Originally Posted by
Zac Quinn:
“Hmmmm, now you mention it I seem to remember they scrapped a revival of Spitting Image because ITV were trying to insist on including Ant & Dec so you're probably right
”
Originally Posted by Score:
“I think the timing of it is quite deliberate. I'm slightly surprised they can get away with it but I hope they really go for it. It could potentially prove controversial.”
The Ant and Dec thing isn't quite as you say, the problem came because they were talking about doing a new Spitting Image with Roger Law, one of the original creators, and then did a documentary in 2006 for which they made some new Ant and Dec puppets. Law didn't know they were doing new puppets and said ITV should have asked his permission before they did them, so ended the discussions.
There's nothing to say you can't do satire during an election campaign as HIGNFY proves, plus the new Jack Dee series which begins tomorrow on BBC2 and which I've heard nothing about. The only criteria is you have to been totally even-handed and cover all parties equally, and I don't doubt Newzoids will do that because I think it's going to be totally toothless and make no satirical points whatsoever.
Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“Tremendous stuff from BGT -it takes a lot to pull that kind of audience at any time of the year and it continues to do this in the newly released Springtime. Ok for NW-though its far from accepted and next week will be important for it. Play to the Whistle not looking good but BBC1(aside from the rump loyal Casualty audience) is dire. Arguably the Lottery's most popular format really looking threadbare there and well, Atlantis is shot at.”
I don't know about In It To Win It being the most popular lottery format, I think much of that is due to when it's been shown in the past, it just so happens it normally gets quite a cushy slot when ITV are pretty weak. I know it was opposite Britain's Got Talent last year but it got a slightly better lead-in. I don't know if anyone specifically hunts it out or would say it was their favourite quiz, certainly my parents much prefer some of the other formats like Who Dares Wins, as do I.
It's an incredibly long-running format, though, having started thirteen years ago. Must be one of the longest running quizzes in TV history by now.
Originally Posted by grondagronda:
“OK-ish for Ninja. As others say, let's see how it pans out across the run. I fear it might get quite repetitive quite quickly. It really is quite a watered down version of the excellent Japanese original.”
I wonder what the ITV audience will make of Chris Kamara. I didn't like it much, as you say it might get repetitive very quickly and I wonder if the first episode showed more or less everything that it can offer, with people performing extremely badly and people doing very well. When you've seen someone complete the course in ninety seconds and fail in two seconds, is there much else to see? I think it probably would have worked better if they'd imported it before Total Wipeout. Be interesting to see what happens next week when it's opposite the football.
Originally Posted by jlp95bwfc:
“Well they are. The people on panels probably don't even watch half of the programmes regularly.”
That is the point, and that is why awards shows like this judge the prizes based on one sample episode provided by the programme makers - to allow independent judgement based on the merits of that particular show, rather than if you're a fan of it.