Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“I don't remember it being said that Chicago was temporary. I thought it was a permenant position though how they square that with American Unions I'm not sure if they didn't interview candidates there first.
I think harry and MC are both gone for good.
Jac losing her position whilst on maternity leave is distinctly illegal. They can't just put her back as Junior consultant as it has to be an equal position to the one that was left - I believe. But then demoting Elliot always seemed like an employment tribunal waiting to happen as well.
”
No, it was definitely never said that Chicago was temporary. It was always a permanent job for MC. Also, both Jules and Niamh have confirmed on twitter that they are both off permanently with no plans to return at the moment, although both have said they would consider returns in some capacity in future. I see Niamh has confirmed on a Holby TV interview that the writers intended for Harry and MC to leave together and they awaited her return from The Fall in October to build up the storyline for them both. It kind of makes sense as the whole focus when MC returned in early October in spoilers was how she might be able to help Harry and the majority of her scenes from that time were with him.
I actually like the way they had Jac take maternity leave as her exit. As I've said before, my main interest in her storyline over the past year has been her relationship with Emma and I'm glad to see that they are now going to have her focus on that off screen. I am pretty sure that maternity leave regulations would not allow you to suspend maternity leave for 15 months after your child is born but I will overlook that for the storyline. Also, agree that the promotion of Elliot, demotion of Jac and indeed the first demotion of Elliot are probably tribunals waiting to happen. I forsee a job share for Jac and Elliot if Rosie returns to tie all that up. Either that or Elliot standing down to have more time to himself but I really can't see them demoting him again when she returns.
Just wondering was last night the first time in Holby history that there have been two sunset endings for two sets of permanent characters in the same episode?? I ask because as we've discussed on here happy endings for couples are so rare on Holby in general. In all the time I've been watching I'm not sure I have seen two sunset endings even in relatively close proximity where all four characters were permanent. I've seen very few sunset endings full stop and generally only when one character wasn't permanent in the show.
In fact, last night virtually every character was happy at the end!! Janny, Harry and MC, Essie and Sasha, Elliot for being reinstated, Mo and Elliot for being reunited with team Darwin at the end, Digby having fun at AAU, Raf, Fletch & co happy for Harry and MC and enjoying the party, Serena happy that she had been suggested for CEO, even Selfish was happy enough to have reached a resolution that suited him re neurosurgery. Has there even ever been an episode when so many characters were happy?! I thought it was great. Personally would have liked to have seen Selfish suffer a tad more, but I feel that if he is to remain in the show, even for six more months, they probably went about his standing down in the most realistic way for the character.