Originally Posted by
Soppyfan:
“Someone mentioned in the previous part of this thread (before part 3 was made) that Swinson may defy the odds in Dunbartonshire East, well according to this constituency poll, it tells a much different story:
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2015/04...unbartonshire/”
I know that the LibDems are likely to hold some seats with popular MPs where their policies have not been harmful. I hope Jo keeps her seat but my guess is not so promising.
Originally Posted by Rich Tea.:
“Michael Portillo thinks Labour are ahead and that the polls are not genuinely level between the two parties.
His reasoning is that the Tories are averaging about 33% and Labour 35% (his assertion) which means that compared to the actual vote share at the last election Labour are up about 6% and the Conservatives are down 3% which looks decisive in Labour's favour.
Certainly a point worth picking over I think.”
Did Michael think Labour were ahead in Enfield Southgate in 1997? I think the main parties stuck around 34% mean the PM after the next GE will have the lowest ever share of the vote, and maybe lowest number of votes.
Originally Posted by MARTYM8:
“Come May 8 i confidently predict neither Ed Milliband or David Cameron will be running the country - Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon will be in charge. That seems to be the only conclusion from the polls.”
Following Nicola's performance in the first debate, a few people googled whether they can vote SNP in England. Let's suppose the SNP had fielded candidates nationwide. They probably could have fond willing participants from their swollen membership. Could the SNP then have become the largest party at Westminster?
Originally Posted by Tassium:
“If it were just England/Wales then he's probably right. But Scotland are helping the Conservatives this time.
Ironic that it's Scotland that are keeping the Conservatives in the race by diminishing Labour.”
The swing from Labour to SNP could lose enough Labour seats to help the Conservatives remain the largest party, so yes I agree. This could lead to the referendum having been a Cameron masterstroke!
Originally Posted by MattXfactor:
“I'd agree with that, I said this a while ago to which many UKIP supporters heavily criticised me but I'm still thinking they'll win 2 seats. I'm pretty sure on Carswell holding, and I'm 50/50 on Reckless & Farage but I think they'll edge one of the 2 , other than that I don't see where they are going to win seats? Probably alot of 2nd places.”
I think just Carswell and Farage, with Reckless of Rochester having been Reckless of Rochester with his short-lived parliamentary career.
Originally Posted by MARTYM8:
“Nothing quite beats 1983 - the SDP Liberal Alliance won 25 per cent to Labours 27 per cent yet Labour won ten times as many seats (209 vs 23). Labours vote was concentrated whereas the Alliance vote spread more evenly.
That was a disgraceful situation.”
I remember that, and 1987 was much the same. Now, they could have less than half the 1983 voteshare but more seats than 1983, as some post-1992 seats are theirs for keeps, such as Eastleigh, Twickenham, Cheadle and Westmoreland & Lonsdale.