television, eh

Ps I love how the rhetoric has changed over time - first "The Voice has never had a song make the top 10", until Leah McFall ruined that; then "The Voice has never had a number one", until Becky Hill ruined that; now it's how quickly the winner's single takes to slide down the iTunes chart rapidly after getting to number one. Perhaps time to let it go
”
The baftas are the biggest joke awards going. Some posh toffs on a panel deciding what qualifies as great television. No thanks. Viewer voted awards are at least fair.
The point is that the winners single rather like the show itself shows signs of promise initially before falling off a cliff edge. The Voice and it's winner have been forgotten already. It's entertaining yes but it's not unmissable event TV and never will be. It's just not all that great. The show would be dead if the BBC hadn't moved it to Q1 where it faces no competition whatsoever.
And what are these great production values you speak of? I've always thought it looks cheap compared to the glitzy ITV talent shows. BGT's production was as good as it gets tonight.




.

