Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“Secret Britian has crap competition which means BBC1 gain a default audience. The fact BBC News can beat ITV News despite the latter getting a bigger lead in, in some cases is proof of this. ITV News is not inferior too BBC News.”
“Secret Britian has crap competition which means BBC1 gain a default audience. The fact BBC News can beat ITV News despite the latter getting a bigger lead in, in some cases is proof of this. ITV News is not inferior too BBC News.”
That is a subjective opinion, and I disagree with it. I'm a viewer and I think ITV News is worse than the BBC News. I don't like the presenters as much, I don't like the reporters as much, I don't like how it's not as in depth, I certainly don't like the way they do the weather which tells me nothing and regionally it's much less relevant. In addition, the fact ITV News gets flung around the schedule means there's no incentive for me to try and search it out when I can trust when the BBC News is on.
And yet, back in the nineties, I watched ITV News just as much as the BBC News, if not more. In those days BBC News was terribly unappealing with its relentless Birtism, it was incredibly boring and pompous. ITV had better presenters and a family of reporters and the scheduling was very convenient for me as well, when I was a student I always had my lunch with the 12.30 news and as a family the 5.40 news fitted us just right. And, like ten o'clock, it wasn't the Beeb who forced ITV to move out of those slots.
ITV News used to be by far the most popular news on telly, now it isn't. That's not because of BBC dirty tricks or a default audience but because ITV drove viewers away by relentless tinkering and the Beeb got better. It's wrong to say as a fact that ITV News is as good as BBC News. I say otherwise.
Why do more people buy Coke than buy Pepsi? Because they like Coke better than Pepsi! Same principle.
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“It's this expectation thing. ITV is just police dramas and soaps, so when they do a satirical comedy, nobody watches it as it isn't a police drama or soap, the audience that is there doesn't like it, and the ones that might aren't looking for it. It's an endless circle.
It's just the same situation as Channel 4 and their drama programming. Nobody watches because nobody expects Channel 4 to do much drama. But stick on a factual about gypsies or body parts and people tune in.
Do you try and change perception by commissioning different things or just stick with what does well?”
“It's this expectation thing. ITV is just police dramas and soaps, so when they do a satirical comedy, nobody watches it as it isn't a police drama or soap, the audience that is there doesn't like it, and the ones that might aren't looking for it. It's an endless circle.
It's just the same situation as Channel 4 and their drama programming. Nobody watches because nobody expects Channel 4 to do much drama. But stick on a factual about gypsies or body parts and people tune in.
Do you try and change perception by commissioning different things or just stick with what does well?”
I think that is to totally underestimate the intelligence of the audience. Channel Four has got an amazing history of drama, GBH, Queer as Folk, A Very British Coup and other shows got enormous critical acclaim and, indeed, very high ratings. And then you've got Film Four and all the big successful US dramas they've shown like ER and Lost. Drama has played a huge part in the history of C4, still does, and people are well used to watching it on there. But if it's no good or scheduled badly, they won't.
Same with ITV, the ITV audience are well up for watching challenging and unusual programming, always have been. Things like Cracker and Band Of Gold and The Second Coming all pushed the boundaries and viewers have come to them and they've been huge successes and testament to ITV's bravery. What's been one of the highest rated programmes on ITV this year? The election debate! You can argue people "aren't used to" seeing that on ITV but clearly viewers had the wit to come to ITV to see it. Viewers aren't stupid.
Almost all of the ITV programmes that have failed in primetime have done so because they're simply not strong enough to engage a big audience in primetime because they're not ambitious enough. And I would include Newzoids in that. It's not that the ITV audience can't cope with it, it's because people who might be interested in it are already watching HIGNFY and Newzoids is doing nothing new.
Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“I haven't seen this mentioned in here, but apart from a 45 minute break for the V.E. Day Ceremony and the News, BBC One's election coverage runs for a whopping twenty hours from 21:55 to 18:00.”
“I haven't seen this mentioned in here, but apart from a 45 minute break for the V.E. Day Ceremony and the News, BBC One's election coverage runs for a whopping twenty hours from 21:55 to 18:00.”
Not that much different to how it used to be, though, in 1992 it ran until 4pm (http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/schedules...don/1992-04-10 - Midnight Caller was dropped, and note the fillers schedules after it, with CBBC on BBC2, in case they needed to extend it) and in 1997 as you can see, bar a quick break for Neighbours it was scheduled to run until 4.30 with the potential to continue for longer - http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/schedules...don/1997-05-02 Though in fact it actually finished at about 3.30 because everything that was going to happen had happened.
And in February 1974, as seen on BBC Parliament, it was supposed to finish at 3pm on the Friday but continued until 6.45 - and then came back again at 9.25 for another hour!




