Then there was that Pudding Lane 'incident', never mind the 'Nero's Rome' incident. Let's face it, The Doctor's a complete Health and Safety Gawn Mad menace!
Wikileaks 'reveals Doctor Who film plans'
4 of 7
I know non-fireball suggestions might be heresy, but let's remember the fireball is a CGI effect. They could go back to the original raw footage and make an entire film about the 9th Doctor running away from different things.
Originally Posted by be more pacific:
“I know non-fireball suggestions might be heresy, but let's remember the fireball is a CGI effect. They could go back to the original raw footage and make an entire film about the 9th Doctor running away from different things.”
“I know non-fireball suggestions might be heresy, but let's remember the fireball is a CGI effect. They could go back to the original raw footage and make an entire film about the 9th Doctor running away from different things.”
They could make Fireman Sam his companion. That'd get more kids excited.
Originally Posted by Lewis Christian:
“They could make Fireman Sam his companion. That'd get more kids excited.”
“They could make Fireman Sam his companion. That'd get more kids excited.”
They could have Fireman Sam ask the Doctor really longwinded questions to which the answers are things like "Ghosts from the past", "Aliens from the future" and "The day the Earth died in a ball of flame".
I'm sure creative minds could get a two-hour epic out of that trailer alone.
I want to see Eccleston impersonate Dalek Caan...
I FLLLEEEEEEEEEWWWW into the wild and fire.
I danced and died a thousand times!
I FLLLEEEEEEEEEWWWW into the wild and fire.
I danced and died a thousand times!
Originally Posted by be more pacific:
“Moffat was careful not to make it appear that Eccleston had shown up to shoot new material for Day of the Doctor. Which is why the regeneration cuts off just as Eccleston's face is becoming clear.”
“Moffat was careful not to make it appear that Eccleston had shown up to shoot new material for Day of the Doctor. Which is why the regeneration cuts off just as Eccleston's face is becoming clear.”
i wasn't referring to the regeneration, I was referring to the scene from Parting of the Ways which was included in Day of the Doctor.
Still don't see why a new contract would have to be done. BBC Wales and BBC Studios are still a part of the same corporation.
Originally Posted by adams66:
“That was a couple of seconds!
You are genuinely suggesting that a whole film could be built around a few seconds of archive film? You really are taking the p..s aren't you?
If you are actually serious I'd suggest having a wee look at how films are actually made so you can appreciate how far from reality your suggestion actually is....”
“That was a couple of seconds!
You are genuinely suggesting that a whole film could be built around a few seconds of archive film? You really are taking the p..s aren't you?
If you are actually serious I'd suggest having a wee look at how films are actually made so you can appreciate how far from reality your suggestion actually is....”
There was no 'seconds' of LEGO, just building blocks and minifigures! And there aren't even any figures with Play-Doh - something else being turned into a film currently. It seems to be a new trend in Hollywood in being creative with already existing properties.
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“There was no 'seconds' of LEGO, just building blocks and minifigures! And there aren't even any figures with Play-Doh - something else being turned into a film currently. It seems to be a new trend in Hollywood in being creative with already existing properties.”
“There was no 'seconds' of LEGO, just building blocks and minifigures! And there aren't even any figures with Play-Doh - something else being turned into a film currently. It seems to be a new trend in Hollywood in being creative with already existing properties.”
Ah, I see what the problem is here. You're confused over the difference between a 10-second piece of footage and a concept.
A concept can be expanded indefinitely. The only limitation is the imagination.
A 10-second piece of footage, however, lasts for ten seconds. Even if you play it in slow motion, it can't be expanded very much. There is no way that an actor who appears silently for 10 seconds can be the leading man in a film.
Hope this helps.
Originally Posted by be more pacific:
“Ah, I see what the problem is here. You're confused over the difference between a 10-second piece of footage and a concept.
A concept can be expanded indefinitely. The only limitation is the imagination.
A 10-second piece of footage, however, lasts for ten seconds. Even if you play it in slow motion, it can't be expanded very much. There is no way that an actor who appears silently for 10 seconds can be the leading man in a film.
Hope this helps.”
“Ah, I see what the problem is here. You're confused over the difference between a 10-second piece of footage and a concept.
A concept can be expanded indefinitely. The only limitation is the imagination.
A 10-second piece of footage, however, lasts for ten seconds. Even if you play it in slow motion, it can't be expanded very much. There is no way that an actor who appears silently for 10 seconds can be the leading man in a film.
Hope this helps.”
Yeah but you can build a story around a 10 second clip just as you can with LEGO (proven by Lord and Miller). There's absolutely no reason why a 10 second clip couldn't be a stimulus for something bigger.
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“Yeah but you can build a story around a 10 second clip just as you can with LEGO. There's absolutely no reason why a 10 second clip couldn't be a stimulus for something bigger.”
“Yeah but you can build a story around a 10 second clip just as you can with LEGO. There's absolutely no reason why a 10 second clip couldn't be a stimulus for something bigger.”
"So chaps, what's your pitch for this movie? What's the hook, the inspiration?"
"Chris Eccleston running down a corridor away from a CGI explosion."
"Erm."
Originally Posted by Lewis Christian:
“"So chaps, what's your pitch for this movie? What's the hook, the inspiration?"
"Chris Eccleston running down a corridor away from a CGI explosion."
"Erm."”
“"So chaps, what's your pitch for this movie? What's the hook, the inspiration?"
"Chris Eccleston running down a corridor away from a CGI explosion."
"Erm."”
....we don't see why he was running down that corridor. What he was running away from. What if it was a controlled fireball able to lock into and follow its target? What if it was a part of a bigger plot? Who could send such a thing? Daleks...or something else?"
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“....we don't see why he was running down that corridor. What he was running away from. What if it was a controlled fireball able to lock into and follow its target? What if it was a part of a bigger plot? Who could send such a thing? Daleks...or something else?"”
“....we don't see why he was running down that corridor. What he was running away from. What if it was a controlled fireball able to lock into and follow its target? What if it was a part of a bigger plot? Who could send such a thing? Daleks...or something else?"”
You've gotta be taking the mick.
Originally Posted by Michael_Eve:
“One would presume so. Although the film Doctor Who: Fireball XL has a ring to it.”
“One would presume so. Although the film Doctor Who: Fireball XL has a ring to it.”
Deep Fireball
Into the Fireball
Kill the Fireball
Fireball on the Orient Express
In the Fireball of the Night / In the Forest of the Fireball
Dark Fireball / Fireball in Heaven
Last Fireball (RIP)
The fireball could cross over into other films/franchises too. Kind of like a Shared Cinematic Fireball
Isn't it becoming pretty obvious someone's bored and winding people up for sport? The dignity of the responses is admirable but totally undeserved. It's getting nonsensical.
Originally Posted by saladfingers81:
“Isn't it becoming pretty obvious someone's bored and winding people up for sport? The dignity of the responses is admirable but totally undeserved. It's getting nonsensical.”
“Isn't it becoming pretty obvious someone's bored and winding people up for sport? The dignity of the responses is admirable but totally undeserved. It's getting nonsensical.”
What would be the point in that?
Proof that I'm not winding people up related to a earlier discussion:
https://www.fanfiction.net/s/9733466/1/The-12-Doctors
If you genuinely think it's viable for anyone to construct a 14 film series based on each Doctor including a mega budget movie based around one ten second sequence then it's difficult to know what more responses there can be without quite frankly being a bit rude. I mean the entire concept is a bad joke.
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“What would be the point in that?
Proof that I'm not winding people up related to a earlier discussion:
https://www.fanfiction.net/s/9733466/1/The-12-Doctors”
“What would be the point in that?
Proof that I'm not winding people up related to a earlier discussion:
https://www.fanfiction.net/s/9733466/1/The-12-Doctors”
Kudos for the amount of effort you put into your wind-up material.
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“Yeah but you can build a story around a 10 second clip just as you can with LEGO (proven by Lord and Miller). There's absolutely no reason why a 10 second clip couldn't be a stimulus for something bigger.”
“Yeah but you can build a story around a 10 second clip just as you can with LEGO (proven by Lord and Miller). There's absolutely no reason why a 10 second clip couldn't be a stimulus for something bigger.”
Apart from all the reasons that every other poster here has pointed out, and apart from the fact that you are talking utter nonsense.
But you've kept me and many others on this forum well entertained with your increasingly bizarre and unhinged posts, so well done.
Originally Posted by adams66:
“Apart from all the reasons that every other poster here has pointed out, and apart from the fact that you are talking utter nonsense.
But you've kept me and many others on this forum well entertained with your increasingly bizarre and unhinged posts, so well done.”
“Apart from all the reasons that every other poster here has pointed out, and apart from the fact that you are talking utter nonsense.
But you've kept me and many others on this forum well entertained with your increasingly bizarre and unhinged posts, so well done.
”
It's either insanity or Olympic-standard trolling. The idea that a 9th Doctor's movie in a pre-commissioned series of 14 (or more) movies could have just 10 seconds of Eccleston is comedy gold.
The rest of the film would have 90-120 minutes of people talking about the Doctor while his actual appearance would be 10 seconds of footage from an old TV trailer shot on SD video. And this is somehow comparable to The Lego Movie? Seriously, WTF?! Did the Lego Movie show 10 seconds from an old Lego advert and then spend 90-120 minutes on a storyline which only ever mentions Lego without ever showing it?
Are we really supposed to believe that Dalekbuster523 can't grasp the difference between shot footage and a concept?
If Alan Partridge and Katie Hopkins had a baby together, and the child grew old enough to sign up to the Digital Spy forums... what username do you think it'd choose?
Personally my impression is that Sony would part fund the film version with BBC Films and Worldwide with possible considerations in the contract. I don't think they would 'Hollywoodise' the franchise. For example they help to rejuvenate the Bond Franchise with Daniel Craig and look how brilliant and successful Skyfall was.
If anyone was to help with a Doctor Who movie Sony would be my first pick. If they can do it with a British institution like James Bond, then they can do it with Doctor Who. If anything I reckon Daniel Craig would be a bloody brilliant actor to play the Doctor!
If anyone was to help with a Doctor Who movie Sony would be my first pick. If they can do it with a British institution like James Bond, then they can do it with Doctor Who. If anything I reckon Daniel Craig would be a bloody brilliant actor to play the Doctor!
Originally Posted by be more pacific:
“The rest of the film would have 90-120 minutes of people talking about the Doctor while his actual appearance would be 10 seconds of footage from an old TV trailer shot on SD video.”
“The rest of the film would have 90-120 minutes of people talking about the Doctor while his actual appearance would be 10 seconds of footage from an old TV trailer shot on SD video.”
That's why you wouldn't have 90-120 minutes of people discussing the Doctor. Rather 10 minutes of Rose trying trying to work out where the Doctor is and investigating with the TARDIS to try and figure out where he is (maybe he even disappeared in front of her in the TARDIS?), 10 minutes of Rose exploring where the TARDIS lands, one minute as Rose explores a nearby building, finds 9 running away from a fireball and runs with until he mysteriously disappears again, another minute where Rose reenters the building and sees 9 running away from the fireball again, 10 minutes of Rose enlisting help from UNIT and other unlikely places to find out what's going on, 20 minutes of UNIT fighting a invasion from those behind the fireball during which they find out the fireball is locked onto its target of the 9th Doctor and that these invaders have trapped 9 in a time loop until the fireball kills him before he can regenerate, 5 minutes of Rose travelling back and exploring a different area of the building where she finds a strange device, 5 minutes as the leader of the alien invaders seen earlier appears and explains it's what brought 9 here and taking Rose captive, 10 minutes of the invaders being attacked by someone (who then saves Rose), two minutes of Rose destroying the device (which not only causes 9 running from the fire ball to return to the TARDIS but brings him out of the time loop) and five minutes of Rose on her own sitting in the TARDIS in thought as a monologue from Billie Piper is heard.
Originally Posted by Isambard Brunel:
“If Alan Partridge and Katie Hopkins had a baby together, and the child grew old enough to sign up to the Digital Spy forums... what username do you think it'd choose?”
“If Alan Partridge and Katie Hopkins had a baby together, and the child grew old enough to sign up to the Digital Spy forums... what username do you think it'd choose?”
That would surely be Popkins. My username is not Popkins.
This is some next level 'tr*****g'. I mean I've been on the internet a while but it's a work of art.
4 of 7
