|
||||||||
Another black man shot dead in USA by police officer |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: 我很孤
Posts: 3,532
|
Quote:
If it's a mainly white jury, there's a fair chance in S Carolina that he won't be convicted of murder. Sad to say.
Nothing to do with a white jury on this case, don't read into race too much when it comes to his judgement. In this case & with the damning evidence, he's never getting out. If you want to play the racist Policeman angle that's up to you. The Jury will convict him of first degree murder. (Whatever the makeup.) |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Id
Posts: 12,242
|
If convicted, i don't think it'll be murder, too many loopholes. In particular, regardless of the 8 shots I'm sure a jury will believe that there was no intent to kill. He certainly needs locking up though unless there are factors not recorded on the film that mitigate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: 我很孤
Posts: 3,532
|
Think I'll stay out of this thread now, I've said what I think.
I have a feeling that it's going to go batshit crazy. |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dumfries
Posts: 38,495
|
Quote:
How can you shoot a person 8 times in the back? I'm trying to imagine.
"Stop!" *Bang* (Guy gets hit and falls) How can the other 7 shots happen? Has he got an uzi? Can you be shot 7 times in the back and still require an 8th shot? That's like something out of an Arnie movie. Not to mention that the first shot seems wildly excessive...but 8 times! That sounds like unloading into a corpse! (Have watched the video now and that is one fast gun! If Oswald shot like this guy then I'll buy any JFK theory fed to me.) You don't get a bonus for every bullet you bring back at the end of a shift. If you're working on the assumption that somebody needs shooting, for your own safety or (in the case of a cop) the safety of the public, then, at the risk of sounding callous, you might as well do the job properly. A shooting is a high-stress situation, you don't know how long you'll have your target in your sights and even the best marksmen can't guarantee to hit their target exactly where they intend to so, with that in mind, you don't want to risk firing one shot and then discovering you've missed. The real issue is simply why so many US cops seem to think that their gun is pretty-much the first and only tool to be employed whenever a situation goes awry. In the UK, I've seen a cop-car pull out to pursue a speeding biker on a suburban street and then, within a few seconds, pull over and give up. Clearly, the cop IS thinking about what's going on, there. He's thinking that he hasn't got a chance of catching a speeding biker who doesn't want to be caught. He's thinking that nicking somebody for speeding isn't worth the risk to members of the public which a high-speed chase through a suburban area will create and, finally, he's thinking that it isn't worth ending up with a biker splattered all over the road just for the sake of issuing a speeding ticket. Yank cops just don't seem to think through what they're doing at times. Instead of asking themselves if the situation actually warrants the possible use of deadly force they just seem to charge in and then, when the shit hits the fan, they use a gun to deal with the situation they've provoked. The thing that really worries me is that this is actually some kind of deliberate, unofficial, tactic that US cops have decided to employ in response to the number of cops who've been shot while on duty. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern East Anglia
Posts: 75,211
|
Fortunately for justice, the act was filmed and the video released.
Without that, the strong probability is he'd have got away with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,840
|
Scary. I would be petrified if I was stopped by police in the US especially if I was black. No wonder the guy bolted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: 我很孤
Posts: 3,532
|
Quote:
Fortunately for justice, the act was filmed and the video released.
Without that, the strong probability is he'd have got away with it. This thread will now descend into what if's, police bashing, unrelated posts showing that the law enforcers are are all bastards from cases which happened many years ago. All I can say in my viewing of the video is that a murder was recorded on video. Blueblade, your hate goggles do not make a balanced discussion, they make you look very naive. You won't concede an inch when it comes to the Police. I hope you never get burgled or assaulted. |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern East Anglia
Posts: 75,211
|
Quote:
That's why I'm out.
This thread will now descend into what if's, police bashing, unrelated posts showing that the law enforcers are are all bastards from cases which happened many years ago. All I can say in my viewing of the video is that a murder was recorded on video. Blueblade, your hate goggles do not make a balanced discussion, they make you look very naive. You won't concede an inch when it comes to the Police. I hope you never get burgled or assaulted. The first part of your post is quite reasonable. The second part, highly emotive and personalised, is absurd. I simply said it was a good job it was filmed or he'd have probably gotten away with it, which is true. I don't see what's unbalanced, naive or hate filled about that. I wasn't even replying to anyone !!! ![]() Merely a statement of fact. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: 我很孤
Posts: 3,532
|
Quote:
Scary. I would be petrified if I was stopped by police in the US especially if I was black. No wonder the guy bolted.
But no way did he have to be shot in the back eight times for them. He was murdered. |
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,409
|
Quote:
How can the other 7 shots happen? Has he got an uzi? Can you be shot 7 times in the back and still require an 8th shot? That's like something out of an Arnie movie.)
No surprise when someone is that fired up with testosterone and adrenaline pumping round their body. They claimed it was because of tactics employed by the Israeli security services. A claim staunchly (and angrily with almost sneering contempt) denied by Israel. And it is true. - Israel does not have, nor ever had such a policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern East Anglia
Posts: 75,211
|
Quote:
He's run off because there are probably a lot more misdemeanours pending than a broken tail light.
But no way did he have to be shot in the back eight times for them. He was murdered. You admit he was murdered, but have a pop at me for stating a fact about the filming. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,409
|
If it wasn't filmed, the police story would be believed.
I absolutely believe that to be the case. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 8,502
|
The suspect was shot 8 times because he wasn't dropped until 8 shots were fired. The number of shots with respect to whether the shooting was justified is irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: 我很孤
Posts: 3,532
|
Quote:
I thought you said you were out.
You admit he was murdered, but have a pop at me for stating a fact about the filming. Maybe you should do the same sometimes. It wasn't a pop, viewing your posts you are severely of the ACAB mindset. Reading the Duggan thread it is obvious that you have a real problem with law enforcement and seem to side with the villain rather than the upholders of the law. I hope one day that you get burgled, the police tell you to bugger off and the Duggans negotiate a price for you to get your stuff back. Enjoy the debt for life which will be imposed upon your naivety. My Dad was a copper for thirty years, not important I know but he taught me a lot about mugs. |
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern East Anglia
Posts: 75,211
|
Quote:
I'm sorry, I am out now.
Maybe you should do the same sometimes. It wasn't a pop, viewing your posts you are severely of the ACAB mindset. Reading the Duggan thread it is obvious that you have a real problem with law enforcement and seem to side with the villain rather than the upholders of the law. I hope one day that you get burgled, the police tell you to bugger off and the Duggans negotiate a price for you to get your stuff back. Enjoy the debt for life which will be imposed upon your naivety. My Dad was a copper for thirty years, not important I know but he taught me a lot about mugs. When I was still at home, we were burgled whilst on a family holiday, and all my Dad got from the police was a fleeting visit and a crime number for insurance purposes. As far as I know, the people responsible were never caught. I certainly have a problem with police who shoot dead those who present no threat to them. Don't you? By the way, I don't even know what the chuffing hell "ACAB" stands for - and yes mate, it was a pop and a totally random unnecessary one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: 我很孤
Posts: 3,532
|
Quote:
What a load of judgemental crap.
When I was still at home, we were burgled whilst on a family holiday, and all my Dad got from the plice was a fleeting visit and a crime number for insurance purposes. As far as I know, the people responsible were never caught. I certainly have a problem with police who shoot dead those who present no threat to them. Don't you? By the way, I don't even know what the chuffing hell "ACAB" stands for. Your tar has brushed the full force. I refuse to believe that you don't know what ACAB is an acronym for. |
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: dole office.
Posts: 35,061
|
Quote:
By the way, I don't even know what the chuffing hell "ACAB" stands for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern East Anglia
Posts: 75,211
|
Quote:
So lets get this straight, none of your posts have been judgemental crap against a Police force which tries it's best & does have bad apples?
Your tar has brushed the full force. If you want to comment on that then do so in the proper place, and don't give me any bull about this not being a deliberate personal pop. Quote:
I refuse to believe that you don't know what ACAB is an acronym for.
Believe what you like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Quote:
So lets get this straight, none of your posts have been judgemental crap against a Police force which tries it's best & does have bad apples?
Your tar has brushed the full force. I refuse to believe that you don't know what ACAB is an acronym for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: 我很孤
Posts: 3,532
|
Quote:
He/She has been judgemental about a cop who has shot a man eight times in the back. Why is that a bad thing? I'm judgemental about him too, he's a murderer.
As I said earlier, and maybe not very eloquently I think that Blueblade has a fundamental issue with the police and will seek out any story to belittle and / or discredit them. Not once have I seen a positive view put forward. To me that is an insult to a service he'd be buggered without. I don't mean any offence. Isn't that what discussion is all about? |
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 15,247
|
Quote:
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2...-murder-charge
they never seem to work when posted from a mobile. who sits on a grand jury? how`s that all work? |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,079
|
Quote:
Always baffles me why people get the idea that firing multiple shots is especially excessive or gung-ho.
You don't get a bonus for every bullet you bring back at the end of a shift. If you're working on the assumption that somebody needs shooting, for your own safety or (in the case of a cop) the safety of the public, then, at the risk of sounding callous, you might as well do the job properly. A shooting is a high-stress situation, you don't know how long you'll have your target in your sights and even the best marksmen can't guarantee to hit their target exactly where they intend to so, with that in mind, you don't want to risk firing one shot and then discovering you've missed. The real issue is simply why so many US cops seem to think that their gun is pretty-much the first and only tool to be employed whenever a situation goes awry. In the UK, I've seen a cop-car pull out to pursue a speeding biker on a suburban street and then, within a few seconds, pull over and give up. Clearly, the cop IS thinking about what's going on, there. He's thinking that he hasn't got a chance of catching a speeding biker who doesn't want to be caught. He's thinking that nicking somebody for speeding isn't worth the risk to members of the public which a high-speed chase through a suburban area will create and, finally, he's thinking that it isn't worth ending up with a biker splattered all over the road just for the sake of issuing a speeding ticket. Yank cops just don't seem to think through what they're doing at times. Instead of asking themselves if the situation actually warrants the possible use of deadly force they just seem to charge in and then, when the shit hits the fan, they use a gun to deal with the situation they've provoked. The thing that really worries me is that this is actually some kind of deliberate, unofficial, tactic that US cops have decided to employ in response to the number of cops who've been shot while on duty. The cop is an idiot, who clearly did the wrong thing here and will likely be punished. I don't think many will understand the situation over there because we don't have the same culture. Over here police have to think first because other options aren't readily available, that thinking time is often invaluable and is what either saves lives or prevents further injury. You give every person a gun, police or member of the public and allow them to carry them freely then you will frequently get moments where people in the heat of a moment do stupid or even bad things. It's times like this that I wish america wouldn't just punish someone, but look at the entire ethics around people having guns. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: dole office.
Posts: 35,061
|
Quote:
Thanks for posting the link!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,079
|
Quote:
my pleasure. i don`t understand why they don`t work, i didn`t change anything, just copied and pasted.
I'm not technically minded but found that's how it worked for me! |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,258
|
Quote:
Always baffles me why people get the idea that firing multiple shots is especially excessive or gung-ho.
You don't get a bonus for every bullet you bring back at the end of a shift. If you're working on the assumption that somebody needs shooting, for your own safety or (in the case of a cop) the safety of the public, then, at the risk of sounding callous, you might as well do the job properly. A shooting is a high-stress situation, you don't know how long you'll have your target in your sights and even the best marksmen can't guarantee to hit their target exactly where they intend to so, with that in mind, you don't want to risk firing one shot and then discovering you've missed. The real issue is simply why so many US cops seem to think that their gun is pretty-much the first and only tool to be employed whenever a situation goes awry. In the UK, I've seen a cop-car pull out to pursue a speeding biker on a suburban street and then, within a few seconds, pull over and give up. Clearly, the cop IS thinking about what's going on, there. He's thinking that he hasn't got a chance of catching a speeding biker who doesn't want to be caught. He's thinking that nicking somebody for speeding isn't worth the risk to members of the public which a high-speed chase through a suburban area will create and, finally, he's thinking that it isn't worth ending up with a biker splattered all over the road just for the sake of issuing a speeding ticket. Yank cops just don't seem to think through what they're doing at times. Instead of asking themselves if the situation actually warrants the possible use of deadly force they just seem to charge in and then, when the shit hits the fan, they use a gun to deal with the situation they've provoked. The thing that really worries me is that this is actually some kind of deliberate, unofficial, tactic that US cops have decided to employ in response to the number of cops who've been shot while on duty. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:42.





