Originally Posted by bass55:
“Thank you for addressing the elephant in the room. It's pretty obvious that some people are defending Deano, a rapist, simply because Matt Di Angelo is "fit". Just imagine if Phil or Ian had been the rapist, I doubt many people would be going to such lengths to justify them remaining in the show. These recent attempts by the writers to generate sympathy for Dean are idiotic and insulting. Doting Deano rushing to his dying grandfather's side - oh do me a favour!
Deano is finished as a character. As long as he stays he is dragging everyone around him down to his level; the Carters have been going in circles for months. And, let's face it, Matt Di Angelo is hardly Laurence Olivier, he will be no loss to the show.”
As much as it pains me to say it I think you're right. I'm not for one minute saying that everyone who defends him thinks this way but there's no getting away from the fact that in general he'll be seen as more sympathetic
by some because he's young, he's
very good looking and he does a good 'feel sorry for me' face. Hasn't it been shown in various social experiments that good looking people can get an easier ride in life, that some people tend to warm to them easier than their poorer looking counterparts? That good qualities tend to be automatically bestowed on them all because of a genetic accident? Perhaps these viewers can't help themselves?!
I know it probably won't happen but I'd love to see how much sympathy your ideas of Phil or Ian as rapists would have got. After all, didn't Phil have an awful upbringing himself with a bully of a dad? Look at the hash he'd made of bringing his own kids up due to his own upbringing? And Ian's got mental issues but I bet people wouldn't be rushing to make excuses for him either, lol! They'd just be a disgusting, ugly middle-aged bastard who should be written out!
Originally Posted by NoughtiesMusic:
“I'm sure he'll blame Shirley and (possibly) shoe horn Chelsea in for some reason again. For turning him that way....whatever Dean. That's what he did the last time.”
Oh undoubtedly. Dean can't take responsiblity for
anything. He rapes a woman and practically says it's Shirley's fault. He nearly sets fire to the Vic but hell that's not his fault either, it was wicked Mick who had the cheek to object to his wife being raped! Dean is truly pathetic. I also loathe the way he seems to have forgotten all about Kevin, his proper 'dad'. The one who did all the work and wiped away the tears and snot. Shows me that Dean isn't all that loyal a person.
I can't stand Dean since this rape yet I was really up for his return as I thought that him and Shirley had an interesting backstory which could be further explored but I can't see how a character can possibly come back from becoming a rapist? People still use Emmerdale's Andy Sugden's wife beating to have a go at him
years later, what will they say about a sexual abuser? The worse possible assault you can inflict on a person without killing them? IMO they have ruined a perfectly good character by doing this and have cast a shadow over the Carters as it's all starting to get tedious with the actual rape seeming to come a very poor last to mother-son relationships, family conflicts, family loyalties etc.
Originally Posted by Forget-me-not:
“Probably because soaps are not realistic slices of life - they are more like fairy tales and people want, for the most part, the baddies to get their comeuppance. If the writers stop doing that then in the long term soaps will just decline even more in viewers.”
Very good point. I think you're spot on.
Rape is a heinous crime which some people actually see as worse than murder, where it's hard enough to get convictions without EE seemingly condoning having one staying on the show, and worse, attempting to make them
sympathetic FGS. You can have an understanding of why someone commits an atrocious act without feeling sorry for them so if DTC is attempting to go down the 'feel sorry for him' route I think he's making a huge mistake.