• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
EastEnders: See Shirley Carter unleash her anger at Stan's wake
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
kitkat1971
23-04-2015
Originally Posted by Mellsbells:
“Is she actually on the deeds? Or just added as a licensee?”

As lotty says nobody seems to know and never have done. It was something loads of us were asking when it first happened, was a legal document drawn up, did she get a third of the profits or was she still paid a salary for her work behind the bar, would she be able to stop linda and Mick selling if they wanted to move on or would they have to give her a third of the current value of the business, is it just the pub or the flat as well etc, etc.

They never told us because they wanted to keep it vague.
kitkat1971
23-04-2015
Originally Posted by Mrs Mouse:
“Can't wait to see Shirley in her leg warmers What A Feeling be playing in the background ...”

Yes, once i'd got over my initial "oh horrible cow" reaction, Flashdance was the next thing i thought of!
Shawn_Lunn
23-04-2015
Shirley is an utter moron and a parasite. If I were Mick and Linda, I'd be laughing at her idiotic antics, not being shocked by them.
0...0
23-04-2015
Originally Posted by Mrs Mouse:
“Can't wait to see Shirley in her leg warmers What A Feeling playing in the background ...”

Love it!!!!
broadshoulder
23-04-2015
Originally Posted by Mrs Mouse:
“Can't wait to see Shirley in her leg warmers What A Feeling playing in the background ...”

Mo? is that you?
eejm
23-04-2015
Originally Posted by Mrs Mouse:
“Can't wait to see Shirley in her leg warmers What A Feeling playing in the background ...”

Glad I wasn't the only one getting the Flashdance vibe. Hopefully she won't lean back and pour water all over herself.
sorcha_healy27
23-04-2015
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“Light hearted?

Maybe i've just had a sense of humour bypass but i fail to see how destroying a sign in such a dangerous way (she might have a safety helmet on but does everybody around her that may get hit by hot flying metal) can ever be considered anything other than serious and upsetting, let alone at a wake.

It is disrespectful to stan's memory, upsetting to the rest of the family (not just Mick and Linda but Nancy and Lee and especially Tina who really is the one caught in the middle of it all) and downright distasteful.

If she demands money as a pay off for her 'share' i really will hit the roof.”

Well said kit kat. It's despicable behaviour on Shirley's part as per.
ALowsley
23-04-2015
Originally Posted by vald:
“Because she is a creature of impulse, and this would take thought and planning. The only person I could see working in this way is Phil...crushing Jack's car, getting his own back on Sharon, getting the Arches back from Max etc. As someone else said she is more a 'brick through the window' type.”

I see what you mean. I'm just surprised Shirley will wear protective gear as it's not really Shirley's style. I'm looking forward for Mick and Linda to buy Shirley out of the Vic even though she selfishly demanded a stake of the Vic in January 2014.
Keyser_Soze1
23-04-2015
Just an ordinary square in good old London town.

But tonight in the Queen Victoria Public House, we are about to enter...

The Twilight Zone.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map