|
||||||||
ED Rachel. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 912
|
ED Rachel.
Im wondering whether her being a stroppy mare is leading up to her departure. In her return interview it was implied she was only back temporaily. I didnt like the fact she set Belle up. That was nasty. I know she has been treated badly, but Belle is still fragile. What do u think?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,359
|
I hate how all the soaps bring back a character who has had a huge personality change...I liked Rachel better first time around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,161
|
Sadly, I think she is here to stay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,160
|
I hated this character the first time she was in it and hate her even more this time round.
She's always been a nasty, cheating, using little bitch but not in an entertaining kind of way like a good soap bitch and the actress has a very drab screen presence. I'm sad to say i found it very off-putting when Gemma Oaten said she thinks Rachel and Sam are a 'very special couple'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 56,112
|
Quote:
I hate how all the soaps bring back a character who has had a huge personality change...I liked Rachel better first time around.
![]() Couldn't care less about Sam, though..Rachel would be better off without him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,160
|
Quote:
Couldn't care about Sam, though..Rachel would be better off without him. She should leave Sam and go and find a man in Australia. And she can take awful Ali with her!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 8,040
|
Quote:
I blame Skank Charity.
![]() Couldn't care less about Sam, though..Rachel would be better off without him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,168
|
Quote:
I hated this character the first time she was in it and hate her even more this time round.
She's always been a nasty, cheating, using little bitch but not in an entertaining kind of way like a good soap bitch and the actress has a very drab screen presence. I'm sad to say i found it very off-putting when Gemma Oaten said she thinks Rachel and Sam are a 'very special couple'. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the Wind
Posts: 28,373
|
Bringing her back to give Charity her comeuppance was a good idea, as was having her wipe the self-satisfied smirk off Jai's face with the fake Archie revelation. After that though she should've disappeared back off into the sunset, never to be mentioned again.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,332
|
Quote:
I was pleased when she was axed, and completely mystified when they brought her back. I hope this is just a short visit and that she leaves soon, with the rest of the Spencers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Bringing her back to give Charity her comeuppance was a good idea, as was having her wipe the self-satisfied smirk off Jai's face with the fake Archie revelation. After that though she should've disappeared back off into the sunset, never to be mentioned again.
I never liked her, and like her even less now. I was so glad when she and that jacket she seemed to permanently wear, were forced to leave, by Charity. She and Ali should both go to a new life, far far away... |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Defending the lovely Moira
Posts: 12,340
|
Tbh this storyline confuses me
![]() Charity did a really despicable number on Rachel but everyone seems to have forgotten about that. The Dingles were originally disgusted when they found out what she had done but now they are all 'Team Charity' and are treating Rachel like she's dirt - it's like they have all forgotten what Rachel was put through and I don't get it. I also don't get why Rachel is now a right pain in the backside, I can't remember her being like that before. And that thing with the pills was just bizarre ![]() Is this leading somewhere? Anywhere?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,431
|
dont like any of the spencer family and i cannot stand belle either
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,865
|
I'm not sure what the point in bringing her back was. She's come back with a huge chip on her shoulder which might make her more interesting to watch but it feels forced. Her and Sam don't work either. He worked better with Tracy who injected a bit of life into him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 68
|
I agree
What she did to belle was horrible, hope Lisa slaps her one |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 68,914
|
She's vile. She makes Dobbie look like Mother Teresa 😃
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,434
|
I liked her the first time around. Don't think she contributes much to the story line now. SB is trying to make her unlikeable, but is only making her boring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 376
|
Rachel is not a bad person, unlike the hypocritical Dingles. She went away to save Sam from going to prison and only came back because the police found her and persuaded her to testify. Instead of being welcomed back, she has had abuse from all sides with even her own sister believing the lies that were told about her. If you watched when she left the pill out, she hesitated and was about to put it back when Belle came in. She should leave and find a life with decent people. She has proved that she can survive on her own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,332
|
Quote:
I liked her the first time around. Don't think she contributes much to the story line now. SB is trying to make her unlikeable, but is only making her boring.
, but I think it was KO that sacked her last time. She won't be back for long I hope. She's a nasty piece of work - but all the new females are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 376
|
Quote:
I'm sure he's contributing, being a 'consultant'
, but I think it was KO that sacked her last time. She won't be back for long I hope. She's a nasty piece of work - but all the new females are.I thought she was asked to leave before her contract was up as they needed to develop the Charity/Declan fire story line. She was always going to come back. And in my opinion she was one of the only nice people in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Coventry, Warwickshire
Posts: 4,926
|
Quote:
Bringing her back to give Charity her comeuppance was a good idea, as was having her wipe the self-satisfied smirk off Jai's face with the fake Archie revelation. After that though she should've disappeared back off into the sunset, never to be mentioned again.
Quote:
Rachel is not a bad person, unlike the hypocritical Dingles. She went away to save Sam from going to prison and only came back because the police found her and persuaded her to testify. Instead of being welcomed back, she has had abuse from all sides with even her own sister believing the lies that were told about her. If you watched when she left the pill out, she hesitated and was about to put it back when Belle came in. She should leave and find a life with decent people. She has proved that she can survive on her own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 125,430
|
Didn't Gemma decide to leave and then get asked to go back for trial? I remember reading that that had happened just after she had got settled in London. If that's all true, I assume she's not staying?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 39,613
|
I'm equally baffled as to why Rachel's been suddenly transformed into a devious bitch, it makes no sense at all. She's back. she's got Sam from Tracey, Charity's banged up, she's got everything she wants.
It feels like she can't possibly be staying. Maybe they really just brought her back for the trial and the big Archie reveal and are now writing her as a cow to give her a reason to leave again. There's another thread with a rumour that the whole Spencer family are leaving, so maybe she'll go then, if it's true. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rainham, Essex
Posts: 4,339
|
Quote:
I'm equally baffled as to why Rachel's been suddenly transformed into a devious bitch, it makes no sense at all. She's back. she's got Sam from Tracey, Charity's banged up, she's got everything she wants.
It feels like she can't possibly be staying. Maybe they really just brought her back for the trial and the big Archie reveal and are now writing her as a cow to give her a reason to leave again. There's another thread with a rumour that the whole Spencer family are leaving, so maybe she'll go then, if it's true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,168
|
Quote:
I'm equally baffled as to why Rachel's been suddenly transformed into a devious bitch, it makes no sense at all. She's back. she's got Sam from Tracey, Charity's banged up, she's got everything she wants.
It feels like she can't possibly be staying. Maybe they really just brought her back for the trial and the big Archie reveal and are now writing her as a cow to give her a reason to leave again. There's another thread with a rumour that the whole Spencer family are leaving, so maybe she'll go then, if it's true. Pleeaase let it be true !! |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:36.






, but I think it was KO that sacked her last time. She won't be back for long I hope. She's a nasty piece of work - but all the new females are.